This site is intended for health professionals only

At the heart of general practice since 1960

pul jul aug2020 cover 80x101px
Read the latest issue online

Independents' Day

How much more am I going to have to pay the CQC?

GPs face covering the full cost of inspections – an increase of £15k in fees for some. Jaimie Kaffash and Joe Davis report

Percentage rate rising 3x2

GP practices are facing a 567% increase in CQC fees within as little as two years.

In a consultation document released earlier this month, the regulator has proposed a set of radical fee hikes that will see providers covering the full cost of inspections.

As a result, larger practices could see their fees rise by more than £15,000 – from £2,681 this year to £17,893 in 2017/18. Small and medium-sized practices fare little better (see table below).

In response, the Department of Health has said it will put £15m into the GP contract for next year to cover most of the additional fees, and will review future years’ costs.

But the GPC warned this would not be enough, saying the huge increase in fees was ‘unacceptable’ and that it could be the ‘final straw’ for some struggling practices.

Pulse reported earlier this year that fees could double, as the CQC was having to move to a funding structure whereby providers would cover the full costs of inspection. However, initial indications proved an underestimate, with a consultation published last month saying that, in the best-case scenario, practices will have to pay an increase of 567% in fees by 2019/20, with incremental increases each year until then. In the worst case, they will face paying the full increase by 2017/18.

A DH spokesperson told Pulse it was putting £15m into the GP contract to help practices with the rise in CQC fees.

The spokesperson said: ‘We want the NHS to be the safest health care service in the world and the CQC plays a vital role in that. We have always been clear that we expect the CQC to recover its costs through fees.’

Practice increase in fees 580pxwide

Little value

The DH claimed the additional funding should cover the increases in 2016/17, However, it gave no guarantees about covering increases in subsequent years.

The GPC has moved to fight the proposed fee increases. Deputy chair Dr Richard Vautrey said: ‘We have been having robust discussions not only with CQC but with the DH and NHS England about the unacceptable plans for a massive rise in CQC fees.

‘So far, the DH has suggested some reimbursement via expenses but that will not be enough.’

Dr Vautrey added that the increase was made worse because GPs ‘see very little value for what the CQC are actually doing, and yet they are the ones that will be footing the bill for it’.

He said: ‘If anything, for practices that are really struggling and are under financial pressure, the proposals could be the final straw that breaks the camel’s back.’

As a result of expected cuts to its budget, the regulator has already indicated it will scale back the frequency of inspections for practices rated ‘good’ or ‘outstanding’.

In the consultation document, CQC interim chair Michael Mire and chief executive David Behan, say: ‘We do not underestimate the impact on providers of paying fees, and we will continue to look carefully at our costs relating to regulation.

‘We have a responsibility to cover our costs by charging fees, but we are also accountable for demonstrating that we are fair, efficient, effective and proportionate.’

The fee for 2015/16 represented a 9% increase on 2014/15.

Rate this article  (5 average user rating)

Click to rate

  • 1 star out of 5
  • 2 stars out of 5
  • 3 stars out of 5
  • 4 stars out of 5
  • 5 stars out of 5

0 out of 5 stars

Readers' comments (9)

  • How come their fees can go up but ours can't ? I think we should be told .

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • This comment has been moderated.

  • Feel free to express joint the petition:

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • I am not a gp and dont understand why they have to pay an organisation to carry out inspections on them? Am I missing something obvious?
    If these inspections are so important are they done by the government and if so why is not the government funding the bill? Forgive my ignorance.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • The CQC is a quango out of control

    The 38 degrees petition should be 'abolish the CQC' because of the detrimental affect it has on providers and hence affects patient care.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Beyond belief!!!!

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • There is a plan B folks - its called 'resign en masse and tell them our fee'.

    You should try it.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Diversify. Reduce your dependence on GP for your living. Emigrate. Realise your skills, work ethic, team working ability, intelligance and the fact that you are the creme de la creme are very valued in other walks of life. The NHS has absolutely no idea how to treat you with the respect and the reward you deserve nor is it ever likely to. Find a way out.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • I created the petition on 38 degrees as a direct result of the 567% increase which is being imposed. I want a direct statement that confirms fees will be reimbursed BEFORE I believe it!!
    We have managed almost 1000 signatures so far - we need to keep the pressure on - Mr Hunt and his team seem hell bent on reducing Primary Care to its knees.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Karma! Every other profession accepted the regime, kept their head down and just complied. They got inspected by ordinary inspectors at ordinary salaries, hell ... Dentists are even getting a reduction.
    No, not the GPs, protest after protest about incompetent inspectors has led to practices being visited by a huge team of a GP; inspector; specialists; expert by experience; To; Dick; and Harry too.

    End result is you have pushed your own costs through the roof. Good job!

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Have your say