Cookie policy notice

By continuing to use this site you agree to our cookies policy below:
Since 26 May 2011, the law now states that cookies on websites can ony be used with your specific consent. Cookies allow us to ensure that you enjoy the best browsing experience.

This site is intended for health professionals only

At the heart of general practice since 1960

Reaction: GMC's review of doctor suicides

The GMC will introduce ‘emotional resilience’ training and a national support service for doctors after an internal review found that 28 doctors committed suicide while under investigation by the regulator. Read the reaction here

BMA chair, Dr Mark Porter

Doctors’ first priority is their patients’ care, but we must not forget that they can face the same physical and mental health issues as everyone else, and it is vital that vulnerable doctors undergoing fitness for practice investigations are fully supported.

The GMC’s previous research1 exposed doctors’ views of the investigation process and it is clear that more needs to be done to understand the wider implications on doctors’ mental health, and the care they feel able to deliver.

Many doctors are already facing high levels of stress, with one survey of GPs showing that four in 10 are facing burnout, and a recent BMA survey which highlighted how morale is plummeting at a time when workloads are becoming increasingly unmanageable.

It is in the interests of both doctors and patients that, where appropriate, concerns can be raised and that these are thoroughly investigated. But this process must be fair and offer adequate protection to ensure the system itself does not cause harm.

The BMA provides counselling and support services for all doctors but believes more must be done to help vulnerable doctors who find themselves going through what can be a prolonged and arduous process.

We are pleased that the GMC has acknowledged this and is putting in place measures to provide the right support.

Professor Clare Gerada, medical director of the Practitioner Health Programme

I welcome this long awaited and important review. I applaud the GMC’s openness in putting in the public domain the issue of doctors’ suicides whilst under their process. Going forward they need to continue to show their commitment to reducing the impact of fitness to practise investigations on vulnerable doctors whilst always maintaining patient safety - a substantial task.

Doctors are sometimes patients too and supporting vulnerable doctors is a shared responsibility. It is important that in taking forward the recommendations in the review the GMC works in partnership with everyone who has an interest in this area including the Practitioner Health Programme, the Royal College of Psychiatrists and the BMA.

Dr Maureen Baker, RCGP chair

Patient safety must be paramount in any fitness to practise process, but it is also essential that GPs and all doctors are investigated fairly and sensitively. It is shocking that so many of them have taken their own lives while investigations have been ongoing.

The alarming doctor suicide statistics are proof that something must be done to ease the stress on doctors undergoing fitness to practise investigations.

The RCGP welcomes the GMC’s assurance that no GP under investigation should be treated as a guilty party before the process has reached its conclusions - and that throughout they receive all the support and advice they need.

We also support the proposal to speed up the fitness to practise procedures - the GMC must thoroughly investigate allegations of malpractice, but some investigations extend for many years and this adds extra stress for all parties concerned.

Even GPs who fail to live up to the highest professional standards can be better served by a swift investigation followed by offers of professional help where appropriate. We support the recommendation that the GMC will appoint a senior medical officer to deal specifically with health issues affecting the doctors concerned.

GPs everywhere are reporting high levels of stress as we struggle to provide care to our patients, often in very difficult circumstances due to lack of funding, significant increases in patient consultations and difficulties in trying to recruit sufficient GPs to meet patients’ needs.

Today’s statistics are a wake-up call for us to do more to support GPs and to prevent problems arising in the interests of patient safety.

 

 

Rate this article  (3.58 average user rating)

Click to rate

  • 1 star out of 5
  • 2 stars out of 5
  • 3 stars out of 5
  • 4 stars out of 5
  • 5 stars out of 5

0 out of 5 stars

Readers' comments (6)

  • Vinci Ho

    (1)I think there is a difference between .....' our first duty must , of course, be to protect patients....' and ' our first duty must , of course , be to investigate to see if GMC rules are broken....'
    This is important as a politically correct statement from Niall Dickinson.Otherwise , it is presumed guilty instead of innocent.
    (2)The currently set low threshold to trigger an official accusation in all forms( complaints , legal actions from no win , no fee legal firms, reporting to GMC) has certainly been eroding into the principle of presumed innocent and guilty until proven in Common Law. This has been interpreted as better way of 'protecting the patients' . Question remains ' have they got it right and proved doctors guilty in most of the cases?' I think the evidences presented even by GMC has explained that.
    Are patients better protected? I guess not . In fact , it is worse because whistleblowers are subjected to this cruelty as well. Where is the justice to be set?
    GMC has a lot to answer to the public if a system like itself has the risks of causing substantial cases of miscarriage of justice but let loose the real culprits......
    (3)Niall Dickinson needs to realise that the current process of referring to fitness to practice panel of GMC can be abused as a mean of bullying. Clearly, bullying can lead to death .
    Reading the comments( nearly 100 comments) in the main article on the subject , the process of handling a referral case appears to be flawed. Disrespectful, presumed guilty and disdainful are the main themes. Even the Police cannot behave in these ways when they are at the stage of receiving and investigating a crime.Yes,the whistleblowing can be true as well as false allegation .GMC must serve for both fairness and justice. This is no country like China , Russia or North Korea . There is a reason why Themis , the Greek Goddess , is blindfolded for objectivity. Not sure GMC had displayed an understanding of that?

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • John Glasspool

    None of the three "leading doctors" above have said that it is appalling that 28 doctors have lost their lives- some no doubt might have been helped to avoid suicide and even more had not the GMC's processes been so careless of doctors' lives.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • The big issue is the horrible letter ,the attack on vulnerable doctors and remember that the real s...s don't care and just protest .i worry about the wronged and the process

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • The usual meaningless platitudes from the Quislings of the RCGP and BMA.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Vinci Ho

    Up to date, there are now well over 360 comments in the main article on the subject , Mr Dickinson .

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • The first duty is surely the health and safety of the doctor - a healthy happy and well supported doctor is less likely to be vulnerable or to face a fitness to practice investigation. As a profession we need to be able to provide peer support without it being perceived that we are closing ranks. The writing has been on the wall since the profession has been under seige

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Have your say