Cookie policy notice

By continuing to use this site you agree to our cookies policy below:
Since 26 May 2011, the law now states that cookies on websites can ony be used with your specific consent. Cookies allow us to ensure that you enjoy the best browsing experience.

This site is intended for health professionals only

At the heart of general practice since 1960

Can GPs survive yet another pay cut?

Practices are balancing on a knife-edge, finds Jaimie Kaffash

Pound coin - online

For the eighth time in nine years, it is likely that GPs will see a reduction in take-home earnings – but this year could be the worst of the lot.

The 1.16% funding uplift announced by Government, far from achieving the intended 1% take-home pay increase for GPs, is likely to be wiped out quickly by increases in expenses.

In what GPs see as yet another kick in the teeth, the Government calculated the award using a formula discredited by the GPC and abandoned by the independent pay review body itself.

As a result, accountants warn this could effectively translate into an unprecedented pay cut of up to 10% for GPs.

GPs are warning that they can no longer put off staff pay rises, having been forced to do so by previous pay awards.

Others say this may leave them with no choice but to cut back on services, or even push them closer to the precipice of closure.

This is despite NHS England saying it ‘wants a new deal’ for general practice in its five-year plan, and the health secretary repeatedly saying he wants to shift funding towards general practice.

Last month, Earl Howe referred to the ‘strong economy’ that has allowed the Government to grant GPs a pay rise of 1%, in line with the recommendation by the Review Body on Doctors’ and Dentists’ Remuneration (DDRB).

But to calculate what level of award was needed to deliver a 1% pay increase, the Department of Health used a funding formula that the DDRB itself had stopped using this year as it had failed to deliver previous pay increases, resulting in only 0.16% being given to cover practice expenses from April. 

This fed into an overall uplift to the global sum of 3% in England – although much of this will be paid for by cutting other forms of funding such as MPIG and discontinued DESs, leaving winners and losers. As Pulse went to press, the funding uplift for practices in Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland were yet to be announced.

GPC chair Dr Chaand Nagpaul says the pay award will not address the ‘extreme pressures’ affecting general practice.

DDRB Graph - April pay feature box out

Family Doctor Association chair, Dr Peter Swinyard, is even more damning.

He says: ‘The “pay rise” will do nothing for recruitment or retention, especially for partners – it is undoubtedly a major pay cut after expenses rise inexorably. I regret that this short-sighted settlement will not satisfy the need for an increase in GP provision nor stop the closure of practices at risk.’

Accountants immediately said the award would in effect mean a pay cut for GP partners of up to 10%.

Mike Ogilvie, client services director at OBC The Accountants, says his clients would definitely see sizeable a pay cut in the year to come, as many were choosing to award their staff a 2% rise this year – well deserved after years of pay squeezes. He says: ‘GPs are being very careful on their costs [but] their income is also being squeezed so they will be anticipating probably a 10% or more reduction in take-home pay for next year.’

He adds that a lot of staff wages have been ‘kept down in past years’, but adds: ‘As with so many other people in business, there’s only so long you can keep staff without increasing pay.’

Keith Taylor, head of medical services at BW Medical Accountants, says that, after expenses, the funding uplift will only result in a pre-tax funding increase of £700 per partner, or 30p per patient – ‘hardly a significant increase’.

Partners feel they have no choice but to give staff pay rises – even though these will be at the expense of the partners themselves. Dr Joe McGilligan, a GP in Redhill, Surrey, and a former chair of NHS East Surrey CCG, says he expects to be out of pocket:  ‘As partners who value our staff, we pass on the uplift to them at our expense.’

Ipswich GP Dr Sally Whale says the partners at her practice will ‘probably take the hit to ensure our staff get the rise they deserve as we can’t do the job without them’.

The DDRB acknowledges that GPs have suffered pay decreases over the past few years, with only 2009/10 providing an increase – and that was only 0.4%.

April issue - Pay feaure box out

Its report, which recommended the 1% pay rise, but stopped short of proposing how this should be achieved, said GP earnings had fallen far short of the intended increase in each of the five years for which it had made a recommendation. In 2011/12, it had intended GPs to receive a 1.5% pay increase. However, the 1.4% recommended funding uplift actually led to a 1.5% decrease in take-home pay.

This latest award comes at a time when partners’ pensions contributions have increased, while a cut in pensions tax relief, announced in the Budget, will also hit them in the pocket.

Dr Nagpaul says that while the GPC has not yet formally worked out what the 1.16% funding uplift will mean, he is concerned about its implications for struggling practices. But he says practices can mitigate loss of earnings.

He pointed to the GPC’s guidance on managing workload from January this year, saying: ‘We have to cut our cloth according to what we are awarded. There are many things we don’t need to do; there are many expenses that we take on from work we don’t have to do. We do have choices about how we manage our expenses and our workload.’

But Dr Whale is unconvinced. She says: ‘We have already pared as much as we can without damaging the service beyond repair in terms for efficiencies.’

And she’s not alone. Nottinghamshire GP, Dr Tony Brownson, says costs involved with CQC inspection and locum cover are among the many rising expenses practices are having to shoulder.

He speaks for many GPs when he says: ‘I’m not sure why anyone would take a full-time job, let alone a partnership, when they could be earning more with no responsibility beyond the patient sitting in front of them.

‘Retirement is very attractive.’

 

Rate this article  (4 average user rating)

Click to rate

  • 1 star out of 5
  • 2 stars out of 5
  • 3 stars out of 5
  • 4 stars out of 5
  • 5 stars out of 5

0 out of 5 stars

Readers' comments (17)

  • Does anyone really think this has happened by accident any Doctor voting Tory needs a mental health assessment,why doesn't Pulse ask their tame MP Sarah Woollaston about her vision for the future?

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • cancel golf membership and sell the Bentley.

    for entertainment get a subscription to the Daily Mail and for transport get a Hyundai - it's what the punters want.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Time to start saying NO to the excessive work, let other parts of the NHS do it, if the govt doesn't want to pay us a fair deal.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • 9.22pm - don't knock the hyundai !!!! - I have 'upgraded' to a 6 year old hyundai this year . !! - great work this 'full time partner stuff '!!!!

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • This isn't just tinkering with numbers. Many GP partners, particularly those who are clinicians rather than wannabe empire-builders, have seen very real decreases in their annual drawings.

    I fully appreciate that we need to look after our own financial interests. But d'you know what? I could live with a pay squeeze were it not for two things. The first is the number of pointless hoops that we have to jump through to justify our existence and secure even that reduced income. And the other is the way the NHS as a whole appears to be disintegrating in front of our eyes while our political leaders live in a world that's completely detached from what we and our patients are experiencing.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • QOF just finshed -( almost maximal points this year after long hard work by partners and staff).............

    ***SO CAN SOMEONE TELL ME WHERE THE MONEY HAS GONE***.???!!??

    We were promised that reductions in points for QOF would be compensated by an equivalent increase in Global sum.
    We now calculate greater than £11,000 reducion in practice funding missing from the QOF - which has not appeared in global sum.

    Death by a thousand cuts ????!!!!

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • The governmment is playing with fire. This year's pay cut is likely to be the last straw.

    After the 9th year of paycuts you would have to be deluded to think it would be better next year.

    Why would you stay ?

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • All those, once again, condemning "the Tories" be careful what you wish for. The income has been in decline since the botch job "new Contract" in 2004 (under Labour) and continued until 2010 (under Labour) since then at least it has flattened out.

    Once again I say, you cannot vote the next government in based on the NHS alone, the NHS is being used as an election tool and you are all pandering to it.

    Look at the bigger picture because, if the truth is known, the NHS can only survive based on a successful economy which includes more workers paying tax. unfortunately, as has been proved over and over again, a Labour government usually means more unemployment, less tax income, therefore more tax rises for the workers.

    If a Labour Government come to power this year, by 2020, we will not be able to afford an NHS and we will be asking Greece to bail us out!!!!

    Be careful what you wish for!!

    Happy Easter everyone

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Independent businesses are able to balance the quality of their product, the value of their product, the costs of delivering or producing the product and then able to price the product themselves...

    In primary care as independent businesses we can certainly effect the quality of what we do but the rest is almost totally out of our control now. Don't get me wrong their are advantages to being independent but the benefit versus the risk balance has tipped over dramatically.
    If primary care really does see 92% of contacts each day, 1,000,000 contacts in the UK each day, deals with 1in 3 consutlations with an additional MH component, deliver social care from within the consultation room on top of the day job plus the rest... Where should the real transformation and investment be.... And remember it is not only about money... CCGs are at the heart of this if they are allowed to perform to the best of their ability..
    P:)

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Oh yes and
    HAPPY EASTER everyone
    P:)))

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

View results 10 results per page20 results per page

Have your say