Cookie policy notice

By continuing to use this site you agree to our cookies policy below:
Since 26 May 2011, the law now states that cookies on websites can ony be used with your specific consent. Cookies allow us to ensure that you enjoy the best browsing experience.

This site is intended for health professionals only

At the heart of general practice since 1960

Over half the public still unaware of care.data

More than half of the public have still ‘never heard of’ NHS England’s flagship patient record-sharing scheme, care.data, despite it being delayed to ‘build public understanding’ of its benefits, an Ipsos MORI poll has revealed.

The results of the survey commissioned by the Joseph Rowntree Reform Trust Ltd also found that more than half of the public did not think the scheme should be run on an ‘opt-out’ basis.

It comes as the BMA’s Annual Representatives Meeting voted in favour of a motion stating that care.data should be opt-in only – a policy previously passed by the LMCs Conference.

The GPC has responded to the survey saying the figures demonstrate the ‘woefully inadequate’ understanding amongst the public, which NHS England had failed to address.

GP leaders added that an opt-out system could only ever be justified when patients can give ‘informed consent’ to opt out.

The survey of 1,958 UK adults found that 40% of the public thought their GP should only be allowed to share their data with explicit consent, and 13% said data shouldn’t be shared by GPs under any circumstances.

Around one in four – 27% – of the respondents said GPs should be able to share patient records if they had been informed and given a chance to opt out and 10% thought it should be shared even without informing them.

Just 3% of the public said they understood the care.data scheme very well, with 9% saying they understood a little. But 51% of the public said they had never heard of the scheme and 13% had heard of it but didn’t know what it was.

GPC negotiator and lead on care.data Dr Beth McCarron-Nash told Pulse: ‘The implementation of care.data has been a complete debacle, and although we’ve been given all sorts of reassurances, the problems are certainly not fixed. Certainly the whole issue of public awareness really has not been addressed.

‘Our position is very clear: an opt-out is only ever appropriate if all patients are able to give informed consent to opt out. And as this Ipsos MORI survey demonstrates, the level of information in the public is woefully inadequate and that must be urgently addressed.

‘The figures on opt-outs are extremely concerning, this survey appears to reflect that patients have a differing view to the public and are calling now for an opt in. That was the view of LMC conference and we wait to see what happens in the BMA debate.’

Motion in full

That this Meeting agrees that the care.data system should not continue in its present form as:

i. it lacks confidentiality and there is a possibility for individual patient data to be identified

ii. it carries the risk of GPs losing the trust of their patients who may feel constrained in confiding in them

iii. the future potential users of the data are not well defined

iv. it should be an opt-in system rather than an opt-out one

v. the data should only be used for its stated purpose for improving patient care and not sold for profit.

 

Readers' comments (2)

  • Vinci Ho

    For those who has blind faith on this , I help you to provide an answer,' this sample is not big enough to reflect the whole population'

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • I have lost trust in the NHS and would never agree to any sharing of information, simply because they cannot be trusted.
    Some GP's are setting up their own companies and selling those services to the NHS, which also allows patient data to be sent outside of the NHS.
    In my area a company is being sent up to mange blood tests, so again patient data will be sent to these companies, again outside of the NHS ... but GP's, although against care.data are happy to pass on patient information to these private companies.
    It does appear that the DPA no longer serves purpose, as long as a company provides a service to the NHS, anything can be shared! the more folk that share information, the greater the risk of information falling into the wrong hands.

    I have no confidence whatsoever in the NHS keeping information about me confidential.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Have your say

IMPORTANT: On Wednesday 7 December 2016, we implemented a new log in system, and if you have not updated your details you may experience difficulties logging in. Update your details here. Only GMC-registered doctors are able to comment on this site.