This site is intended for health professionals only

At the heart of general practice since 1960

Losing the independent contractor model could destroy general practice

Last year at Pulse Live I was asked: Where will be general practice be in five years? I replied: ’We may not have any general practice, the way we have known it.’ Pulse editor Nigel Praities appears to concur with my view in his latest editorial, ‘The independent contractor model is being left to die’.

The concept of ‘the family doctor’ would be lost forever

General practice has been hailed as ‘jewel in the crown’ of the NHS. Why? Because, general practice has become responsible for all personal medical care, and is the gateway for individuals to access hospitals, specialist care and sickness benefit, and it’s deemed to be the patient’s advocate. Compared to other parts of the healthcare system, GP services are estimated to be less costly. GP care for a whole year costs less than a single day’s hospital admission. GP consultations cost less than outpatient consultations, accident and emergency and ambulance calls. A face-to-face consultation with a GP costs the NHS about the same as a telephone consultation with a nurse.

For 68 years, GPs have cared for patients and their families from birth to death. They look after all their records and manage their entire healthcare. British general practice is one of the best primary care systems in the world admired and emulated by other countries. For 90% of the British population, the NHS begins and finishes at the GP surgery. There are 350 million consultations with GPs in the UK every year, an average of between four and five visits to the doctor for everyone.

GPs for very good reasons chose to remain outside the NHS (though committed to the NHS values) as independent contractors rather than salaried NHS employees. Despite all the changes that have taken place in the last 68 years, within the system, general practice retains to a large extent core commitment to generalism that is manifested in two key concepts: patient centeredness and holism. Now, to herd GPs en masse into GP federations, would be the most radical and destructive reform of the primary care since 1948.

Primary care is undergoing some significant and worrying changes that demonstrate a lack of value placed on the quality of general practice. The Government appears to be determined to move from traditional GP partnerships to ones where the private sector would play a much greater part in the future structure and running of general practice, with a salaried model. The current changes being imposed across NHS primary care are leading to the meltdown and eventual destruction of general practice in this country. The concept of ‘the family doctor’, so dear to the British public, would be lost forever. When it comes to patients’ health, it is the quality and safety of care they receive that is most important. The result could be that the GP surgery goes the same way as the NHS dentist. Most importantly, the Government is prepared to sacrifice the relationship patients have with the family doctor, and jeopardise the safety, quality and continuity of patient care which are the pillars of general practice.

With over 30 years of experience in primary care at all levels, I am sick of seeing money wasted on political ‘innovations’ in the health service. In a politically-led NHS, the politicians and their advisers seem dangerously cavalier, disruptive and distracting. The state is weakening the role of the traditional GP to promote private providers, in the guise of so called integrated care models manned by cheap labour.

We doctors went into medicine to make people better. We don’t want to see the standard of care we provide eroded by ill-thought-out political objectives, and without any proof that they work. Continuity of care is being eroded so fast that I fear that the very concept of a truly generalist service may be permanently lost within a few years.

Dr Kailash Chand OBE is the deputy chair of the BMA, and a retired GP

Readers' comments (6)

  • Hear hear,but I am afraid those making the decisions have their own agenda.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • I hope upon hope that the change in Conservative leadership, Osbournes final realisation that austerity isnt working, Hunt being royally shuffled out of his cabinet post and the likelihood of a general election before 2020 will halt these changes. If not the NHS is going to lose another experienced GP early.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Couldn't agree more!No one spends NHS taxpayers’ cash more efficiently than GPs. For every attendance at a GP instead of A&E, the Taxpayer saves £90. But Jeremy Hunt has made it harder for GPs to do their jobs. He has cut the cash GPs receive by £984 million since 2010. The level of unfilled vacancies has increased manifold since Hunt became health secretary. And his Government is training fewer doctors than we need. Cash is starved, and workforce morale is low. The million dollar question is, what are we going to do about this as a profession? The end of the general practice is nigh!

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • A salaried service is easier to control . Competition is supposed to make things cheaper and drive "quality". These iron rules of the market are central to Conservative thinking. The Independent Contractor status will linger on in those areas where it is easy to recruit but elsewhere we are already seeing it disintegrate. Those of us lucky to have largely spent their lives working in a properly funded Independent Contractor manner know what is now being strangled but pretty soon that will be just a memory and our stating that it was better in the old days will be smiled upon and ignored as the foolish ramblings of old (largely) men.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Pulse is perhaps in best position to promote a campaign to 'Save independent contractor' model of general practice . All other models,including salary model could be incorporated ?

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Not could destroy but will destroy..or is it already dead?

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Have your say