Cookie policy notice

By continuing to use this site you agree to our cookies policy below:
Since 26 May 2011, the law now states that cookies on websites can ony be used with your specific consent. Cookies allow us to ensure that you enjoy the best browsing experience.

This site is intended for health professionals only

At the heart of general practice since 1960

GP practices could face a breach of contract probe when given CQC 'requires improvement' rating

Exclusive GP practices could face being automatically assessed for a breach of contract when they are rated 'requires improvement' by the CQC, Pulse has learned.

As it stands, national guidance says practices rated 'inadequate' should receive a breach notice. But in London, NHS England's regional team is planning to also assess 'requires improvement'-rated practices for breach of contract.

It argued that this was necessary due to the higher-than-average number of practices receiving a 'requires improvement' rating in the capital. This would apply both to practices receiving the rating in future, and those that have received it to date.

Under the plans, contract holders are advised to read CQC reports and told they can automatically give a breach notice if it shows the contract has been breached, without a need to visit the practice - however NHS England said it would always advise gathering supporting evidence where possible.

Handing a breach of contract notice to a practice gives NHS England's local team and CCGs, where these are the commissioner of GP services, the remit to get involved in the issues identified.

Londonwide LMCs, which are being consulted on the proposal along with CCGs, told Pulse that it was resisting the move on the basis that a practice could end up having to deal with three different bodies simultaneiously over the same issue.

The plan, sent to all CCGs in the London area, said: 'Technically, when a practice is in receipt of a CQC report indicating that they require improvement, they have immediately breached their contract.

‘It follows that NHS England may be justified in issuing a breach and remedial notice without conducting a practice visit where a CQC report identifies and evidences matters which are contract breaches.'

In a letter accompanying the draft plan, NHS England (London) told CCGs this guidance would also apply retroactively, with practices having received a 'requires improvement' rating to date to also be investigated.

Head of primary care Jill Webb said all practices that have had 12 months to remedy the issues uncovered in their CQC inspection should be assessed, adding: 'If there is no evidence that necessary actions have been taken to address the concerns identified, and/or a GP contractor cannot provide demonstrable mitigations as to why their action plan is outstanding, a retrospective breach notice may be considered'.

The plan said that London is a 'significant outlier' compared to other regions when it comes to practices receiving 'requires improvement' ratings - 17.6% compared to 10% average across England.

But a spokesperson for Londonwide LMC said: 'Essentially issuing the breach gives NHS England (London) and the local CCG the remit to get involved in the issues that the CQC has raised, so potentially all three bodies could be simultaneously placing demands on a practice.'

Londonwide LMCs medical director Dr Tony Grewal said this was 'completely unnecessary additional jeopardy for practices, at a time when general practice is on its knees'.

GPC chair Dr Chaand Nagpaul, a GP in north west London, said: 'I think it is tragic that we have and NHS where practices are operating in a climate of fear and threat. This is a culture that needs to be reversed, and NHS London automatically issuing breach notices - or assessing for breach notices - is an extremely counter-productive approach that is going to lead to more GPs wanting to leave the profession.

'I think the last thing that a practice that requires improvement needs is a breach notice. I think it is unacceptable and we need to challenge it.'

NHS England (London) told Pulse it has a 'statutory duty to investigate and respond to contractual compliance issues and when a practice receives a rating of inadequate or requires improvement from the CQC, technically, it has immediately breached its contract'.

It added that 'in practice, CQC reports are always reviewed alongside associated evidence and are not immediately served breach notices'.

A spokesperson said: 'Our aim is always to ensure that patients are receiving the safest and best possible care, wherever they live in London, not to create unnecessary hurdles for a practice which needs to make improvements.'

They added: 'NHS England may be justified in issuing a breach notice without a visit, however, we would always advise gathering the evidence to support any decision and all decisions are taken on a case by case basis, this is not a blanket approach applied to all inadequate CQC ratings.'

CQC inspections destabilising struggling practices

The GPC has said it will campaign for struggling practices not to have to go through a CQC inspection, as the first step of its attempt to get the whole regime replaced, after finding CQC inspections have been the ’final nail in the coffin’ for some struggling practices.

Evidence of this was seen when Pulse reported in May that a practice had been closed down by the CQC while waiting for funding promised as part of NHS England’s vulnerable practice fund.

Meanwhile, the body that funds the GPC - the GP Defence Fund - is funding a judicial review against the CQC, while also last month, the GPC released a report showing that practices with poor CQC ratings receive less funding.

 

 

 

 

Readers' comments (21)

  • Where in the contract does it say any of this?

    The lawyers are the only winners here.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Time to go lads & lasses - I really think the world has gone completely mad now....

    Presumably when there is no primary care they wont need to spend any money on it - just think of the savings!!

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Peter Swinyard

    This is a total disaster for English general practice. For some reason, our political masters seem to believe that we are more risky than practices in Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland and therefore need a punitive, damaging, time-wasting and money-squandering regime of power and control over us to avoid having dust behind the books on a bookshelf or, heaven forbid, a missing protocol or policy. It's time to get a reality check and make CQC as redundant in fact as it is in principle.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Let it all go private and then set up chambers with lawyers and advise the pts how to sue the private companies- class actions would be on the increase -especially if the CQC inspectors - (and I assume that they will inspect the private companies surgeries to the same standards and issue the ratings on the same criteria )keep inspecting when it does go private !?

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • The CQC are not exactly error proof. If they make an error, then NHSE automatically issue a breech notice as a result - who get taken to court?

    Both of them?

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Curious to see how effective BMA, GPC and LMCs will be. In the meantime, I am neither holding my breath nor biting my nails.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • This kind of $#!* is exactly why people are leaving General Practice and why no new doctors are coming in. Seriously why are we bothering with meetings and campaigns on how to get young docs into GP when this kind of stuff is constantly happening?

    And by the way why is it that whenever NHS England say anything it reads like Orwellian newspeak?

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • millions spent

    no effect on morbidity or mortality

    when will the madness end?

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Folks, this is all part of the plan to kill GMS.

    1) Underfund, preventing quality
    2) Inspect for quality (it doesn't work)
    3) Punish for quality
    4) Use 'quality' as the basis for closing existing services.
    5) Contract on a fixed term basis for a new service with far more management power for the commissioner.

    If the life expectancy is three score and ten, as of today the NHS has 2 years and counting.

    Happy birthday old girl. Have some diamorph.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • I seem to recall the CQC totally cocking up on (un)intelligent monitoring of GP practices a few years ago. An apology had to be beaten out of Field. Wasnt that a breach of contract?

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

View results 10 results per page20 results per page50 results per page

Have your say

IMPORTANT: On Wednesday 7 December 2016, we implemented a new log in system, and if you have not updated your details you may experience difficulties logging in. Update your details here. Only GMC-registered doctors are able to comment on this site.