Cookie policy notice

By continuing to use this site you agree to our cookies policy below:
Since 26 May 2011, the law now states that cookies on websites can ony be used with your specific consent. Cookies allow us to ensure that you enjoy the best browsing experience.

This site is intended for health professionals only

At the heart of general practice since 1960

Dr Grant Ingrams: ‘The CCG is taking money from general practice to put into hospital’

One CCG is using money meant for GP practices to plug gaps in the local acute trust. Dr Grant Ingrams, vice-chair of Coventry LMC, explains that local GPs are angry about having money taken away

The CCG has had extra, unexpected activity within the A&E department at our local hospital and they therefore told us that there was less money available for the £5 per head of population, that they wouldn’t do that.

My understanding was that this money was supposed to go to general practice for providing care for over 75s.

In this case they have said ‘we are going to spend the money elsewhere therefore don’t even bother putting in your applications’.

My view is that the CCG is being very short sighted. They have opted not to invest in general practice being able to care for vulnerable elderly patients, which can lead to increased pressure on the hospital in future. To say that we are going to take that money out, which may have actually started to turn that tide of patients going into hospital around, in order to shore up secondary care is in my mind very short sighted.

The worrying, sad thing is that local GPs are just not surprised that money, despite being part of a national initiative, are being taken away to be put into secondary care again.

Although GPs are really angry – there was an open meeting held where there was quite palpable feelings of anger - they are really just wondering what on earth is going on, when the CCG is taking money from general practice to put into hospital, which is really the reverse of what they were designed to do.

It is a missed opportunity by the CCG to improve services for the over 75s. It is the population that will suffer because of it. What effect it may have is on recruitment of GPs into Coventry. I mean, if you are looking for a job and you have got one area where the CCG is investing in developing and improving primary care and general practice, and then you’ve got areas like Coventry which aren’t, where are you going to work?

We know there is no point raising this issue with the CCG again for this year. There is no point, the money is taken. But I think that the CCG has been given a very strong message from its membership that we don’t expect to see such things again, so I hope that they will listen. It is supposedly a membership organisation.

Dr Grant Ingrams is vice-chair of Coventry LMC and a member of the GPC

Readers' comments (6)

  • Sack the GP members of the CCG.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Simply appaulling.
    Managers in a CCG, supported no doubt by GPs who think that they have to suck up to them if they are to do anything, just doing what the always do. Just stuffing money into hospital and ignoring the dreadful plight that is general practice.

    This short term isn't approach is destroying general practice and will destroy the NHS

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Appalling spelling!

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Sorry Grant.

    Like everything in life, the CCG has to pay the bill if it wants a service. If the unplanned admissions DES fails, as we all know it will, and patients still pitch up to ED in ever increasing numbers, the CCG has to stump up for it (albeit at 20% of tariff, way below cost). Tough.

    It might help if they didn't offer lucrative private contracts to each other's companies. 60% of all new contracts, creaming off simple cataracts and other procedures, without offering any of the training, and wrap around support that the Trust has to offer. Money that could have been spent in the local Trust to avoid it getting into financial difficulties in the first place...

    That's why those of your colleagues who sold out and formed the CCG should have known better. And believe you me, whenever they can get away with it, they do their best not to pay.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • John Glasspool

    So why don't the local GPs (THE CCG- remember?) call an emergency meeting and pass a vote of no-confidence in the board and management? It is easy to do, I suspect.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • This comment has been removed by the moderator.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Have your say