Cookie policy notice

By continuing to use this site you agree to our cookies policy below:
Since 26 May 2011, the law now states that cookies on websites can ony be used with your specific consent. Cookies allow us to ensure that you enjoy the best browsing experience.

This site is intended for health professionals only

At the heart of general practice since 1960

Dr David Bailey: 'There will be more sickness absence and higher attrition rates'

Dr David Bailey gives his reaction to the findings of a review that backs a hike in the retirement age for GPs.

It’s not unreasonable to suggest that people in the workplace over 60 can generally perform as well as their younger counterparts. But without greater flexibility on hours and part-time working GPs will find it very difficult to cope with the increased workload year on year when the retirement age goes up.

The problems with the increasing intensity of GPs’ jobs are partly down to government policy. If you don’t allow more flexibility on hours or greater recognition of the hard work there is going to be more sickness absence among GPs, higher attrition rates and more retiring early.

It’s difficult to argue against the idea that in the UK we need to work longer.  But there will be problems for the Government in raising the retirement age for GPs if it is also introducing policies at the same time to make GPs work harder and jump through more hoops. The changes to the contract – such as altering the QOF thresholds – are an example of this.

The Government continually seem to be giving the impression that GPs are working less and less hard. And some denizens of the media take the same view. The Government wants to raise the retirement age, but at the same time it is expecting GPs to do more.

Dr David Bailey is deputy chair of the BMA’s pension subcommittee

Readers' comments (4)

  • Dr Bailey had summed it up very nicely.
    I certainly wil not be encouraging youngster to enter primary care.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • work until I drop....no thanks !!

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • It is very simple do more and more and more, for longer and longer and longer, for less when you are working and less if you survive to retirement. Could the government be more obvious in their desire to break general practice and with it the NHS? Does anyone see the NHS surviving two more parliaments?

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • It's not just doctors its all health workers and its also harder to get ill health retirement than it ever was before. I speak from experience They will end up with an ageing and decrepit workforce in a poorer state of health than our patients who have the benefit of all of the healthy living opportunities and drugs we now have!!!

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Have your say