Cookie policy notice

By continuing to use this site you agree to our cookies policy below:
Since 26 May 2011, the law now states that cookies on websites can ony be used with your specific consent. Cookies allow us to ensure that you enjoy the best browsing experience.

This site is intended for health professionals only

At the heart of general practice since 1960

Practice immediately shut down after CQC found non-qualified individual taking consultations

The CQC took the unusual step to close a GP practice immediately, after discovering that it was putting patients at ‘serious risk of harm’, including hiring an ‘unqualified individual’ to cover consultations.

Goodwood Court Medical Centre, in Hove, East Sussex, was given an overall CQC inspection rating of ‘inadequate’ after the regulator found it to be in breach of seven key standards of Health and Social Care Act.

Following a series of unannounced inspections at the practice on 4, 8, and 9 June, the CQC said that the practice was failing in all areas including being ‘safe, effective, caring, having responsive services and being well led’.

Among the issues highlighted by the CQC were that the levels of GP cover were of a ‘significant and immediate concern and placed patients at risk of harm’ – and on one of the days of the inspection only two patients were seen by a GP.

Other patients were seen by a nurse practitioner or another individual who was not a GP or nurse; the CQC said there was ‘no evidence that he was qualified to practise as a GP or a physician’s assistant’.

The CQC said that on the basis of the issues it had identified at the practice over the course of its inspections, it had cancelled the practice’s registration. The regulator has insisted that patients affected by the closure have been transferred to another local practice.

The practice’s CQC inspection report said: ‘We found the levels of GP cover to be of significant and immediate concern and placed patients at risk of harm. We found that with the exception of two patients, all patients had either been seen by the nurse practitioner or another individual who was not a GP or nurse.

‘We were told by staff that this person was identified to them as a physician’s assistant. We asked to see the individual’s recruitment checks and the lead GP provided a CV. No other information could be seen as the practice had not carried out robust checks on this individual. There was no evidence that he was qualified to practise as a GP or a physician’s assistant.’

Some of the other problems at the surgery highlighted by the CQC included:

  • Appropriate recruitment checks on staff had not been undertaken prior to their employment and actions identified to address concerns with infection control practice had not been taken
  • Staff were not clear about reporting incidents, near misses and concerns and there was no evidence of learning and communication with staff
  • Medicine management practices were unsafe and placed patients at serious risk of harm – this included requests for prescriptions
  • The practice had no clear leadership structure, insufficient leadership capacity and limited formal governance arrangements
  • Multiple breaches of regulations relating to: effective management; monitoring and improving outcomes for people; effective staffing; working with colleagues and other services; consent to care and treatment; and health promotion and prevention.

Earlier in the week, Pulse reported that the CQC would be changing the way it organises its practice inspections, assigning a named lead inspector for each CCG area from October 2015 in a bid to improve the relationships between practices and inspectors.

 

Readers' comments (29)

  • Hmmm does sound quite bad.
    If that's the standard for being shut down then hopefully I'll be ok!

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • The question here is how did this practice carry on for so long without being shut?

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • there are no qualifications req'd to be a physicians asst -!

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • This is the follow on from:
    http://www.pulsetoday.co.uk/home/finance-and-practice-life-news/gp-practice-takes-on-10000-patients-in-one-go-following-cqc-closure/20010278.article

    Wow. - GMC and NMC check for any new locum is a no brainer. And no GP on the day other than for 2 patients, corners cut that's for sure.

    If they were funded via GMS I guess this corner cutting would be the only way to survive, would have been better to have been a locum, than a partner in this practice.

    Surprised it hadn't folded before given the demographics of the patients.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • 'There was no evidence that he was qualified to practise as a GP.'

    Is that not because he was a PA, can I remind NHSE / CQC etc PAs are not Doctors nor can you try and persuade the public they are….

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Was he a homeopath? Don't worry .They will do a better job than PA's.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • In order to be a qualified Physician Associate and be on the managed voluntary register held at the RCP (which any self respecting employer insists on) there are clearly defined qualifications; an undergraduate life science degree and then 2yrs post graduate qualification and successfully passing the National Exam (both OSCE and written).

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • I hope the clinicians commenting on here and on other articles about PAs are practicing a more evidence based approach to their clinical practice than they do their assumptions and comments about PAs.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Whether we like it or not, the presence of CQC has brought about massive improvements in many areas of General Practice and we all should be grateful for having such an organisation.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • I thought they wanted less GPs consulting,It seems that way over the last 10 years or so abuse .Isn't this a taste of the future healthcare without GP cover .Isn't it what they want?It will be what they get.Why don't they go with the inevitable flow of current NHS policy!

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

View results 10 results per page20 results per page50 results per page

Have your say

IMPORTANT: On Wednesday 7 December 2016, we implemented a new log in system, and if you have not updated your details you may experience difficulties logging in. Update your details here. Only GMC-registered doctors are able to comment on this site.