Cookie policy notice

By continuing to use this site you agree to our cookies policy below:
Since 26 May 2011, the law now states that cookies on websites can ony be used with your specific consent. Cookies allow us to ensure that you enjoy the best browsing experience.

This site is intended for health professionals only

At the heart of general practice since 1960

BMA suggests GPs should receive a 2% pay rise next year

Doctor leaders have suggested GPs should have at least a 2% pay uplift in 2017/18, to be in line with the ‘wider economy’.

In its submission to the Review Body on Doctors’ and Dentists’ Remuneration (DDRB), the the BMA argued that ‘doctors should be treated in line with the wider economy, where pay settlements continue to run at higher than the public sector pay policy cap, at around 2% currently’.

This comes despite the Government telling the DDRB to keep within its sustained 1% cap on public sector pay rises.

The BMA said it was ‘disappointed’ when the DDRB only recommended an uplift ‘in line with the public sector pay policy’ for 2016/17, which it said was ‘lending credence to the impression that DDRB is no longer acting independently’.

The BMA said: ‘We believe that DDRB should make its recommendations based on the value of doctors, not within any constraints imposed by governments.’

According to the BMA, ‘doctors are being unfairly punished by government with continuing real loss of earnings and increasing cost pressures, when pay rises above 1% are still regularly being seen across the economy’.

It said this comes ‘at a time when doctors are working harder than ever to deliver a safe and quality service to patients, often at the expense of their own health’.

Backing up its argument, it highlighted that the NHS ‘is facing a significant recruitment and retention crisis across the UK’, warning that this ‘will only be worsened by a low or zero pay increase’.

The BMA went on to reject the Department of Health’s request for the DDRB to make specific recommendations with regards to recruiting, retaining and motivating the growing cohort of salaried GPs.

The submission said: ‘We believe there is a significant lack of data currently available around sessional GPs (salaried and locum) on which to base any firm recommendations, for example around pay ranges, and how GPs choose to take a partnership, salaried or locums post.’

This followed NHS England’s argument last year that boosting GP practice funding would worsen salaried GP recruitment, because partners would not pass on the uplift.

The BMA also said it thinks there is ‘currently insufficient data for DDRB to make recommendations around staff working under new models of care, or as sessional GPs’, with the BMA instead ‘again seeking a fair and common recommendation across all doctors, whoever and wherever they are’.

On the long-running problem of estimating GP practice expenses, the BMA said it has set up a working group with NHS Employers and NHS England ‘to identify any possible data sources, perhaps including practice accounts’.

GPs in England received a 3.2% total funding uplift for the current financial year, of which 1% was calculated to the be pay uplift and 2.2% reimbursement to meet rising expenses facing practices including CQC fees and indemnity cover.

How much do GPs earn?

According to official Government statistics, GP partner earnings increased by nearly 2% in the last year for which statistics were available (2014/15), to £101,500, although this figure includes all GP income, not just take home pay for NHS work.

For the same time period, the income of salaried GPs decreased by almost 2% to £53,600, NHS Digital data suggested.

At the time, GP leaders said increase in partner earnings reflected the decrease in GP numbers, meaning that the partners left are having to do more work for the same pay.

The GPC also said determining GP partner earnings was ‘hugely complex’, and that any increase that followed ‘a decade of falling GP contractor income’ would ‘not even get close to offsetting the massive increase in workload and stress that partners are facing’.

Readers' comments (21)

  • Mr Mephisto

    Crack open the champagne the good times are back!

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Typical out of touch BMA - they suggest a pay cut of 1.5% . Inflation will be 3.5% next year and 4 % the year after according to the most optimistic economic pundits . Even the BoE expects 2.7% next year . So the best we can hope for is 0.7% pay cut .

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Is that after taking into considerations such as increases in rents, CQC fees, etc.?

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • A 2% rise might be reasonable if workload were stable and unchanging, but this doesn't come close to compensating for the dramatic rise in workload year on year. GP remuneration MUST be adjusted to take consultation rates into account, and these have risen by 50% over 10 years while funding has been cut in real terms

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • THE GOVERNMENT ARE DESPERATELY TRYING TO "CONTROL MARKET FORCES" BUT ULTIMATELY THIS IS FUTILE.
    EITHER PEOPLE GET PAID THEIR "MARKET WORTH" OR THEY WILL NOT BE ABLE TO RUN THE NHS ANY LONGER BECAUSE OF RECRUITMENT AND RETENTION PROBLEMS

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • 3.2% uplift translated to 2p per patient per month; 2%=??
    You don't have to be an Einstein to guess that this will not cover the increase in CQC to £3000 for small Practices from next year. The CQC consultation or 'listening exercise' is there only to tweak the tragus and blow some wind through the eustachians without access to the neurons.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • STRIKE!

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • "Our Leaders" are so out of touch. What would the RMT demand for their members? We need a 20% pay rise just to cancel out the pay cuts over the past 5 years.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • This ties in nicely with medical students perception of general practice . Would you respect a profession that accepts a 0.7% pay cut and puts up with increasing workload but is vilified by press and public alike ?
    Thought not. so why should they?

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • We will get a 1% rise if we're lucky. The government doesn't want general practice . That is clear .

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

View results 10 results per page20 results per page50 results per page

Have your say

IMPORTANT: On Wednesday 7 December 2016, we implemented a new log in system, and if you have not updated your details you may experience difficulties logging in. Update your details here. Only GMC-registered doctors are able to comment on this site.