This site is intended for health professionals only


Legal experts say GPs are able to take strike action

Legal experts say GPs are able to take strike action

Legal experts have said that withdrawing services for a day is an option on the table for GPs – but a ‘lack of appetite’ for strikes in the profession could represent an issue.

The BMA said it was looking at ‘all options’, including ‘industrial or collective action’ after it rejected a contract offer from NHS England, which proposed linking more funding to access measures and mandating practices to offer automated access to patient records by 31 July.

Last week, the BMA said the Government had expressed a willingness to make changes to incentive schemes but that GPs would still be ‘forced to’ consider actions if a contract ended up being imposed.

It has been thought that ‘strike’ action, or something similar – with GPs withdrawing services for a day – would not be possible because GPs are not employed.

But legal experts have told Pulse that this kind of option was a possibility for GP practices. However, GP leaders have warned that there is little appetite for such action.

The initial contract offer, which was labelled by the BMA as ‘insulting’, included a £305m in the investment and impact fund (IIF) – the incentive fund for PCNs and an access marker added to the QOF, plus the inclusion of the cholesterol-lowering injection, Inclisiran.

The offer also included no uplift to childhood immunisations or global sum, and pushing forward with pay transparency.

Professor Gregor Gall, an industrial relations professor at the University of Glasgow, told Pulse that GPs could theoretically decide to shut for the day and therefore breach their contract.

He said: ‘GP partners are in a situation of not being employed, so the issue is one not of an employment contract (of services) but a commercial one (for services).

‘Consequently, while the GPs and the BMA could term what they might want to as “strike” or “industrial action”, in actual fact, this would be a situation of breaking a commercial contract.

‘Depending upon the content of those contracts, there could be financial (likes fines) and other consequences for doing so (like termination).’

But he said that given existing demand pressures upon GPs and the lack of a new supply, any health authority is not likely to do much that would jeopardise the continuation of those contracts, for fear of creating even more disruption and eliciting a huge public backlash.

Daniel Wilde, a partner specialising in employment law at Harding Evans solicitors, explained that GPs can’t be in an industrial dispute with their employers because partners are not employees.

He added: ‘But they can be in a dispute with the contracting body, their commissioners. As long as the BMA’s ballot is lawful, there is no reason GPs cannot close for the day as a form of industrial action (or only offer urgent care).’  

A BMA spokesperson said: ‘We will be considering all options in relation to ensuring we see adequate funding, and safe working conditions.

‘GPC England recently rejected inadequate updates to the GP contract in England for this year, and continues working towards securing a safe and fair new contract for general practice for 2024 and beyond, when the current five-year framework comes to an end.

‘Discussions with GPC England and LMCs will be vital in shaping the direction we take next.’

But some GP leaders said they think there would be little support for strike action.

Dr Brian Balmer, chief executive of Essex LMC, said: ‘It is very unlikely that GPs would support such action as their relationship with patients and their links to their local community make this a very difficult choice.

‘Paradoxically NHSE policy which seems to be moving towards a salaried service would increase the chance of successful industrial action.’

Dr Peter Holden, GPC rep in Derbyshire, said that there is an appetite for strike action but ‘the risk is indigestible unless everybody does it.’

He added: ‘If I go on strike, not only am I in breach of contract and I might lose my contract, but the consequences of loss of contract are, I’m left with a surgery mortgage hanging over my head with no means to pay it, and redundancy payments to my staff with no means of paying that. I’d go bankrupt. 

‘I don’t think it’s unlikely, I think it’s going to require some effort. We are at the point now where, if we don’t get a new contract and we do not reduce our workload, there will be no general practice left because people are leaving in droves.’

Dr Clare Sieber, a former GPC representative for East/West Sussex, told Pulse that in her opinion GP leaders ‘have spoken loud and clear’ about industrial action in the past, and that she is ‘still a fan of the PCN DES withdrawal’ as it would not represent a breach of contract.

She said: ‘GPs want a new tariff-based contract which subsumes the PCN DES with more flexibility around private services.

‘We can negotiate this once we have progressed with industrial or collective action. There’s no other way we can get what we want.   

‘GPC members often complain that it can’t take collective mass action because the profession won’t follow it, but at the same time I don’t see it organising coordinated mass action that colleagues can really get behind. 

 ‘GPC needs to come out to practices with an honest appraisal of the situation and take control. Practices need to be balloted once GPCE is clear what it wants to negotiate on our behalf, and what it wants practices to do for it.’  

It is expected that England’s junior doctors will strike for 72 hours in March, subject to the result of a ballot which is due to be announced today.

GP trainees will not be barred from protesting during potential upcoming junior doctor strikes, but will only be able to join a picket line at or close to the hospital they are currently working in, the BMA has said.


          

READERS' COMMENTS [9]

Please note, only GPs are permitted to add comments to articles

Michael Green 20 February, 2023 9:54 am

Why a 1 day “strike”? Why not complete withdrawal of NHS services?

Who else will see 2 million appointments per day? Hancock’s AI bot? Who else will “kindly” follow the orders from the FY2 in A&E?

And if the end game is qualified doctors for the middle classes and highly specialist extended scope advanced clinical practitioners for everybody else – if this is the “will of the people” expressed through their democratically elected slimy overlords – then let’s just bloody get on with it!

SUBHASH BHATT 20 February, 2023 11:06 am

If gp practices closes then it will not make much difference. Think it was a bank holiday. Emergencies are delt with in an and e and others can wait for 24 hours. It will just ring bad name to general practice.
This will not happen.

Munir Datoo 20 February, 2023 1:30 pm

Agree with Subash. There would no booked routine appointment on the day of the strike, patient will book after the strike day, so not going to make any difference

Gary Armstrong 20 February, 2023 1:34 pm

Imagine the headlines in the Telegraph and the Mail! We should take action but it should not harm patients but focus on impacting the irrelevant bureaucracy that distracts us from our clinical work. For instance all practices could decline to engage with the cqc for routine inspections or data collection. The BMA should highlight the time saved and how this is helping patients with improved access etc. There are many such options.
Ultimately if a new contract does not reflect the needs of General practice and our patients we should stand together and work on an alternative model outside of the NHS.

Truth Finder 20 February, 2023 3:20 pm

One day will not make any difference. Get us a proper deal or turn us all private BMA. Then we will “strike” meaningfully.

Bonglim Bong 20 February, 2023 3:46 pm

There are plenty of ‘work to rule’ type changes which can be done before any official strike action.

There are 4 million people taking atorvastatin each month – costing about £1 each.
lipitor costs 22x as much (or 26x for higher doses).

Simply changing everyone from atorvastatin to lipitor will cost the NHS an extra 1 billion per year.
Can repeat with a new drug each month.

nobody harmed from closure.
no emergencies avoided.
no work building up for the next day.

John Evans 21 February, 2023 11:07 am

People have overestimated the beneficial effect of the work to rule measures. It will just irritate patients and take up time explaining / enforcing / responding to complaints.

Agree about short term strikes.

Withdrawal of services until item of service used to pay GPs. The fact is that GP workload is so huge that the item of service fee could still be low enough that the Daily Hate et al could be countered quite easily.

Dave Haddock 21 February, 2023 1:31 pm

If the BMA want to claim to represent the interest’s of GPs, the BMA need to produce a plan for GP service provision outside of the NHS. And should have done years ago.
Anything less is meaningless.

John Evans 21 February, 2023 7:02 pm

In the past too many in the BMA negotiating team were ideologically opposed to exploring other options for the Drs / GPs that they are funded by to represent.

Pre-new GMS 2002 average GP income was 70-85000.
In 2022 that would be over 120000.
Yet average income in 2021-2022 was 211000.

However, that does not reflect the change in workload (gave up out of hours and gained QOF amongst other things).

When compared to first year after QOF:
2004 average GP salary was 102000.
Allowing for inflationary increase this would be in excess of 162000.

Income will not be increased to catch up with inflation.
Workload / intensity are the key areas to address – this would fit with the tolerated justification of improving the service for patients by allowing sufficient time, etc