This site is intended for health professionals only

Pharmacists to access and add to GP record by end of year

Pharmacists to access and add to GP record by end of year

Community pharmacists will be able to access and add to patient records currently maintained by GPs by the end of this year.

This was announced as part of NHS England and the Government’s long-awaited GP recovery plan, which was finally published last week.

But while GPs acknowledged that a level of access will be required, they highlighted the importance of maintaining patient confidentiality.

Under the plans, GP access will be improved by enabling patients to get prescription medicine directly from pharmacists for seven common conditions, under the Pharmacy First scheme, which would launch by the end of this calendar year.

The plan said this would need to be underpinned by increased cooperation between general practice and pharmacists, including GPs sharing their patient record with pharmacists.

In order to facilitate this, the NHS will ‘invest to significantly improve the digital infrastructure between general practice and community pharmacy’ and NHS England ‘will work with community pharmacy suppliers and general practice IT suppliers to develop and deliver interoperable digital solutions’, the plan said.

This will ‘streamline referrals’ and ‘provide additional access to relevant clinical information from the GP record’, while pharmacists will be able to ‘share structured updates quickly and efficiently following a pharmacy consultation back into the GP patient record’, it added.

‘These IT improvements will improve existing and future services; for example, by allowing GP patient records to be updated following supply of oral contraception or a blood pressure consultation in community pharmacy.’

But GPs told Pulse that while pharmacists will need to see patients’ records when they are given further prescribing powers, this will need to be rolled out taking into account patient confidentiality.

RCGP chair Professor Kamila Hawthorne told Pulse: ‘If pharmacists are to be given more prescribing ability, it’s important they have access to relevant information in a patient’s medical record, in order to roll this out safely – likewise, it’s important the GP knows what a patient has been prescribed outside of the GP practice.

‘However, patient safety and confidentiality must continue to be a priority and this needs to be considered when it comes to the sharing of medical records between general practice and pharmacy.

‘Any innovations need to ensure that appropriate, robust safety and safeguarding measures are in place to maintain the high standards general practice places on patient privacy.’

Dr Neil Bhatia, a GP and records access lead at his practice in Hampshire, said of pharmacists gaining records access: ‘It certainly would be clinically important that they have access to relevant information, so that they don’t start someone on medication that is contraindicated.

‘They do have some basic access currently through the summary care record and one would anticipate that they would benefit from it, as long as the patient understands and knows that the pharmacist will be able to do that.’

However, he argued that ‘in line with current data protection principles they should only be allowed access to the basic information – allergies, medication and relevant or important diagnosis’.

‘It’s important for patients to know that their pharmacists will be able to access their records,’ he also stressed.

The seven conditions for which patients will be asked to visit pharmacies for prescriptions, subject to consultation, are: sinusitis; sore throat; earache; infected insect bite; impetigo; shingles; and uncomplicated urinary tract infections in women.

The recovery plan said the existing oral contraception service would also be expanded, alongside blood pressure checks.

Currently NHS Digital is working to make sure all community pharmacies can view Summary Care Records, which include information about allergies to prevent prescribing errors, current medications prescribed for emergency supply purposes and eligibility for services such as a free flu jab.

NHS Digital said that having instant access to patient information ‘speeds up care, reduces the need for phone calls to GP practices, and reduces referrals to other services,’ particularly out-of-hours.

And last year, MPs were told as part of a parliamentary inquiry that pharmacy teams should have access to up-to-date records information from shared care records, GP Connect and summary care records with additional information.

Last month, a Government review recommended for patients to be able to access their data through the Shared Care Record and add information about their own health and wellbeing.


Visit Pulse Reference for details on 140 symptoms, including easily searchable symptoms and categories, offering you a free platform to check symptoms and receive potential diagnoses during consultations.


Please note, only GPs are permitted to add comments to articles

RAMAN PRABU 16 May, 2023 6:14 pm

NHS is the only organisation in the western world with a multimillion pound budget where no standardised training is provided in use of the IT system. There are no standards of record entry and everyone uses it as they please. We have ED clinicians entering permanent diagnosis like COPD when it should be suspected diagnosis and which we can’t remove in General Practice which messes up our QOF! Why should GP’s be the holders of patient record and responsible for data quality when everyone one else can enter what they want!

Jonathan Gregson 16 May, 2023 6:25 pm

LOL. Is that an EMIS “end of the year”?

Tim Atkinson 16 May, 2023 6:35 pm

Another step closer to big Pharma & GOK who else having access to your records.

Keith M Laycock 16 May, 2023 7:46 pm

Insanity in the midst of madness.

Faraz Majid 16 May, 2023 7:49 pm

Who is going to teach these pharmacists ENT history taking and examination? Will they be required to go on a special ENT course or attachment?
If not will it be guesswork or blind antibiotics for all?
How might the latter affect patient expectations the next time they see their GP with a viral sore throat or cough expecting antibiotics?
What happened to concerns about growing antibiotic resistance and the years of GP bashing for over prescribing….?
A lot of questions here and concerns. This does not appear to have been thought through very well at all.

Bonglim Bong 17 May, 2023 8:33 am

I think there needs to be an urgent rethink about who is the data controller here. If you want it to be the GP surgery they should be able to make decisions in line with that responsibility, i.e. :
The data controller determines the purpose for which and means by which that data is processed.

You can’t have GP surgeries as data controllers and government deciding the purpose or means by which that data is processed.

It should be changed to NHS England, or perhaps more radically the patient – whereby they are in total control of their data and everyone, including GPs gets their permission to access it. (Permission to access it might be a condition of them being a patient at a GP surgery or a condtion of them getting a pharmacist assessment).

Turn out The Lights 17 May, 2023 8:47 am

Spot on BB.We cant be data controllers without control.They just want someone to blame with tin inevitable breach of data.Responsibility should lie with HMG/NHSE.

Rogue 1 17 May, 2023 10:28 am

Correct BB+TOL.
With that as we are no longer the sole holder of the medical record all queries (esp solictors and increasingly families) need to be directed to a national/government office. That would alsotake a weight off the back office

Darren Tymens 17 May, 2023 12:08 pm

This would appear to be another bright idea from someone who doesn’t understand pharmacy, general practice, data privacy laws, public health or antibiotic resistance.
It will obviously cause more problems than it solves.
At the very least, as Dr Bong has said, the government now needs to remove the burden of being data controller from us. We have completely lost control of the medical record due to perpetual NHSE pressure to release access to all and sundry.

Richard Greenway 18 May, 2023 9:29 am

Totally agree TOL +BB+ R1
The issues of data responsibility is getting bigger. GPs made personal financial and time investment in IT systems, developing these databases back in the day, then were forced to give their intellectual property away. At the same time now being held responsible for the data.
I am being told that we now need 4 discrete roles relating to data in our practice (none funded) including Caldicott, DPO, IG lead and SIRO. In the old days your records were property of HMG.