This site is intended for health professionals only

At the heart of general practice since 1960

pulse june2020 80x101px
Read the latest issue online

GPs go forth

Rocketing CQC fees will worsen patient care

Dr Peter Swinyard 

If I choose to prescribe an expensive drug instead of a cheaper drug, I will have assessed the cost/benefit ratio of this for the patient before making a decision. There will be evidence of effectiveness.

But this does not apply to the CQC and its proposed imposition of massive fee increases.

We have just about swallowed hard and accepted the current level of taxation by CQC - £725 for my practice of just over 5,000 patients. But this will go up to £4,839 under these proposed changes. This is just not affordable.

Small practices such as mine have no spare resources to pay this impost

NHS England have muttered about putting another £15m into the contract to pay for this. No. That won’t work. A practice of 14,999 patients will be charged as much as one with 5,001 and we all know that most payments and reimbursements are capitation dependent – also practices which still rely on a large MPIG (remember – promised in perpetuity!) will lose out on this unless very carefully done. Over to you, GPC on that one.

Small practices such as mine have no spare resources to pay this impost. It will mean reducing either receptionist time (we run very tight on that) or making half our health care assistant time redundant. Or reducing one of the salaried doctors’ time by a session a fortnight. How does this help patient care?

Even if NHS England choose to reimburse us completely (unlikely, I think) many of us would still resent the unevidenced use of scarce NHS funds just because the Secretary of State believes it a good idea. He also ‘believes’ in homeopathy.

The basic problem with GPs paying for CQC inspections is that, by and large, we don’t believe in them. We have seen no specific evidence that our colleagues in Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland are working any less safely than we are in England without the imposition of a CQC inspection. I have never heard my colleagues from outside England bemoaning their lack of inspection.

This is a quango which is answerable only to a select committee once a year and to the Secretary of State for Health. The directors seem supine and the bureaucracy bewildering.

General practice remains the lowest risk part of the NHS. Poorly performing practices are well known in the local health economies. If inspection must happen, concentrate on them. Support them to improve. Don’t just tell everyone they are failing. That is a self-fulfilling prophecy as no doctor or nurse will choose to work at a practice labelled ’failing’ and many patients will also vote with their feet.

Be brave, Mr Hunt. Accept that the CQC has failed to cause any improvement in real quality. Do their appraisal. Do their 360 degree. Do their revalidation. Then you will realise that they have not passed and should pass as a footnote in the history of the NHS.

Dr Peter Swinyard is a GP in Swindon, Wiltshire, and chair of the Family Doctor Association


Rate this article  (5 average user rating)

Click to rate

  • 1 star out of 5
  • 2 stars out of 5
  • 3 stars out of 5
  • 4 stars out of 5
  • 5 stars out of 5

0 out of 5 stars

Readers' comments (7)

  • What happens if all practices refuse to pay the price hike. All of them... The CQC can't fail them all...

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • When all practices do anything together, - pigs will fly.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Leave the NHS and base fees on the resources of time needed to do the job safely.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Can somebody explain if there is a flaw in these figures:

    The CQC is half funded by the Government and half by Providers.

    The 2015 /16 CQC Income is: Government £120 million and Providers £113 million.

    Therefore a 40% decrease by Government amounts to £48 million which it expects providers to pick up on(!).
    Nevertheless £48 million added to our £113 million should be a 42% increase next year (not the 85% proposed)with inflationary increases after that ( and not a 667% increase by 2019/20).

    This begs the question of what the CQC is hoping to do with the eventual 667% it is asking for!

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • become a locum and stick 2 fingers up at CQC inspection costs.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment


    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Why has there been so little comment about the recent reporting of the huge CQC inspection team hotel costs ....(sometimes allegedly involving luxury hotel fees of £224 per night and racking up bills in excess of £80,000 for a single Dorset hospital inspection by as many as 100 staff). Who is holding the CQC to account? Where is the CQC financial probity here ? Why can't they utilise staff who live within a reasonable commuting distance? No wonder they want to increase their funding!

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Have your say