Cookie policy notice

By continuing to use this site you agree to our cookies policy below:
Since 26 May 2011, the law now states that cookies on websites can ony be used with your specific consent. Cookies allow us to ensure that you enjoy the best browsing experience.

This site is intended for health professionals only

At the heart of general practice since 1960

GPC to draw up report on potential co-payments to support general practice

The GPC will draw up a report on potential alternative funding options, including the use of co-payments, that could avert a potential collapse of UK general practice.

GP leaders at the LMCs Conference 2017 in Edinburgh today tasked the GPC with putting together a list of the charging options available and their potential pros and cons.

The decision went against guidance from the GPC’s lead on the issue, GPC Scotland chair Dr Alan McDevitt, who warned that passing the motion would send the wrong message.

But speaking in favour, Dr Richard Wood of Buckinghamshire LMC said that simply drawing up a list of options did not mean they had to be taken, and that it was important for the profession to have visibility of all available options.

He told delegates: ‘We have heard this morning about the devastating, shameful picture in Northern Ireland. They’re at their TINA moment: There. Is. No. Alternative. If we are to avoid our own TINA moment we need to know our own plan A, B, C, D, and Z.

‘So what are our options? I’m not asking us to choose privatisation. I’m not asking us to choose to charge the vulnerable in society. I’m asking to educate ourselves, to put us in the best possible position. We don’t have to choose the options, but we do need to know they’re there.’

In response Dr McDevitt said: ‘The key issue here is including co-payments, That will be the headline tomorrow, that’s what we’ll be talking about forever.

‘So if that’s the message you want to send, that’s what you do.' 

The motion in full: 

AGENDA COMMITTEE That conference instructs the GPC to produce a discussion paper outlining alternative funding options for general practice, including co-payments.

 

Readers' comments (5)

  • Why is the GPC so obsessed with a free at the point of use NHS when it is collapsing, lets face it care in the UK is now dangerous. I worked in Australia co payments work well, patients don't time waste and doctors don't pontificate

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • 4:40 - agreed.
    And please let's not get distracted by the debate about how much net money would be raised. It may indeed cost more to administrate than is raised. That's not the point. The point is to establish permanently and constantly in people's minds that healthcare is not a God-given right - despite that we might like it to be. It costs money. Like everything else. Sad to say, God's not paying our taxes.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • It has to be done.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • no harm in looking at options. Time to stop worrying about headlines

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Food and water are a more pressing need than healthcare yet government doesn't have to centrally control food. This is good.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Have your say

IMPORTANT: On Wednesday 7 December 2016, we implemented a new log in system, and if you have not updated your details you may experience difficulties logging in. Update your details here. Only GMC-registered doctors are able to comment on this site.