Cookie policy notice

By continuing to use this site you agree to our cookies policy below:
Since 26 May 2011, the law now states that cookies on websites can ony be used with your specific consent. Cookies allow us to ensure that you enjoy the best browsing experience.

This site is intended for health professionals only

At the heart of general practice since 1960

GP winter access to be audited using 'third next available appointment'

NHS England is set to collect 'potentially misleading' appointment data, GP leaders have said, as details of its new system to track access are unveiled.

Under the scheme to run through winter, practices will be asked when its ‘third next available routine appointment is’.

An email to practices from NHS England’s primary care team explains they will all receive a call in a bid to show ‘theoretically’ how long a patient would wait for an appointment, and to ‘quantify the pressure’ on practices.

NHS England said the call should take no more than four minutes, with practices told to brief receptionists to expect the first contact to be made in October.

Pulse reported earlier this month that NHS bosses were looking to collect appointment data to address a 'lack of understanding' around winter pressures.

But GP leaders said this method showed NHS England is out to ‘document disaster’.

And the BMA’s GP Committee warned this method takes no account of the variations in practice appointment systems that may prioritise telephone triage or emergency appointments and could produce ‘misleading’ results.

A letter to the profession from GPC workload management lead Dr Matt Mayer adds that it is ‘entirely voluntary’ but this is not mentioned in the letter from NHS England, seen by Pulse.

The letter circulated to practices in its Midlands and East region says: ‘NHS England has commissioned the North of England Commissioning Support Unit (CSU) to collect third next appointment data from each general practice in England.

‘The collection aims to better understand waiting times in general practice as well as quantify the pressure practice is under.

‘The data collected will give an indication of the amount of time in days a patient would theoretically need to have waited for an appointment at the time a booking was made.’

But Dr Mayer’s letter says: ‘GPC have expressed their deep concerns to NHS England regarding the potentially misleading or poor quality data this survey may produce, especially given the vast variability in appointment systems from practice to practice.'

He adds that there is a possibility emergency appointments or other modes of access ‘will not be accurately assessed’.

GPC is also concerned by the cost of such a survey ‘when general practice itself is collapsing due to chronic under-funding.’

Family Doctor Association chair Dr Peter Swinyard said: ‘I don’t know any practice that I talk to which has the availability which we would all like.

‘The amount of time used up on administrative stuff and on health surveillance, QOF chasing and so on is vastly more than it was and there is no way we can actually offer the service we want to. So they are just trying to document disaster.’

He also suggested figures may be ‘gamed’ because pressed practices would fear repercussions.

He said: ‘The bottom line is, if practices are honest and say “look, we’re stuffed, we haven’t got any appointments”, they will probably get a little visit from NHS England saying “why aren’t you complying with your contract?”

‘And so people will game the system and say the third available appointment is the next day.’

This week Pulse reported comments by RCGP chair Professor Helen Stokes-Lampard, who said practices were already ‘gaming’ access targets as they could ill-afford to lose the funding.

The college has previously said waiting times are a ‘risk to patient safety’ after a Pulse survey showed average waits remain at two weeks - despite efforts to boost access.

What does the GPC advise practices to do when they are contacted?

The GPC says GP practices are 'under no obligation' to respond to the survey, but adds that for those who 'wish to do so', it advises:

  • Direct the call to the practice manager or another suitable manager. If no such person is immediately available, then take a return contact number and instruct the caller that someone will call them back later;
  • The person giving the data should tell the caller when the third next available routine appointment with a doctor is;
  • Appointments which can be booked into a locality hub are valid for the purposes of this survey, and the third next available routine appointment should be given;
  • If no such routine appointment exists due to the design of your appointment system (eg: total triage, on-the-day, nurse triage etc) then inform the caller you are unable to answer the question, and explain the reason for this.

Readers' comments (15)

  • I'm sure the regional administrators in China and Russian communist famines kept reporting rising grain yields as millions of peasants died, as they would be held responsible for a famine otherwise.

    Obviously not related at all to the article above and the NHS.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • I must admit that I was a bit shocked to be told that I had to wait three weeks for an appointment to get a referral for my BCC removal. I asked the receptionist to check that was right with the GP. Obviously I didn't want an emergency appointment but neither do I want to walk around with a BCC longer than is necessary.
    Is this sort of wait the norm now? (I am retired from General Practice but that would not have been the case in my time as a GP).

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • This is AVAILABILITY not access, which I have always said is the key to effective primary care. And you can tell Dr Swinyard The Old Links Surgery in St Annes has the same day availability as the routine and we won't be the only ones. However we are a traditional small practice that has no future within modern primary care according to DOH.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • good to hear that my old sixth form colleague Peter Swinyard continues to give a first class service. At our surgery we try to do the same and are actively fighting off attempts to get us all to merge. The latest nonsense was funding for us to see patients from other surgeries and vice versa but not if we see our own patients. Then they want us to set up provider companies and take over responsibility for local A&E GPs, and the local urgent treatment centre and weekend extended access - there is no workforce out there to do these slots and it will destabilise OOH. Why are some colleagues so keen to take on this extra poison chalice?? We just need to keep general practice alive in the way that patients prefer - in local group practices. Not in mega 50k surgeries.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Three weeks is often the norm for routine surgeries these days - I even got to 5 recently. Most surgeries offer either doctor triage or book on day slots for acute illnesses. It would fall if people stopped using 'urgent' slots for chronic problems but that's a training issue and is very difficult to solve. There is also a huge lack of GPs with vacancies all over the country. In the meantime the government are telling patients to 'consult your GP' at every opportunity and telling the public that everything is an emergency and they can have it all simply by picking up a smartphone.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • This is complete nonsense.

    I wait a month for a routine dental appointment, 6-8 weeks for a routine scan appointment and two months down the line, I'm still waiting for my physiotherapy appointment to come through.

    What's wrong with waiting 2-3 weeks for a GP appointment if it's not urgent? We triage all same day appointment requests so the urgent things get seen same day or next day.

    Ruth Nixon - if you think your BCC is urgent then tell the receptionist this. Most practices have a system for dealing with urgent care.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Doctor McDoctor Face

    Given that the public voted for continuation of NHS destructive austerity I couldn't actually care less any more how long the wait to see me is. You got what they voted for. Moan to your MP not me. GP is not a social punishment its JUST a job.

    BCC are relatively benign and dont have any GP or dermatology urgency.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • I am sure beautiful graphs will be fashioned as a result, elegantly cataloguing the decline and eventual collapse of General Practice, maybe just maybe the efforts should be at supporting primary care rather than documenting it's extinction

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • What a waste of resources!!!

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • I agree NHSE is a waste of resources.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

View results 10 results per page20 results per page

Have your say