Cookie policy notice

By continuing to use this site you agree to our cookies policy below:
Since 26 May 2011, the law now states that cookies on websites can ony be used with your specific consent. Cookies allow us to ensure that you enjoy the best browsing experience.

This site is intended for health professionals only

At the heart of general practice since 1960

LMC funds legal action against NHS England over Christmas opening breach notices

Exclusive Londonwide LMCs is taking the exceptional move to fund legal action on behalf of practices who were slapped with ‘victimising’ breach notices for closing on Christmas Eve and New Year’s Eve.

Medical director Dr Tony Grewal told Pulse that Londonwide LMCs have recently instructed a firm of solicitors to revive the legal battle on behalf of 11 London GP practices that were served with breach notices in January 2014 for closing early over Christmas - and that it will, jointly with the BMA, foot the practices’ legal fees.

Dr Grewal said the LMCs had taken the unusual move because this was an ‘exceptional case’ which was ‘important enough to make an exception’.

News that the 11 practices were taking action against NHS England first emerged last year. However, Dr Grewal told Pulse that this was later ‘not followed up’ at the time because of issues over funding.

He said: ‘GPDF instructed a firm of solicitors at the time but it wasn’t followed up by the BMA so we decided to start funding it. The fee is being split between the LMC and the GPDF.’

He added: ‘This is an exceptional case, we do not usually pay solicitors’ fees but this was important enough to us to make an exception.’

Even though NHS England had said keeping open during core hours over Christmas was ‘non-negoatiable’, a number of practices chose to defy the decree and follow advice issued by the GPC instead.

However, only the London area team decided to actually issue sanctions on practices that had taken the move, while other areas were more relaxed. Some area teams also pre-agreed with practices that they could close early.

Dr Grewal said: ‘These practices followed BMA advice and were issued breach notices. Other practices which also followed advice were not issued with notices. This is victimisation - they weren’t doing anything evil, they were just being sensible and closing on Christmas Eve when no patients were going to come in anyway.’

Twelve practices in London were served with breach notices for closing early on Christmas Eve 2013, 11 of which decided to appeal the decision.

One practice even received two notices, for having closed both on Christmas and New Years Eve, which caused particular concern because contractual terms state that any breach for which a practice has received a notice cannot be repeated or the practice could potentially have its contract revoked.

The Christmas opening row, which commenced in 2013, preambled the Government’s drive to ensure GP services are available 8-8, seven days per week.

Readers' comments (15)

  • Well done;
    at last some resistance;

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • John Glasspool

    Gosh! The BMA actually DOING something. I must be hallucinating.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Er, looks like the BMA did actually do nothing

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • So my bma membership fee is being used to fund practices who didn't work when they should be. When did Christmas eve and News Years eve become bank holidays? Perhaps the bma would pay for my next locum too

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Vinci Ho

    Interesting situation .
    From the theory of revolution , if each 'participant' takes only one small step more , the ultimate tidal effect will be enormous .
    I think local LMC to fund this 'movement' is financially understandable if there is a generally common feeling in London on this matter.
    Yes, it could be debatable if BMA was involved but it is also about leadership in a battle against a tyranny.....

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Vinci Ho

    On another level of thinking :
    Representative democracy ( which is indirect) Vs
    Direct democracy .

    Think about the pros and cons of each.......

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • High time somebody sued NHSE.[...]
    We need transparency in the system and hope some day we have some action from NHS Fraud becuase GPs are being taken for a ride big time.
    Good to see LMC doing something constructive after all this time.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Tony Grewal is amazing. Really cares. Incredible intelligence.

    - anonymous salaried!

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • I would like to see this type of action a lot more. NHSE seem to just think they can do what they want. There are perhaps areas where it would be more beneficial. My suggestions would be:
    1 - late payments by NHSE
    2 - incorrect payments.
    3 - inaccurate information from the CQC (particularly with regards to intelligent monitoring)

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Halelulia brother

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

View results 10 results per page20 results per page

Have your say

IMPORTANT: On Wednesday 7 December 2016, we implemented a new log in system, and if you have not updated your details you may experience difficulties logging in. Update your details here. Only GMC-registered doctors are able to comment on this site.