Cookie policy notice

By continuing to use this site you agree to our cookies policy below:
Since 26 May 2011, the law now states that cookies on websites can ony be used with your specific consent. Cookies allow us to ensure that you enjoy the best browsing experience.

This site is intended for health professionals only

At the heart of general practice since 1960

Majority of full-time GPs to be hit with pension tax bills of up to £60,000

GPs face higher tax bills on their pensions after chancellor George Osborne announced in yesterday’s Budget that the lifetime allowance for tax-free pension savings was to be reduced from £1.25m to £1m.

The BMA warned lowering the cap on tax-free savings further would now put most full-time GPs in line for a hefty tax bill when they retire and mean they may be better off stopping contributions before they reach their original planned retirement age.

It comes after Pulse revealed many more GPs are already contemplating opting out of the NHS scheme because of changes meaning they have to work longer, until 67 or 68, or lose certain benefits.

The chancellor’s announcement was made as one of a range of measures to ensure ‘fairness’ in how society contributes to cutting the deficit.

The Budget documents state that the Government is ‘restricting the lifetime allowance for pensions tax relief to £1 million from April 2016 and indexing it by inflation from 2018 so that everyone contributes their fair share to reducing the deficit’.

According to accountants, the reduction in the lifetime allowance means the maximum tax-free lump sum GPs can take on retirement will go down from £163,043 to £130,435, and the maximum they will be able draw tax-free is going to fall from £54,348 to £43,478.

At the top end of the scale, a GP with a £1.5m pension pot could end up paying around £60,000 in tax over 20 years, or £3,000 a year.

Dr David Bailey, deputy chair of the BMA pensions committee, told Pulse the change was ‘going to bring in the vast majority of retiring GPs. It has a double significance for GPs because we pay the employers’ contributions as well as employee’.

He added: ‘People will be thinking seriously about whether they need to take fixed protection to maintain their lifetime allowance at the higher level before the new one comes in in 2016.’

Luke Bennett, partner at Francis Clark LLP, told Pulse GPs with pensions already worth more than £1m might be protected from the change and that the plan to increase the allowance with inflation from 2018 was ‘helpful’, but he agreed GPs reaching retirement would be likely to decide to leave the NHS scheme – leading to a rise in contributions.

Mr Bennett said: ‘Although the details haven’t yet been announced, I expect that it will give some relief for those GPs who have pension funds (NHS plus any private) worth more than £1m on 5 April 2016.

‘In my view the reduction in lifetime allowance is going to lead to more GPs deciding to stop paying into the NHS pension scheme prior to retirement, as they will be reluctant to build up pension benefits in excess of the lifetime allowance.’

He added: ‘If high earners stop paying in, and take their benefits early, the contributions needed from those remaining in the scheme will have to increase to cover the shortfall.’

Paul Samrah, a medical accountant with Kingston Smith, said GPs should check the value of their schemes.

He said: ‘It’s going to bring a lot more GPs into the “net” – they need to be very much aware of it, not just assume that they’re immune from it and that this only applies to private pensions. They should be checking the value of their scheme.’

Readers' comments (22)

  • The politicians have awarded themselves an 11% pay rise and protect their banker friends ( look at who Osborne was at school with ) with bailouts . The money comes from somewhere and they have stolen it from us . No matter how it is dressed up this is thievery . How blatant can you get . No OOH work for 2 months will be the first shot .

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • How can it be fair to steal money that was earned before the banker induced crash ?

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Recruit and retain, how are you going to do that.One of the only benefits of training for and doing this ball breaking job was the pension,It looks like now that is off the table.No wonder we are all retiring or emigrating if we can.Anyone want to bet what success rate the next round of recruiting will have.Odd on it will be poorer than the last one.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • The aim is to drive out people and liquidate the NHSP Scheme. Politicians can't digest the idea of NHS staff having a scheme which probably could give them a deserved rest in old age. Why stop battering them till retirement - why not to their graves? And hence the constant changes to the Scheme to drive people out.
    I bet they already have a contingency plan and reserves to pay pensions to those getting them at present even if all GPs leave the scheme within the next 5 years. And then Georgie will give us a new lolly to suck before the elections - that is , if he hasn't availed of his pension or joined an American healthcare corpo.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • It wont just be GPs opting out of the pension scheme it will be GPs opting out of GPing.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • The budget also dropped the tax threshold of yearly pension pot rise from £50K to £40K which will encourage early retirements.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Dear Young GPs, Poor your money into ISAs and the new help to buy ISA for your kids, buy the biggest house you can and keep extending it as its tax free lump sum when you down size.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Isn't this an own goal as far as GPs are concerned? I can see the exodus of GPs in their late 50s becoming a stampede

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Buy gold

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Are they ever going to stop kicking us?

    I've seen 53 highly demanding patients today, admitted 5 patients, made numerous "life changing" interventions and I'm knackered.

    No way will I make it alive to 67 to see my devalued rubbishy pension. I'm 43.....

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

View results 10 results per page20 results per page50 results per page

Have your say