Cookie policy notice

By continuing to use this site you agree to our cookies policy below:
Since 26 May 2011, the law now states that cookies on websites can ony be used with your specific consent. Cookies allow us to ensure that you enjoy the best browsing experience.

This site is intended for health professionals only

At the heart of general practice since 1960

Government urged to explore salaried GP service by Lords

The traditional model of general practice is 'no longer fit for purpose' and the Government should explore a future where GPs are under its 'direct employment', an influential committee has recommended.

The House of Lords Committee on the Long-term Sustainability of the NHS, set up in May last year to scrutinise the Government's longer term planning for healthcare, said that the 'small business model' of general practice is 'inhibiting change' that is necessary to put the NHS on a sustainable footing.

The committee also criticised successive governments for their 'short-sightedness' and failure to plan for the longer term of health services in general, recommending that an independent 'Office for Health and Care Sustainability' is established look 15-20 years into the future.

On general practice, the report said: 'The traditional small business model of general practice is no longer fit for purpose and is inhibiting change. NHS England, with the help of the Department of Health and the profession, should conduct a review to examine alternative models and their contractual implications.

'The review should assess the merits of engaging more GPs through direct employment which would reflect arrangements elsewhere in the NHS.'

Lord Patel, chair of the committee, a cross-bench peer and an obstetrician, said there was 'a shocking lack of long-term strategic planning in the NHS', with the Department of Health 'failing to think beyond the next few years'.

He said that 'to solve this we need a new body that is independent of government and is able to identify clearly the healthcare needs of a changing and ageing population and the staffing and funding the NHS will require to meet those needs', which 'will need to look ahead and plan for 15-20 years into the future'.

He added: 'We also think it is time to look at the way care is delivered. This may well involve changing the model where GPs are self-employed small businesses.

'Delivering health care fit for the 21st century requires improvement in primary care to relieve pressure on hospitals. That change should be delivered by GPs.'

Dr Patel also said that the Government 'will need to recognise the NHS will need more money', with NHS spending needing to 'rise at least as fast as GDP for 10 years after 2020'.

In all, the committee's work concluded with 34 recommendations, also including:

  • Following years of NHS pay restraint, the Government should commission an independent review to 'examine the impact of pay on morale and retention';
  • The DH should become the 'Department of Health and Care', with responsibility for adult social care at a national level 'to allow money and resources to be used more effectively';
  • The Government should stop cuts to funding for the public health budget which are are 'short-sighted and counter-productive';
  • And it should clarify to patients, via the NHS Constitution, their responsibility for their own health, while also running a national campaign highlighting the danger of obesity.

Commenting on the findings, RCGP chair Professor Helen Stokes-Lampard said that although GPs are 'open to new ways of working', there was 'no one-size-fits-all approach' and GP practices 'must be able to choose the best ways of working to offer services that local populations want and need'.

She said: 'The independent contractor model of general practice service delivery brings important benefits and must be nurtured and maintained as an option going forward.

'It has been a trail blazer for innovation in general practice and created the excellent service that patients rely on and value, as well as providing great value for money to the NHS. This continues today with many GP partnerships taking the lead in developing new models of care.

'The college recognises that the partnership model in some areas is struggling – principally as a result of years of underfunding, and recruitment difficulties – but this is not a reason to give up on it.'

GPs being pushed out of partnership?

In a hearing with the Lords committee in December last year, NHS England chief executive Simon Stevens said that GPs were willing to consider 'radical' changes to their model of practise because they have been 'systematically under-invested in'.

As for the future of the small business model, NHS England announced plans to incentivise all GP practices to work in networks covering 30-50,000 patients

And Pulse has previously reported on the partners jumping ship from their GP practices, amid sustained underfunding of general practice.

Meanwhile, more than half of partners have said they are willing to consider a salaried role if offered the right deal.

Readers' comments (18)

  • Actually what needs to happen is medical staff need to all become selfg employed in one way or another - the model of NHS employing medics doesnt work - it wouldnt be affordable - or indeed possible for GPs to work for as salaried for a trust - unless law is changed - each contract would need to go out to tender

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Lord Patel has spotted that more money is needed, but will DOH listen to him or any independent body eg Kings fund? It is not fair to say that the independent contractor model has failed, it has been bled dry. Cut funding to the House of Lords and watch it fail. A salaried GP service will be massively inefficient with GPs refusing to see all the extra patient and sick leave etc etc.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • The independent contractor model is without doubt the most cost-effective. It allow unlimited workload to be heaped on practices without the protection that would come with an employed status. The DoH know this but will not admit it in public. I will be amazed if a salaried service was to emerge.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • I totally agree Krishna. We (independent contractors) are the most cost efficient solution until we all drop down with exhaustion or lose the will to go on and hand back the keys to the office.
    A salaried approach will enhance the deficiencies in staffing as we will do no overtime & focus on our currently non-existent personal lives a bit more and our employer will have to sort out the mess, where at the moment the mess is just conveniently left for us to cope with!

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Obstetrician commenting on general practice
    What can I say!

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • I'm happy for this to happen as long as we are remunerated correctly.

    Just yesterday, I had a retainer GP call me 1/2 way through the afternoon that she can't finish her work as she's run late from morning surgery and I had to bail her out (doing extra visits etc) on top of my usual work. As a salaried GP, I'll be telling her to call her employer and it'll be none of my problem!

    As our juniors are sadly becoming accustomed to this way of working, NHS will find it will not be able to mange primary care in cost effective manner. But soon, it will not be our problem to solve.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Above all else, the UK government is determined to control wage inflation in the public sector, which is why extra funding for general practice has been so tightly rationed compared to hospital Trusts. Historically, extra funds going into practices have resulted in increased GP partner income = wage inflation. Extra funds going into hospital departments resulting in extra staff/consultants = no wage inflation.
    Clearly general practice is starved of funds and desperately needs investment, but any extra funding will initially increase GPs' income before practices will invest in extra staff or services. Historically, following investment, governments have invariably frozen funding to claw back this increase.
    Unfortunately, the only long term solution that would permit consistent investment in general practice by UK governments would be a salaried service.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • SALARIED BY THE GOVERNMENT-JUST LIKE HOSPITAL DOCTORS...GREAT....

    NO MORE GOING TO WORK WHEN UNWELL..."SICKIES JUST LIKE THEY DO IN HOSPITALS.

    WORKING TO TIME...JUST LIKE THEY DO IN HOSPITALS...

    "NOT MY DEPARTMENT"...JUST LIKE THEY DO IN HOSPITALS.

    GREAT FOR ME...NOT FOR THE TAX-PAYER !! BUT IF THAT'S WHAT THE "DAILY CRIMINAL" WANTS FINE BY ME.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Oh great. Another hospital doctor sounding off about how to "fix" general practice. Remember Darzi? For the record, GPs do not exist to relieve pressure on hospitals.The small business model remains fit for the purpose of providing medical care but the current state is of chronic and deliberate underfunding. The purpose for which is is (according to this committee) unfit needs to be explained.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Salaried then is the way forward. At least we can all go sick for 6 months a year on full pay. Once you've got us all salaried you also don't need an NHS England which is a saving of 2 billion.Makes some money sense only don't lose the plot by transferring the goons from NHSE to the newly formed Dept of health and Social Care after giving them hefty redundancy packets as has been the tradition in the NHS.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

View results 10 results per page20 results per page

Have your say

IMPORTANT: On Wednesday 7 December 2016, we implemented a new log in system, and if you have not updated your details you may experience difficulties logging in. Update your details here. Only GMC-registered doctors are able to comment on this site.