Cookie policy notice

By continuing to use this site you agree to our cookies policy below:
Since 26 May 2011, the law now states that cookies on websites can ony be used with your specific consent. Cookies allow us to ensure that you enjoy the best browsing experience.

This site is intended for health professionals only

At the heart of general practice since 1960

What we told Jeremy Hunt when he visited our practice

Dr Paul Maddy describes what he told Jeremy Hunt when the Health Secretary visited his practice in Leeds

Jeremy Hunt - SUO

Jeremy Hunt - SUO

Jeremy Hunt visited our practice a few weeks ago and spent an hour listening to our views on the current state of general practice.

He arrived at the practice with two office assistants, just as we were finishing our weekly partners’ meeting, so it was four partners and our practice business manager who met with him.

We sat him down with a mug of tea and he seemed quite happy to sit and talk with us rather than have a grand tour. The concerns we expressed will not come as a surprise to any GP: funding, micromanagement, recruitment and retention, workload, trust & feeling valued.

We started by telling him that core funding is no longer sufficient to run a practice. We have to rely on income from multiple incentive schemes and enhanced services. We have too many pots of money which can only be spent on specific things and accounting for this needs multiple spreadsheets and a bureaucratic overhead.

Next, we told him that micromanagement of what we do in general practice distorts care and is a key cause of the increased stress felt by GPs. Professionals want to do a good job and Government should trust them to get on with it.

At this point Mr Hunt expressed a keenness to reduce the number of targets we have, but we told him it’s no good just replacing these with numerous ‘measures’ as has happened previously.

The opinions he was expressing in private to us weren’t how his opinions and actions were perceived in public

We also told Jeremy Hunt that trust and respect are key tenets of healthcare. Doctors (initially GPs, then consultants and now junior doctors) are vilified by Government and the press. People like to feel valued and trusted. It is a key component of the doctor-patient relationship and should be part of the government-doctor relationship.

We also addressed the issues of recruiting and retaining staff. Our practice lost a well-loved and experienced GP to unexpected early retirement last year. A more manageable workload and feeling valued by Government may have made a difference to her decision. We struggled to recruit for a replacement and additional doctor. We reminded him that there were unfilled GP training scheme places in Yorkshire last year and over 50% of F2 doctors decided to defer entering specialist training – a sad indictment of confidence in the future of the NHS.

Mr Hunt listened as we told him that there is a relentless increase in the workload in general practice: both in intensity and complexity. We have been working longer hours because we had been unable to recruit. He expressed confidence in his previous announcement that there would be an additional 5,000 GPs by the end of their term in Government.

On a couple of occasions I pointed out to him that the opinions he was expressing in private to us weren’t how his opinions and actions were perceived in public.

My daughter is a specialist trainee and we had medical students on placement with us, so we naturally discussed the junior doctor dispute. This was the only time he went into a politician mode of speaking to justify his position on this.

On his way out we showed him how time-consuming scanning on incoming correspondence was - I had pointed out that it would be much more efficient all round for hospital correspondence to be generated and transmitted to us electronically as a CDA message. The primary care GP systems are capable of consuming these messages but secondary care could do with some central direction to use this message format rather than come up with multiple different messaging systems across the country (he promised to look into this). We also gave him a quick overview of the Leeds Care Record - a real-time portal view of key patient data pulled from different health and social care units used for direct patient’s care.

Mr Hunt spent most of the hour listening to us. Only time will tell if this had any impact.

Dr Paul Maddy is a GP in Leeds

Rate this article  (4.47 average user rating)

Click to rate

  • 1 star out of 5
  • 2 stars out of 5
  • 3 stars out of 5
  • 4 stars out of 5
  • 5 stars out of 5

0 out of 5 stars

Readers' comments (12)

  • Unfortunately it will be in one ear and our the other. Can't believe he hasn't heard it all before and filled the findings on his internal trash can.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • What was the purpose of his visit exactly? Was it so that one of the partners would write about their experience in the GP press to give the impression that he is listening?
    Hook, line.....

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Just to be clear, we approached Dr Maddy independently

  • He clearly doesn't listen otherwise we wouldn't be in this position. Unless he is listening so that he can find more weaknesses to exploit

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • I wouldn't have wasted the time, myself. Listening, even assuming he was, is no use without comprehension and the will to make useful changes rather than those driven by political dogma. I suspect he has selective deafness when "listening" to real doctors.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • What you told him? If it wasn't an obscenity you should hang your head in shame.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • But if you don't sit down and talk to him, how can you blame him when he doesn't listen? He probably won't listen to BMA or LMC or groups as they are all trade union types, and he's a Tory. Individuals maybe.
    Good on the author.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • How sad and indicative of the low morale and anxiety about persecution that the majority of comments are now "Anonymous". Speaks volumes about the state of the NHS.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • If he hadn't heard this before he is incompetent, if he has heard it before then he must be satisfied with it....You decide

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Where did you source the Polonium then?

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • But well done to you for telling it as it is. We all need to keep saying it and what is even more important we need to say it to our patients so that thy, in turn, say it to the local MPs who then put pressure back on him. Polititians hate being undermined by their own party and they are very sensitive to the views and moods of other MPs. We are all important cogs in a very large political wheel. We need to keep driving forward and gather momentum until the understanding of what is being done to the NHS and the will to pull it round is an unstopable force. Democracy is being unrdermined but dont underestimate the power of democratic fight back by voters.. Votes are the biggest currency of politicians..

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

View results 10 results per page20 results per page

Have your say