Cookie policy notice

By continuing to use this site you agree to our cookies policy below:
Since 26 May 2011, the law now states that cookies on websites can ony be used with your specific consent. Cookies allow us to ensure that you enjoy the best browsing experience.

This site is intended for health professionals only

At the heart of general practice since 1960

QOF exercise targets are at risk of becoming another meaningless ‘tick-box’

It’s great that the QOF now covers physical activity, writes Dr Ricky Shamji, but concerns over the use of the GPPAQ tool to assess exercise habits must be addressed before next year

It’s been a long time coming but finally, physical activity has been introduced in the 2013/14 QOF indicators for hypertension. This has to be welcomed. Evidence shows that physical inactivity is the biggest public health threat of the 21st century.1

There is not one single solution for increasing activity – and our efforts are futile if we see no investment in school programmes, transport policies, urban regulations and infrastructure – but we should not underestimate our unique position and power to influence patients. The average patient sees us four times a year, and the average surgery will see nearly 80% of its patients at least once a year. We are therefore in the ideal position to help our patients when they reach their point of curiosity or willingness to change.

Practical application

Many of us feel deflated by the seemingly unachievable QOF changes this year and, because of this, the new contract may have drawn GPs’ attention away from the physical activity agenda. In future, we are likely to see further physical activity indicators added for other diseases, but before NICE does this, we need feedback on the quality of the current indicators, and their practical application during consultations.

The tool used to record physical activity status in the QOF this year is the GPPAQ. It is a validated tool for identifying activity status but, like many tools that come from academia, translating it into practice usually has its hiccups.  Although the GPPAQ the simplest validated tool out there, it has a few issues that we all need to be aware of if we are to fully understand and use it.

Some of your patients may have been calculated as being ‘less than active’ despite religiously doing, as guidance tells us, 150 minutes of moderate intensity activity, such as brisk walking, per week. This is because the level of activity ‘result’, despite featuring in the questionnaire, does not consider DIY, housework and walking.

The reason for this is due to over-reporting of these activities. Many GPs still don’t know about this basic problem.

Furthermore, you need to use a computer to generate a result from the GPPAQ and even though this means that we don’t lose time calculating things ourselves, the way a patient’s activity level is calculated is unclear for both the patient and doctor. As a doctor or a patient it’s important to understand the method used to reach a diagnosis or conclusion. Using this particular tool is confusing as it doesn’t acknowledge the simple recommendation that everyone should do 150 minutes of moderate intensity a week. Try it yourself now - if you input into the GPPAQ that you do 150 minutess of brisk walking a week, it says that you are not active.

No more ‘tickbox’ culture

I am not suggesting that the GPPAQ is wrong - it’s a validated tool - but if we are going to induce physical activity discussion with our patients smoothly then it is really important that both parties understand the mechanics of how physical activity is measured in the first place.

My overriding fear is that the GPPAQ will follow in the footsteps of the PHQ9 (or similar depression scores). Emphasis on completing the PHQ9 had begun to take over the process of exploring the biopsychological issues which by its own virtue is part of the management of depression. Patient information does not work - patients need engagement and well-targeted messages. Using tools like the GPPAQ and the PHQ9 distracts the clinician from fully exploring a patient’s beliefs before offering advice.

If the GPPAQ is here to stay then before it is introduced to other indicators, we need to make sure we provide feedback on whether this current format works for GPs in practice and so I urge NICE to listen to GP concerns before writing the GPPAQ into the QOF again next year.

Introducing indicators to measure physical activity was a good first step but, going forward, we must make sure that we give this major health threat the correct care and attention it deserves.   

Dr Ricky Shamji is a GP in Birmingham

Reference

1 Blair S. Physical inactivity: the biggest public health problem of the 21st century. Br J Sports Med 2009;43:1-2.

Readers' comments (6)

  • Listen. qof is a waste of time that offers little benefit to patients. why we are wasting time on computer tick box exercises instead of focussing on the suffering of our patients is beyond me.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Never mind that, trouble is GP's please remember that to fill this in properly and give appropriate advice takes time. In our usual 10 minute appointment slot for a Bp check its just not possible to address this as well
    Me - "tell me how much walking you do in the course of a week?
    Patient " well nurse I always walk down to the shop on Wed and Sat morings , that takes 10 minutes each way, then I go to Book Club on a Thu night thats at Mrs So n so's now its quite far so I just go to the bus stop ......and then on a Saturday....then of course the dog has to go out......"
    and thats before you have even started to ask about housework and childcare!! - an overworked Practice Nurse.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • GPPAQ doesn't include running as an activity! I have to code this as fast walking.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • 'At risk of being a meaningless tickboxing exercise!

    Don't be daft it IS a meaningless box ticking exercise along with the rest of QOF.

    I took VER because I used to enjoy treating people and hated treating computer templates. I must say it was the best decision I have ever made by far.

    Get out ASAP if you can and certainly don't choose GP if you are starting out in medicine in the UK!

    Hang on a minute get the NHS to train you then emigrate to a place where you will get job satisfaction!

    I'm off to the beach now.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • I don't mind working hard. But working harder and harder doing complete rubbish, taking hours filling in more forms and plans that no one sees or is slightly interested in such as complex co morbidity. In spite of all this extra, unwanted and complete trashy work, our pay keeps falling.
    Why do we have to stay in such a NHS ? Can we, must we not absolutely leave this fatuous crap.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • I am working on leaving the NHS next year when I will be 50. I plan to do overseas locums to completely avoid the dysfunctional system that we have.

    The NHS is going to collapse due to the crazy reforms. I am not willing to risk my health anymore.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Have your say