This site is intended for health professionals only

At the heart of general practice since 1960

GMC to train fitness-to-practise investigators to recognise 'human factors'

The GMC is intending to train all staff involved in fitness-to-practise decisions and investigation to recognise the role of 'human factors'.

The regulator said this would 'give doctors assurance' that their actions would be judged against the 'backdrop' of 'any system failings' going forward.

Following the high-profile Bawa-Garba case, the GMC has been criticised for failing to consider wider system failings when investigating doctor errors.

But the GMC said fitness-to-practise decision makers, case examiners and clinical experts will all now receive 'human factors' training - a tool widely used tool within industries including aviation, nuclear power and the military.

It said in future, responsible officers would be trained so that 'the same approaches are also consistently applied locally', 'before' issues are referred to the GMC.

The GMC said it will also draw on human factors experts to better understand system failures when investigating doctors going forward.

GMC chief executive Charlie Massey said the new approach would ensure 'the role systems and workplaces play in events is fully and evently evaluated in assessing context following serious failings'.

He said: 'That will guarantee consistency in how we investigate after things have gone wrong and give doctors the assurance that their actions will be seen clearly against the backdrop of any system failings.'

He added that it would also 'help to embed a greater understanding across the health system of how environments contribute to patient safety incidents'.

The GMC will work in collaboration with the University of Oxford's Patient Safety Academy, a department funded by Health Education England, for both the training and ongoing expert advice.

Project leader Professor Peter McCulloch, a professor of surgical science and practice, said integrating human factors into the fitness-to-practice process would involve both staff training and 'modification of procedures and documentation', to 'ensure that the knowledge acquired is embedded into the investigative process'.

He said: 'Our aim in this work is to ensure that context and systems issues are always fully taken into account when evaluating a doctor’s performance, allowing doctors to have confidence in the fairness of GMC procedures.

‘We believe that patient safety will be improved by a just culture for healthcare workers, and that this collaboration represents an important advance.’

The news comes as a BMA survey of 8,000 doctors found over half fear they will be blamed for making a medical error made because of systemic pressures in the NHS.

Medical Defence Union head of advisory services Dr Caroline Fryar said: 'We are glad that the GMC is recognising and taking into account the fact that doctors are often put in a position where they are unable to control their environment and circumstances but must carry on and treat patients as best as they can.'

Earlier this year, the GMC successfully struck off Dr Hadiza Bawa-Garba in the High Court, overturning a decision from its own tribunal service, which found her fit to practise.

However, the medical profession reacted angrily to the decision, pointing out that there were a series of systematic failures that led to the death of six-year-old Jack Adcock in 2011.

In August, the Court of Appeal ruled that the GMC should reinstate Dr Bawa-Garba to the medical register.

Since the case made the headlines at the beginning of the year, a GMC review into gross negligence manslaughter charges against doctors has looked at why there are fewer cases involving healthcare organisations compared with individuals.

What does the 'human factors' approach entail?

Human Factors is a social science which examines the relationships between individuals, their interactions with others and how their working environment impacts on the way they behave and make decisions.

It’s used in a number of ways – proactively in order to identify and mitigate risks and so reduce medical errors, and after events to look at the reasons why decisions were taken and how the context in which someone was working may have affected the choices made and the results for doctors and patients.

'The training that the Patient Safety Academy will deliver for the GMC will allow our staff to better understand interaction between humans tasks, technology and environment so that – when looking at whether a doctor’s fitness to practise is called into question – all of the context around their actions will be taken into account,' a GMC spokesperson said.

Source: GMC

Readers' comments (19)

  • GMC, our eternal thanks for recognising issues that have been part of the bedrock of justice for centuries. Your kindness in joining the 19th century makes me well up with tears. I, on behalf of all medics, offer you an apology. We all just didn't understand you were ignorant and more aware of your political masters. I could write more but the nurses here don't believe I am a Zblong from the planet Eurghhhh.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • It would give me more confidence if they used the term "External Factors" or "Contextual Factors" but I suppose from a very low base this has to be recognised as a belated step in the right direction.

    Why they have to be dragged into behaving properly is beyond me.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • "Going forward" mentioned many times in the article should read- GOING BACKWARDS. Sadly GMC has no track record of "going forward" it is a repressive, punative, self centred, self serving narcissist organisation

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Vinci Ho

    Jaimie , I think Pulse has now got enough material to publish a book about GMC . I can see that to be a potential bestseller.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Hang on a minute, they are proposing training staff to recognise what it means to be human? Are they trying to tell us that they are in fact manned by robots?

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • This is pure hubris and decay. A disgrace that it’s even being implemented

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • We’re already judged against a ‘backdrop’. The latter being the wall of the execution yard.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Doctor McDoctor Face

    I pay for various insurances. I expect them to give ME a good service or I stop paying them. I pay for various utilities. I expect them to give ME a good service or I stop paying them. etc etc

    Why am I paying for the GMC who provide GPs (ME) an appaulling service???

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • From all that has been said by the GMC in this article and if all fitness to practice investigators need training, then is right to conclude the investigators had no training or inadequate training. Hence all previous GMC investigations and MPTS verdicts rendered null and void, and should be open to legal challenge. The fruit of the poisonous tree ..., if the investigator and other MPTS are found to be have inadequate training to perform their roles , then their judgements and decisions are likely to have also been inadequate!

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • GMC: Serving themselves, Protecting Governments

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

View results 10 results per page20 results per page

Have your say