Cookie policy notice

By continuing to use this site you agree to our cookies policy below:
Since 26 May 2011, the law now states that cookies on websites can ony be used with your specific consent. Cookies allow us to ensure that you enjoy the best browsing experience.

This site is intended for health professionals only

At the heart of general practice since 1960

Practices to be given £8,000 annual grant to take on GP returners

GPs returning from a period away from UK general practice will be given bursaries of £2,300 a month to work in supervised practices while waiting to be put on the performers list.

NHS England’s new national GP returner scheme, launched today, will also give practices a grant of £8,000 a year pro rata for taking the GPs – the same as training practices are given.

The programme is intended to replace the current regional variation in schemes, which sees some returners being paid nothing or token amounts of £50 a week while going through the process of returning to the performers list.

As part of the scheme, which was trailed by Pulse, NHS England will also simplify the process of returning to the performers list by creating a single contact point.

The scheme, worked up with Health Education England (HEE), the RCGP and the BMA, is the first of NHS England’s ten strategies aimed at increasing GP numbers to be implemented.

As it currently stands, there is huge variation across the country in the process that GPs wishing to return to the performers’ list have to go through, involving the local education and training board and the NHS England area team.

However, under the new scheme, NHS England said the GP National Recruitment Office would offer a ‘single point of contact’ to GPs joining or rejoining the service.

The programme will be available to GPs who have taken time out, for example to practise abroad or to raise a family, but who have previously been on the GMC register and on the NHS England National Performers List (NPL), as well as GPs qualified overseas with no NHS experience.

Unlike the present situation, GP will also be able to apply from overseas before they either return or come to the UK.

The scheme will offer a bursary of £2,300 per month and participants will be given a supervised placement in general practice, NHS England said.

A joint statement by NHS England, HEE, the BMA and the RCGP said: ‘The new scheme will standardise pre-existing schemes providing a consistent single point of contact, via the GP National Recruitment Office, to guide doctors through the system. Doctors will also be able to apply from overseas, before they either return or come to the UK.

‘The scheme will offer a bursary of £2,300 per month and participants will be given a supervised placement in general practice. The placements will be tailored to the needs of doctors to ensure they have the confidence and knowledge needed to be a GP.’

The national returners programme, first recommended in the GP taskforce report, comes after the RCGP warned last year that more than 5,000 doctors who have emigrated or chosen to take early retirement are unable to return to the GP workforce as a result of ‘red tape’.

RCGP chair Dr Maureen Baker said the announcement was ‘encouraging’ after the college’s fight against red tape.

She said: ‘It costs nearly £250,000 to train a GP so it is an absolute travesty for patients and a huge waste of public money if we then lose them to the profession as a result of red tape and outdated regulations.

‘We are confident that if people know that the process is to be simplified and streamlined across the country, there will be many more trained GPs who would consider returning to frontline patient care in the UK, helping to ease the intense workforce and workload pressures currently facing general practice.’

GPC chair Dr Chaand Nagpaul told Pulse: ‘The practice would get the equivalent of a trainer’s grant, which is just over £8,000 annually, pro rata for how long you have the returner for.

‘What I want to be clear on is that we certainly would have liked a higher level of funding, however compared to the current system this does represent a significant improvement.’

He added: ‘The announcement of a new, properly funded induction and refresher scheme is a positive step forward that will be good news for doctors who are seeking a route back into full-time or part-time work as a GP.’

HEE medical director and director of education and quality, Professor Wendy Reid, said: ‘This programme removes some of the barriers seen before for doctors who have had a career break or worked overseas to be supported to return to work in general practice. The scheme aims to bridge the gap between the skills and experience that doctors have had, and those that are required for safe and effective primary care practice in the NHS in England.

‘It also recognises the different learning needs of those returning from work overseas over those from a career break, and those who are seeking orientation and adjustment to English primary care.’

NHS England’s overall GP workforce strategy also includes measures such as incentivising older GPs to stay on working, offering financial incentives to new GPs for working in under-doctored areas and a marketing campaign to medical students.

Pulse Live 2015 Scotland plug

Related images

  • PASSPORT, ABROAD - ONLINE


Readers' comments (38)

  • £27,000 a year ? When GPs in Oz are earning over £100,000 this seems a little optimistic.
    And "bridge the gap between the skills and experience that doctors have had, and those that are required for .. practice in the NHS in England" is utterly patronising to some very experienced Doctors, but entirely typical of the RCGP edumentalists.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Unbelievable - less than current rates for a house officer with no experience at all.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • There are very many experienced retired GPs who would have liked to stay on Performance list, and on occasions do locum work or help their own previous practices.
    These Gps are put off by the Appraisals, revalidations. unnecessary paper work and useless meetings and high Medical and protection defence fees. Appraisals or revalidation do not make one a good GP. It is the experience and keeping up with knowledge that matters.
    In the State OF Missouri In USA retired family doctors have to do 50 hours of postgraduate attendances and they can remain on the register. They do part-time or locum work for their colleagues.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • 1:40pm
    50 hours of CPD (as in Missouri) is also what is required in the UK...but I agree it's the paper work and heavy hand of administration and bureaucracy in appraisal etc etc etc thats killing UK medical practice

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Why does it have to be so difficult? Why can't their be exemptions for GPs working in a similar system to the UK who also are MRCGP holders?

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • I retired from General Practice 4 years ago and am absolutely loving it.
    No amount of money would entice me back even if they did remove all the bull**** associated with the job these days.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • No wonder people dont return. I understand the point if you havebt worked at all for a couple of years but if your practicing elsewhere surely this would just be more experience and make you a better more enlightened doctor (as I found from working in Canada) not worse.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • No one unless absolutely desperate or dragged back due to unfortunate family circumstances (as one colleague of 10 yrs in Oz had to do recently) will do this. A highly experienced GP FRACGP examiner, had to endure 3 months of supervised training on a pittance. As a result as soon as he completed he has left the NHS and vowed never to return. Highly insulting process for UK GPs working in more advanced heatth systems like Australia, Canada or Nz to havr to ensure to have the 'honour' of working in this third rate NHS.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • This is a welcome change. Let's not forget that up until now, returners received a bit fat zero during their supervision period. But the salary should match a GPR especially if they have been a GP for over 20 years in another country and are hugely experienced.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • John Glasspool

    And the Trainer grant about the same I guess? Hmmm....

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

View results 10 results per page20 results per page50 results per page

Have your say