Cookie policy notice

By continuing to use this site you agree to our cookies policy below:
Since 26 May 2011, the law now states that cookies on websites can ony be used with your specific consent. Cookies allow us to ensure that you enjoy the best browsing experience.

This site is intended for health professionals only

At the heart of general practice since 1960

GPs shouldn’t have to face the GMC in the midst of mental illness

Professor Clare Gerada

The national GP health service (GPH), which opens in January 2017, is long overdue. GPs suffer from mental health problems at a higher rate than the rest of the population but often have trouble seeking help. However, this mental health service, whilst important, is not enough - the whole system needs to change to help GPs and other healthcare professionals with mental health problems.

Would it not be better to allow doctors to get better before passing through an adversarial system?

Importantly, we should reduce the need for doctors with mental health problems to have to go through a stressful GMC fitness to practise process while they are ill, but give them space to recover first. And since mental illness is often the trigger for the process in the first place, the whole procedure may be unnecessary after their recovery.

Disciplinary processes

Over the last nine years, many of the doctors attending the NHS Practitioner Health Programme (PHP), a London based confidential service for doctors and dentists with mental health problems which I run, have been involved in disciplinary or investigatory processes, such as GMC procedures or Trust Disciplinary Processes. The mental illness they present with might have been triggered by this involvement or, more often in our experience, their mental illness has led to the referral to the GMC. 

Whether a doctor with a mental illness should or must be referred to the GMC is a grey area, and when done, it is almost always under cover of ‘patient safety’ reasons - although in our experience no doctor has harmed a patient due to their own mental illness.

Some doctors who admit to having a depressive illness might be told (incorrectly) that they have to refer themselves to the GMC. The more severe the illness the more likely that this advice is given to the doctor. Not infrequently the doctor is referred by their employer or other outside body on the basis of their mental illness. Finally, there are doctors referred to the GMC for performance issues, for example shouting at staff, coming in late, appearing tired and un-engaged, where following assessment the performance problem is almost certainly related to their mental state and undiagnosed mental illness. This category is especially the case for doctors trained overseas.

It serves no one well to have sick doctors pushed through an adversarial system such as a fitness to practise process. At worst it can lead to a worsening of their mental health problem and even suicide, and it acts as a disincentive for doctors in need to disclose they are having problems.

GMC reform

Over the years PHP has built up very good relationship with the GMC and we have been impressed by the work that they are doing to reduce unnecessary stress on doctors passing through their processes. They have conducted a review of doctors who have killed themselves whilst undergoing GMC investigation, and have commissioned Professor Louis Appleby to recommend steps that can be implemented to reduce the burden on doctors and at the same time maintain GMC standards and protect patients, for example recommending that the GMC spares doctors with mental health issues from a full investigation.

The GMC has also re-written almost all their material which is sent to doctors and revised their processes to ensure that they do not inadvertently lead to serious distress. For example they have minimised the number of letters sent and ensured letters are not all sent to arrive on a Saturday morning when doctors might be alone. The GMC has also funded the BMA to provide a support service for doctors going through GMC processes.

More needs to be done

However, there is still more that can be done. At present a mentally ill doctor will be expected to present themselves, often whilst still in the acute stages of their illness for assessment by two GMC appointed psychiatrists, and in the process disclose personal and painful information solely for the purpose of this assessment and not for their own needs. They will also need to present themselves, whilst still unwell, to an Interim Orders Panel where a decision might be made to suspend a doctor for many months ahead, denying them of income and purpose. In addition, the sick doctor will have to respond to GMC and other legal correspondence, attend meetings with their legal representatives and/or Trust hierarchy. All of this whilst still unwell.

Not surprisingly in our experience doctors faced with this situation become more unwell and find it hard to focus on their own mental health needs. Instead they have to down play their distress and mask their illness as otherwise they risk sanctions for ‘not being better’. A broken leg in a doctor does not heal any quicker than in a non-doctor, nor does their depression, their psychosis, or indeed their addiction (though they have better outcomes in terms of long term abstinence). Would it not be better, as with court diversion schemes, to allow doctors to get better, seek confidential help, give them the time and support to recover before passing through (if needed at all) an adversarial system? As long as they and their patients are safe, this would be kinder and more beneficial for all.

Professor Clare Gerada is a GP in south London, partner in the Hurley group and medical director of the practitioner health programme

The fee for this piece has been donated to The Louise Tebboth Foundation, established in memory of Louise Marson (nee Tebboth), a Bermondsey GP who took her life in January 2015. The Foundation aims to provide financial assistance to projects and services which support the mental well-being of doctors in England and Wales and initiatives assisting the bereaved families of doctors who have died by suicide.

 

Rate this article  (4 average user rating)

Click to rate

  • 1 star out of 5
  • 2 stars out of 5
  • 3 stars out of 5
  • 4 stars out of 5
  • 5 stars out of 5

0 out of 5 stars

Readers' comments (8)

  • Now the GMC is not run by a panel of medical experts I don't think doctors should 'face them' at all. It should all be through court with a non political, fair and transparent judiciary. Get rid of the GMC. Doctors should not be paying for this.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Admit you're not well.. face the wrath of the GMC, Dont admit when you're unwell.. face the wrath if the GMC. Solution stay well and learn to become resiliant and dont allow yourself any of the leeway you afford your patients as the GMC are for them they are not for you. Your job is pay their fees and keep your head down until its finally time to retire.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • If only the sodding RCGP would use it's influence to make positive changes for GP, eh ex-chair? Instead of bolstering GP difficulties by cosying up to the government and agreeing with everything they suggest.

    Scrap the GMC and replace with a body of our peers again. Stop appraisal. Get rid of CQC. Protect income and increase in line with inflation each year. Stop unresourced work dump on GP.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Pie in the sky. Doctors are still the enemy, guilty until proven innocent, every one of them a shipman in the making. The GMC must seek and destroy any doctor that is not perfect and pure, in their thinking, in their work and in their appearance. God forbid doctors are human. As others have said, if you are ill or in trouble, tell no one, especially your own GP, he will refer you to the GMC, if he doesn't your own collegues will. If they don't, just one upset patient whom you didn't give the sick note to or offer antibiotics to will do it.

    Leave the GMC comrades
    Leave the RCGP comrades
    Leave the NHS comrades
    Leave the country comrades.

    Peace out

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • How many Psychiatrists are paid specialists working for the GMC?

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • I regret becoming a doctor. The work is so hard. The numbers I see way beyond belief and safety. When I did OOH, I have seen 68 patients between 8 am and midnight, one day, many, many times. Before that, 80 hour every other weekend in a 1:2 Practice and in hospitals.
    The hours and workloads are so horrendous, yet we doctors carry the can if a mistake is made.
    Even sane people crack under such unremitting pressure as Prof Stephenson [ GMC] pointed out; it is like soldiers going to war, except we never, ever get a break.
    Why is this so?
    Because RCGP will not define safety. Maureen said she would like to see 50 patients a day. But she never said what she would like to see safely.
    So Prof Gerada, it is folks like you, who say all these trite things, but never do anything about it.
    Words are cheap. Do not become a doctor. Should career officers in schools not say Prof Stevenson's quote to future medical students?

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • I have been under GMC undertakings for 6 1/2 years. I have a history of addiction and mental health problems.
    My experience is the GMC have treated me fairly. The process could be made less stressful but they are making progress.
    I am a far from perfect Doctor and the GMC have made it possible for me to continue to work as a GP.
    My main advice which clashes with one of the comments above is to ask for help! When I realised I couldn't fix myself and was a vulnerable imperfect human being who needed support I was able to start the recovery process.
    However scary it might be to have GMC involvement it doesn't have to be the end of the world. Trying to cope with addiction and mental illness alone will more often than not become the end of the world.
    I used to hate and resent the GMC, better to focus in than externalise at things I don't have much control over. A degree of fear remains but I no longer dislike this organisation.
    By the way I don't work for the GMC and respect all opinions. I am just speaking form personal experience of the GMC process.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • GP Partner. 12th Nov.2016. 5-55pm.

    "Even sane people crack under unremitting pressure".

    This is because unremitting environmental pressures and personal life - intense adversities are the real cause of so much psychological ill health - not "chemical imbalances".

    Presumably the influence of drug-based mainstream psychiatry on the "management" of burned-out G.P.s seeking help will ensure that many will experience themselves, the enormous range of serious ADRs caused by SSRIs and other psychotropic drugs.

    "Medication" destroyed sexuality, prescription drug induced suicidality, violence and completed suicide, or SSRI induced toxic psychosis.

    Might facing the GMC be less hazardous than being subject to excessive psychotropic medication?

    If this service offers care based on compassion, empathy and effective psychotherapy then the above sincere concern is retracted in good faith.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Have your say

IMPORTANT: On Wednesday 7 December 2016, we implemented a new log in system, and if you have not updated your details you may experience difficulties logging in. Update your details here. Only GMC-registered doctors are able to comment on this site.