Cookie policy notice

By continuing to use this site you agree to our cookies policy below:
Since 26 May 2011, the law now states that cookies on websites can ony be used with your specific consent. Cookies allow us to ensure that you enjoy the best browsing experience.

This site is intended for health professionals only

At the heart of general practice since 1960

GP locum notional pay cap set at £80 per hour, says GPC

NHS England has set its ‘indicative rate’ for locums at £80 per hour, as it presses ahead with plans to force practices to report every time they pay over this rate, the GPC has learned.

The chair of GPC’s sessional GP committee, Dr Zoe Norris, said that practices will be asked to submit a mandatory report on how much they have paid locums over the months of July, August and September 2016 ‘in the coming weeks’.

The mandatory report will ask ‘how many times in this period did you pay more than the indicative rate per hour to a locum?’.

Filling it out is compulsory for practices, having been written into the GP contract against the GPC’s wishes earlier this year.

The new national indicative rate of £80.01 has been calculated by NHS England based on the ‘average salaried GP pay range’ though the precise workings are unclear.

NHS England intends to use this information to map out areas of high locum demand, or areas where locums are particularly needed.

Dr Norris said: ‘The next few weeks will see practices being asked to submit data on how much they have paid locums.’

She said that this is part of practice’s ‘mandatory e-reporting’ so practices are contractually obliged to complete it, but stressed that ’it should have no impact on what rate is agreed between locums and practices.T

She said: ’This is not a cap. It is a data collection exercise. It’s important we are clear about that.’

In a blog on the BMA website, she added: ’You’ll forgive my cynicism about what happens next, and how this information gives us any more detailed information compared to what we already have. Needless to say, we will be at the table with NHSE looking at these figures and results.

’We will be reminding them what a significant part of the workforce sessional doctors are, and that in the current precarious position of the NHS, they would do well to remember this.’

The GMS contract for 2016/17 introduced the requirement to ‘record annually the number of instances where a practice pays a locum doctor more than an indicative maximum rate, as set out by NHS England.’

But GPC chair Dr Chaand Nagpaul told Pulse at the time that the clause had been ‘imposed unilaterally’ by NHS England and stressed there is no requirement for practices to set rates at the cap.

And at the Pulse Live conference in London this year Dr Nagpaul urged practices not to take any notice of the ‘indicative rate’, saying we need to ‘just challenge it head-on, and not be affected by anything that is not contractual.’

Pulse has asked NHS England for a comment.

Readers' comments (98)

  • What does the Competition and Markets Authority have to say about capping rates unilaterally? What rights do NHSE have to impose an indicative rate if it is only after information on where locums are needed. The practices are the ones paying so unless NHSE are planning to pay the backfill is it really any of their business?

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • And what if anything can they do about rates above this?

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • This open market economy will cripple NHS because of locum GPs and hospital doctors greed. Freshly qualified GPs with little experience are asking for ridiculous rates which range from £85 to £105 per hour + pensions + indemnity. These rates and many salaried rates being asked are unsustainable. A large number of newly qualified GPs go down locum or sessional GP routes and one such GP boasted that he makes £150K by being part-time locum. Both the profession and NHS needs to control this unrestricted rise in GP costs. This can be done by capping NHS pensions contributions to a maximum rate such as £80/hour and restricting locum work for newly qualified GPs to a maximum of 3 months per year. Locums are necessary for essential holidays or sick cover but the long term locums do not bring any continuity of care, improvement or innovation to health care.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • I increased my hourly rate to £80 last month. I will have to increase it further in subsequent years to cover the rapidly rising cost of medical indemnity and inflation.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Restricting newly qualified GP's to little/no locum work is depriving them of some valuable experience. All will be used to nice training practices, and it can be a major eye opener. It'll also reduce the locum pool, not a good idea

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • After indemnity, pension deduction, costs in sometimes travelling long distances to a practice etc I know plumbers, tree fellers and roofers who earn much more per hour.

    I have work booked for next 2 months and if practices don't intend to honour my rate or reduce my rate to £80/ hour I will tell them cancel the booking then. Plenty of work for me above that rate which agencies have guaranteed even after this "cap". Supply and demand.

    Please remember if a locum takes 2 weeks holiday or goes of sick unlike salaried GPs and partners their pay is £0 per hour. We factor this into our rates.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • I response to practice manager whom labelled locum GP as greedy . Do you not take any better pay? Do you think you are in the position to judge newly qualified GP ?? Do you not know that they are many newly qualified GPs whom worked in other fields eg A&E for yrs ?? Your comment is an insult ! Btw, you don't have hire locum GP if the surgery you are working has enough GP.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment


    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • You cannot fix the market.The powers that be have to increase the supply of GPs to push down the price otherwise __THIS WILL NOT WORK!

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • If the position of being a partner was made more attractive this problem would not arise .

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

View results 10 results per page20 results per page50 results per page

Have your say

IMPORTANT: On Wednesday 7 December 2016, we implemented a new log in system, and if you have not updated your details you may experience difficulties logging in. Update your details here. Only GMC-registered doctors are able to comment on this site.