This site is intended for health professionals only

At the heart of general practice since 1960

GPs to move ‘as close to salaried as possible’ under radical plan to reduce workload in Scotland

Exclusive GPs will give up employing practice staff and potentially have contractual limits set on their workload under proposals being looked at by Scottish ministers.

The proposals will see GPs share responsibility for care with a wider ‘primary care team’, in a move that will see the profession move ‘as far towards salaried model as possible without losing independent status’ by 2017.

Under the plans – currently being developed by Scottish GPC and discussed with ministers – GPs will be contracted as independent ‘expert generalist medical advisors’, potentially with limits placed on their workload and their gatekeeper role shared among other professionals.

GPs will only be responsible for the direct care they provide under the plans and would no longer employ practice staff, with practice pharmacists and nursing teams directly employed by health and social care boards to carry out health checks, QOF work and prescribing.

The plans will be officially presented to GP leaders at the LMCs Conference in London later this week and they have already received backing from the Scottish health minister Shona Robison.

She told delegates at Pulse Live in Edinburgh today the ideas were ‘compelling’.

GPs in Scotland have a three-year pause in contract changes until 2017 in order to agree a completely new GP contract

Speaking at Pulse Live, Scottish GPC chair Dr Alan McDevitt said the current independent contractor status model was too risky and putting off potential new GPs. He said the new proposals could ‘engender hope’ and ‘encourage more GPs into the profession’.

Dr McDevitt explained: ‘We are arguing for a physican-led primary healthcare team – it doesn’t mean you’re the boss because you don’t employ the team but you should be leading how to achieve the outcomes, providing expert medical support to those team members.’

He said the contract with the local health organisation would ‘still be based on practices and practice lists’ as this allowed ‘the personal, relationship-based care fundamental to the future – that’s how we manage risks in the community, that’s how we have joint, shared decision making with patients’.

But he said this would mean ‘the community gets a share of the GPs’ time’ and that GPs will only have responsibility for the care they directly provide.

He warned that if negotiators failed to secure a more attractive independent contract for GPs they would end up with a fully salaried model, but that the aim was to ‘try to keep the best of the independent contractor status at the same time as getting rid of the worst of it’.

Ms Robison said the new GP contract from 2017 was a ‘big opportunity’ to change general practice.

She said: ‘We have had this discussion… about moving away from the kind of gatekeeper role of general practice to a model of primary care being a wider health team, with GPs being the clinical experts.

‘That’s something that I know the BMA and the RCGP have said is a more sustainable model.’

She added: ‘But the GP would provides the clinical expert advice to that primary care team - that is quite a different model to what we have at the moment - but the RCGP and the BMA are saying this is a good model to work towards.’

 

 

 

 

Related images

  • Dr-McDevitt-Alan
pulse gp survey nov2018 180x250px v1

Readers' comments (37)

  • Complaining and sniveling either deserves no response (i.e. if you
    don’t want to eat Mexican food, don’t come, you won’t be missed)
    or a strong response, designating them what they are: malingerers
    seeking compensation for no value delivered. Or, in even plainer
    English, thieves.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • The current model of GPs in practices employing their own staff works well and provides cost effective health care -why change it. Unfortunately, the same cannot be said for services run by the health board where there are frequent reorganizations, poor staff morale, high levels of staff sickness and frequent staff change over. Do we really need this in General Practice?

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Partners don't want an All-Salaried model.
    Partners don't want an All-Partnership model.

    So what else do the Partners want other than more money?

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • If I had been offered the consultant contract to embrace salaried status in 2004 I would have embraced it wholeheartedly. (My wife is a consultant so I read both), this despite taking a pay cut. The 2004 contract was a disaster. I am 51 and senior partner, life is entirely miserable and the promised pension based on hard work has gone. My children will not be doing medicine. My advice to them is to work Monday to Friday with weekends off to enjoy life. God knows they will be working long enough. Seven day working is the final nail in the coffin.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • I'm all for a salaried model (and I now work as a GP in Scotland)
    This will ensure our indemnity costs stay low (already significant lower compared to England), will to some extent stop the exploitation of salaried workforce by partners ( I can give numerous examples - one being partners who have every weekend as a 'long' weekend forcing salaried staff to do every Monday and Friday as duty docs). There will also be none of this nonsnse where GP partners wait to retire up until their son/daughter/nephew comes along to be parachuted into a partnership... There was some mention of potential bureaucracy under the all salaried model...well the bureaucracy is already incredibly overwhelming in England with CQC, CCG and other 3 letter abbreviations in a partnership model!!...also, I certainly would not like to be responsible for the sick pay of receptionists, admin staff, nurses etc,if I were to be a partner in the future ...bring on the salaried model

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • What of dispensing practices, premises costs , managers and the whole business . GP practice is not just the staff they are businesses . Switch to this system and you will need to replace many GPs who walk away . Much more detail is required and the choice of walking away the Nhs have a legal contract with GPs .

    This will be the death of Nhs Scotland !

    May be I will take up a telephony post from home for 150k per annum

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • One of Bevan's concessions to Doctors in forming the NHS was the independent contractual stasis for GP's.It has kept General Practice under the control of Doctors and close to communities ever since .We work in small groups employing our staff in family like businesses with costs for buildings etc kept down because we get to take more money home if we are efficient.One or two computer geeks started to use computers 20 years ago and pushed the rest of us screaming towards computerised records . We learned to type and British General Practice created one of the most comprehensive medical data sets in the world and it all happened by osmosis.We together created the RCGP , the exam and the specialisation of General practice .
    There is a plan in Scotland for Health Boards to take over the employment of our staff, that we will be as close to salaried as possible. That we will become consultants in primary care and that much of the routine work we are doing will be done by other Health care professionals.Firstly the plan is not specific about any one idea in it .What is the routine work of a GP ? Where are all these allied health professionals? It is quicker to see me than a physiotherapist( often you just get a handout), a psychiatric nurse, a psychologist,a councillor. Working in clusters? I could make a guess that this is about spreading the work force to where it is needed, but again an idea short on detail.
    My practice would probably want to preserve the status quo. I am well aware that in parts of busy urban Scotland and our more isolated areas that anything would be better than the status quo. When we were saddled with out of hours many urban practices had created co-ops which had solved the problem and I remember my frustration listening to people who had no idea what our lives were like in semi-rural Scotland .
    The status quo is not an option, but next time people are romanticising about the days of matron and the consultant as the team leaders in secondary care, think about what is going to happen to General Practice. Clusters will grow and become massive as they already are in England , at first perhaps run by doctors , but that will rapidly become impossible. Then it will be big business and we will be employees , grocers to Tesco's.Everything will be neatly packed but never quite taste the same again.We will be audited and told who to review , who can be seen by someone else, how many to see in what time. We will belong to nothing and the personnel relationships which are the magic of our therapeutic power will be lost.Patients will loose their Doctor who has overall responsibility for their care , who advocates for them when the system lets them down. Prescribing is dangerous enough with the confusion between primary and secondary care , what will it be like adding in allied health professionals with an innocent script for ibuprofen.
    The Road shows have been stages for politicians, not exchanges of ideas. I would suggest we go in the opposite direction and use the model of the independent contractual stasis as the solution to the problem. Give practices the resources to employ the staff they need, their own physiotherapist, pharmacist, psychiatric nurse , district nurse .Create bigger teams from the successful teams that already exist.We need to remember how successful the NHS is at the present moment, it looks after 70 million people in one of the most socially divided countries in Europe and in light of that gets world class results .Is their anybody else out there who smells a rat!

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

View results 10 results per page20 results per page50 results per page

Have your say