This site is intended for health professionals only

At the heart of general practice since 1960

pul jul aug2020 cover 80x101px
Read the latest issue online

Independents' Day

'It is neither fair nor reasonable to blame GPs for the crisis in A&E'

House of Commons health committee chair Dr Sarah Wollaston gives her view on the urgent care crisis

It is neither fair nor reasonable to blame GPs for the crisis in A&E when clearly it is a complex whole-system issue with its roots in a workforce shortfall and the longest financial squeeze in the history of the NHS and social care.

During the Health Committee's inquiry into primary care it was clear that if you are asking GPs to staff co-located clinics in A&E as well as 8-8 routine services seven days a week, there simply isn't the workforce capacity to do this in all areas without undermining the capacity to staff urgent out of hours and weekday in hours services.

In some rural areas patients could end up having to travel further to visit a Sunday surgery than an existing out of hours provider. We have also yet to properly address the issue of sharing records safely and efficiently between federated practices. We need CCGs to be able to plan the most effective solution for their local area not a one-size-fits-all approach imposed from above.

The National Audit Office report highlighted that the costs of providing out-of-hours routine appointments is very significantly higher than the cost of providing an in-hours routine appointments. When finances are tight, it is especially important to be realistic about what else could be delivered with the same money.

I think the comments from Number 10 demonstrate a misunderstanding of the pressures on primary care and that their work goes far beyond sitting face to face in surgeries. Visits, complex administration, reviewing results, liaising with colleagues and a host of other tasks.

Primary care has changed and in particularly the age profile of patients and the complexity of their long term conditions. Many more people are now cared for in the community who would previously have been cared for within inpatient or specialist settings but the funding to match did not follow into primary care. Government should focus attention on supporting the forward view for general practice rather than undermining morale or taking a heavy handed approach to seven day routine services.

A cross party committee of the House of Lords is shortly expected to report on long term sustainable funding for the NHS and social care and we should closely examine their findings alongside the work of others including the Barker Commission.

We also need to make it clear that there are consequences if we do nothing. The best chance of success will come with a cross-party approach to providing sustainable long term funding. I think it is the right time in the political cycle for that to happen and we need urgent action given the scale of the ongoing demographic and demand challenge.

I will continue to meet with colleagues to try to set out the complexity and pressures not only in primary care but across the entire health and care sector and to press for a better political response.

Dr Sarah Wollaston is the Conservative MP for Totnes in Devon, the chair of the House of Commons health committee and a former GP.

Readers' comments (4)

  • " The best chance of success will come with a cross-party approach to providing sustainable long term funding."
    As advocated by yourself, and Dr Mcartney in her latest book,which is essentially the catechism of the college.
    Therefore this is also the college approach.
    The list goes on
    Such an approach would result in great honour for the architects.
    It would relieve all politicians, of all parties, of any responsibility
    It would relieve the vast inefficient beaurocracy of any accountability.
    However it would also disenfranchise the population in perpetuity.
    In short a plan to suit all the vested interests, and leave the population powerless.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Vinci Ho

    This is a part of my longer comment on another article today:

    ''And for our dear Sarah(Wollaston), we like to see more from you ,presuming that you are standing firm for NHS and social care . Merely asking our GP colleagues to invite their MPs to come to their workplace or asking the prime minister to apologise, is NOT ENOUGH , my honourable lady. My suggestion is : like some of your party colleagues(as well as those in opposition),you can resign and trigger a by-election in your constituency. Run the election independently with a manifesto of saving NHS/GP/social care with more funding (raising tax , money from Brexit's promise or whatever), I am pretty sure you will be re-elected with a good margin and a brighter halo on top of your head,in contrast to the 'tragic' story of Zack Goldsmith. As long as you remain in your party , you are still in the 'mix' threatening you to grovel in front of your party . A Tory is a Tory , always a Tory?''

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • A sensible way forward.
    Unfortunately you're in the wrong party if you want common sense to prevail.
    Resigning from the 'nasty' party would gain you barrel loads more respect from your colleagues.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • It is quite the other way around.
    GP workloads sky rocket because of lack of proper secondary provision for hospital dependent illnesses such as stroke, sepsis, Myocardial infarction etc.
    Long waiting lists, curtailing referrals, early and inappropriate discharges and a host of other problems with secondary care mean that patients who should be seen in hospitals are thronging GP surgeries and we are having to see patients multiple times because they have not been given proper secondary care, preventing us from GPs from using our appointments for primary care.
    Every single day, I have multiple patients whom I see for the umpteenth time because they have not been seen on time by secondary care.
    Hospitals increase GPs workloads, not the other way about.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Have your say