Cookie policy notice

By continuing to use this site you agree to our cookies policy below:
Since 26 May 2011, the law now states that cookies on websites can ony be used with your specific consent. Cookies allow us to ensure that you enjoy the best browsing experience.

This site is intended for health professionals only

At the heart of general practice since 1960

GPs to be interviewed to measure their compassion, says CQC lead

Exclusive: CQC inspectors will measure how caring and compassionate practices are by speaking to GPs, as well as staff and patients, to ‘get a sense of the practice’s values’ under plans being formulated by the regulator.

In an exclusive interview with Pulse, Professor Nigel Sparrow, national professional advisor for primary care for the CQC, revealed that the regulator was looking at ways of measuring practice values in an effort to make the inspection regime more ‘holistic’.

He also indicated that the frequency of the inspections would be risk-based, with practices where there has been safety concerns being inspected more frequently.

This follows health secretary Jeremy Hunt’s announcement last month, of a ‘rigorous’ new inspection regime of GP practices, which included a revamp of the way inspections were carried out and a new chief inspector of primary care.

The CQC began its inspections of practices just two months ago, with practices due to be inspected every two years by the regulator. But Professor Sparrow revealed that the regulator was already looking at how it can improve the inspection regime to take account of the ‘less easily measured aspects of general practice’.

Professor Sparrow said: ‘Currently we [the CQC] have lots of information sources, lots of metrics, but they don’t include the things to do with care, compassion and values. It goes back to the idea of holistic care.

‘We will look at this, but I think the only way to measure these things will be for inspectors to talk to people in the practice, that way they will get a sense of the practice’s values. We really want to find out: is the system well led, safe, caring, is it responsive to people’s needs?’

Professor Sparrow confirmed that this included speaking to GPs. He said: ‘When I used to visit practices for training practice accreditation, I used to spend a few minutes sitting in the waiting room and those few minutes were extraordinarily valuable.

‘They are not the things you can measure through numerics, but it gives you a general impression of the culture of that practice and how caring and compassionate those staff are, and I think it is important that we include that in our inspection regime.

‘When you discuss the way that the practice functions with a doctor, you get an idea of the culture and ethos of that practice and that builds into the dataset. So we look at data, we listen to patients and we talk to people.’

Pulse revealed last month that the CQC was planning to measure practices on five domains, including how caring they were for patients, and this is the first indication of how they may be applied.

Professor Sparrow also confirmed he anticipated a move towards practices deemed at high risk inspected more frequently than those deemed less risky to the public.

He said: ‘We haven’t decided on frequency, but I think it will be largely risk-based. Any practices that have declared non-compliance will be visited sooner rather than later, and those where safety concerns have been highlighted. So it will be about risk-based assessments. We don’t want to be visiting practices unnecessarily.’

He added he expected that each inspector would have a GP, practice nurse or practice manager present at all inspections to advise them. So far the CQC has appointed 65 GPs, practice nurses or practice managers to accompany inspectors, but it is looking to recruit ‘as many as possible’, he added.

A CQC spokesperson said that from July the CQC will begin a public consultation on the set of fundamental standards that all health and social care providers should meet and that next year there will also be a consultation specifically on how primary medical services should be inspected.

He confirmed it is likely that this will be led by the new chief inspector of primary care once they are in their role, but it will be informed by a stakeholder’s advisory group that includes GPC, RCGP and Family Doctors Association representatives. The CQC said they are still in the process of defining what the chief inspector of primary care’s role and remit will be.

Dr Mohammed Jiva, medical secretary at Rotherham and Bury LMC questioned how care and compassion would be measured, and said it would rely on individual inspectors’ perceptions.

He said: ‘The question I would ask; what tool will be used to measure compassion? Is it going to be patient feedback, carer feedback, professional feedback? It needs to be evidence-based and something that can be applied nationally.

‘Part of this relies on individual perception. The GP may be put in a difficult position because of local commissioning requirements. They GP can’t give the patients what they want due to commissioning restraints. The patient perceives they are not compassionate and understanding. The CQC will need to ensure that they understand that this is not the GP’s fault.’

Related images

  • Nigel Sparrow
  • CQC logo

Readers' comments (44)

  • We are patient health advocates, sometimes you have to be unkind and not compassionate to help patients change behaviour , and to encourage self management behaviour.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • What a joke. You cant measure compassion, its an abstract quality, and trying to measure it just feels like another slap in the face for hard working general practitioners. Government needs to RACK OFF!!!

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Vinci Ho

    I recommend CQC to have a role play included in their training programme for these assessors or inspectors where the actor to be interviewed would play Harold Shipman 😳

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • May the best actor win.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • I tend to find that people with small feet are very compassionate. CQC should check shoes sizes.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • @Anonymous | 12 June 2013 7:48am

    We're all government's lackey's now..stopped being patient's advocates a long time ago but sounds good when taking your MRCGP

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • The cynicism in the comments above just go to show that there is a huge rot at the heart of general practice.Good on you Prof Sparrow; we need to weed out the bad apples.Medicine should be for those with a vocation not money grabbers

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Really Prof
    "‘They are not the things you can measure through numerics, but it gives you a general impression of the culture of that practice and how caring and compassionate those staff are, and I think it is important that we include that in our inspection regime."

    You wish to include things that cannot be measured in your inspection regime......

    This from the CQC which is still deciding what it's standards are and a Chief inspector of GP's who's remit is still to be decided.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Ther is cynicism in the profession when it has been treated in a cynical way by the political class.How will they sort out the compassion fatigue which is rampant throughout the NHS.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • If I decide not to play 'ball' with the inspectors, does this prove my practice is not compassionate? On the other hand, if I can 'ham it up', does this prove my compassion?

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

View results 10 results per page20 results per page50 results per page

Have your say