Cookie policy notice

By continuing to use this site you agree to our cookies policy below:
Since 26 May 2011, the law now states that cookies on websites can ony be used with your specific consent. Cookies allow us to ensure that you enjoy the best browsing experience.

This site is intended for health professionals only

At the heart of general practice since 1960

Hunt: This year will define GPs' role in the NHS

GPs’ reaction to challenges in 2013 will prove a ‘sink or swim’ moment for the profession, argues health secretary Jeremy Hunt

For the world of general practice, 2013 promises to be as busy as it will be decisive.

With the arrival of clinical commissioning groups, the new era of revalidation, and vital changes to the GP contract, family doctors will never stray far from the centre of the debate. Last year showed the most enterprising GPs can achieve extraordinary things. Whether spearheading the expansion of IV treatments at home in Wokingham or cutting diabetics hospital admissions in Cambridge, we saw doctors asserting themselves over the healthcare system like never before.

This year, GPs must show even more of this clinical entrepreneurship to serve patients and the community effectively.

So what are the big priorities?

Well, first, we have to do better on dementia and other long-term conditions. A third of the population have long-term conditions and they currently account for more than half of GP appointments and over two-thirds of all money spent on the NHS. Getting their care right, helping them self-manage effectively, reducing pain and distress, and allowing them to stay hospital-free for longer, is one of the defining challenges thrown up by an ageing population.

As much as the NHS has shown early progress in finding the efficiency savings identified by David Nicholson, we now need a Herculean effort to shift the system from ‘salvage and rescue’ to prevention and early intervention. Strong general practice is at the heart of this, nowhere more so than in dementia care, where GPs are vital in helping more people get the early treatment and support they need, and I’ll be expanding on that in the months ahead.

A second priority is reducing preventable deaths. We have to face up to the fact that our record on premature mortality, particularly for the five big killers (cancer, heart disease, stroke, respiratory and liver disease) is not good enough.

Cancer is a case in point: we see far too many patients presenting late in A&E. But whether it’s the 800,000 with undiagnosed diabetes, or the million with undiagnosed chronic kidney disease, and the similar numbers with COPD, we need to find the ‘missing millions’ steadily accumulating ‘silent’ damage due to delayed diagnosis.

The new system is fundamentally about change at grassroots, giving GPs more scope, through their leadership role in CCGs, to develop the right services for their patients, working in partnership with all parts of the health and care system across the spectrum of prevention, early diagnosis and treatment.  

This, for me, is the key: if we can do it well, we can really drive improvements and finally make England what it should be: a global beacon for excellence in preventative medicine, and one of the best in Europe for mortality rates.

Separating the optimists from the pessimists

Here’s another question for 2013: shouldn’t the country that first invented the internet now be at the forefront of a digital revolution in healthcare? Are we in danger of providing a service out of step with the realities of how people live today?

Face-to-face appointments will always be the staple – not all patients are able to, or would want to use technology for their interactions with GPs themselves. But we are already seeing how things like routine online bookings, text-based appointment reminders or negative test results and even ‘virtual surgeries’ can not only help make primary care more relevant to changing lifestyles but can help free up time allowing GPs and practices to spend more time with patients.

Yes, we have to mindful of capacity – I want to support GPs not hinder them – but this is an area we do need to push much harder if we want our services to become more responsive and convenient for patients.

Finally, the most important issue of all: how to safeguard standards of care across the NHS and beyond.

Shocking scandals like Winterbourne View and mid-Staffs have left many people fearing the basic values of compassion, dignity and respect are draining away from the very organisations that should embody them. This year has to be the moment when the high performing majority says ‘enough is enough’.

Transparency is one antidote: innovations like the Friends and Family Test for hospitals, and the proposed Ofsted-style inspections will help identify outliers and support continuous improvement across the system.

The NHS Commissioning Board (NHS CB) will be responsible for overseeing and championing quality for their patients, both in its role as the direct commissioner of primary care and other services as well as its oversight of CCGs. As I set out in the Mandate I will hold the NHS CB to account to deliver these services and quality of care on behalf of patients and the taxpayer.

In short, a new year always separates out the optimists from the pessimists, and 2013 is no different. Many argue this will be the NHS’s most challenging year. But with GPs at the heart of policy and practice, I believe it will turn out being one of its best.

Jeremy Hunt MP is the secretary of state for health.

Readers' comments (14)

  • Will we reduce the debate to an absurd choice between optimism and pessimism?
    What about pragmatism?
    Pragmatic younger Dr's are choosing careers in secondary care,others who trained as GP's are already declining to join partnerships and pragmatic older GP's are choosing to leave them.
    Good luck lecturing to an empty room missing an audience.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Nhsfatcat

    Sink or swim!
    Imposition of contract, QoF, QP, CCG, revalidation, CQC, no relaistic increase in funding, increasing population, increasing age, shift of 2ndry work and pension threats is like stapping us to concrete blocks, throwing us in the water and screaming at us to swim harder and faster.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • you want to reduce preventable illness but are of a govt that promotes the interest of big tobacco and junk food.
    You want to reduce the cost of the NHS by making sure private companies & management consultants enjoy profits with a taxpayer guarantee.
    Hmmm. Evil genius or idiot?

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Sorry to say it will be soon sink ,sink time for you sadly when public reacts to the half thought measures and when professions refuse to co-operate.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Does he not understand that most GPs have'nt even got the time to reply to this pie in the sky claptrap?

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Here today gone tomorrow politicians who access private care for themselves and their families. Stupid optimism with £20bn of cuts and more money going to profits just like PFI. As for PFI it will all come unstuck in a few year's time - when Hunt and his mis-pronounced name are forgotten.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • I am certainly not intending to swim in a pool I did not choose to enter, and neither am i intending to sink, by trying to carry to much weight.

    Keeping both feet on the ground will be my approach, which will allow me to run when it all gets a bit too much....

    (remember, the experienced GPs you need are the ones closest to their pension)

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Jeremy Hunt is a daft clot

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • The treadmill has gone up too many notches. Something has to give.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • I have worked in a system that introduced online consultations - it was chaos - the consultations never stopped - by that I mean they never finished (and the volume went up each week) we ended up having 300 fruitless "stream of consciousness" email-style rambles" rather than a proper consultation. The most shocking (and terminal event) was the consultation with a patient only to realise part way through that the thread had been hijacked by the parent.

    Scary when it happens

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

View results 10 results per page20 results per page

Have your say