Cookie policy notice

By continuing to use this site you agree to our cookies policy below:
Since 26 May 2011, the law now states that cookies on websites can ony be used with your specific consent. Cookies allow us to ensure that you enjoy the best browsing experience.

This site is intended for health professionals only

At the heart of general practice since 1960

GMC to commission independent review of revalidation

The GMC is to commission an independent review of revalidation to ‘refine the system’ once every doctor has been through it, its chief executive has told Pulse.

In a letter to Pulse, Professor Niall Dickson said that interim results from the evaluation should be available in January 2016 whereupon the GMC would be ‘in a better position to assess the impact of the first wave of revalidation and how it can be improved and developed’.

GP leaders welcomed the review, but said that revalidation continues to be a form of ‘regulatory overkill’.

Professor Dickson was responding to a Pulse story that revealed that only a handful of GPs had been put through remediation following revalidation, raising questions about the utility of the whole scheme.

He said that revalidation was a ‘process’ and not a case of doctors passing or failing.

He wrote: ‘It remains our ambition to work with the profession, employers and patient groups to refine the system once every doctor has been through it.

‘We have commissioned an independent evaluation and after interim results in January 2016, we should all be in a better position to assess the impact of the first wave of revalidation and how it can be improved and developed. ‘

The GPC welcomed the review.

Dr Dean Marshall, the GPC’s lead negotiator for revalidation issues, said: ’While it is sensible to review revalidation, now that we are a couple of years in, it depends on the criteria of the review and whether it includes appraisal which is the issue here.

‘While the GPC supports revalidation GPs have to jump through a lot of hoops for appraisal and the question is whether revalidation is a good use of everyone’s time.’

Dr Marshall also said that that the GPC would be looking closely at how ‘independent’ the review of revalidation actually was.

Meanwhile, Dr Peter Holden, a former GPC negotiator and GP in Matlock, Derbyshire, told Pulse that he hopes that the results of a review of revalidation will be ‘proof’ of what GP have been saying all along – that it is ‘regulatory overkill’.

He claimed that revalidation is one of the many reasons that GPs are leaving the profession.

‘I had a partner who left the profession six years ago aged 53, saying they were not going through the nonsense of revalidation. We are being crushed by regulatory burdens. I resent spending two weekends to get my appraisal completed – this is time that is taking us away from patient care.’

Revalidation was introduced in 2012 in the wake of a series of health scandals. But critics claim that the appraisal system has gone too far, increasing GPs’ workloads and regulatory burdens when the great majority of GPs do not need remediation.

GPs had previously complained that there was mounting evidence that the revalidation process was becoming a bureaucratic nightmare for some GPs.

The GMC promised that the whole process would take only a day to complete, but GP leaders have complained about 70-hour marathons to collect evidence.

Readers' comments (19)

  • Vinci Ho

    It is a fine line between politically correct diplomacy and a dangerously flawed hypocrisy ......

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • This comment has been removed by the moderator

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Why don't the GMC just take a huge running jump and leave us alone to do our jobs. I hate this organisation.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • - what is the purpose of revalidation ?
    - are the goals of revalidation valid?
    - does revalidation achieve it's stated goals?
    - is the process fair, balanced and accessible to all without discrimination or bias?
    - is revalidation a fair use of doctor's time given that our time is limited?
    - compared to other professions - is revalidation excessive, about right, or not enough?

    so many questions ... i doubt wewill get any answers as the politics of the NHS makes FIFA look democratic.

    you can also replace revalidation with 'GMC'.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • The worst thing about revalidation and annual appraisals is that Dr Shipman would have passed them hands down and laughed back as they are not fit for purpose! Please God, give the Government and GMC some common sence and free clinicians from beaurocracy if you want to have any GPs left in NHS! Dr Nuke

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Pointless exercise. They want to be seen doing something. Use registration fees to pay some review body. Deja vu.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Over regulation is driving doctors out of the country and into retirement.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • This is a positive move actually as long as a fully independent and factual inquiry. May be more revealing that we expect, and if the GMC is becoming more transparent that can only be good thing.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Lets hope the GMC hasnt caught the same transparent ethos that FIFA seems to have or are they moving towards the efficiency of Mr Blatters organisation.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Independent ? hmmm I don't think the GMC knows the meaning of the word.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

View results 10 results per page20 results per page

Have your say

IMPORTANT: On Wednesday 7 December 2016, we implemented a new log in system, and if you have not updated your details you may experience difficulties logging in. Update your details here. Only GMC-registered doctors are able to comment on this site.