GPs may be asked to join ‘peaceful protests’ organised by the BMA to highlight pressures in general practice, following a vote at the recent LMC conference.
In March, local GP leaders attended a private special conference to debate escalated collective action following the tax hikes announced in the Autumn Budget as well as the Government’s 2025/26 contract offer.
Ahead of the conference, Pulse reported that LMCs would vote on ramping up industrial action to ‘coordinated’ practice closures and ‘collective walkouts’.
The outcomes of the conference were initially private, but the GP Committee England has now shared an update with LMCs which reveals that representatives voted against these escalated collective actions.
But they did call on the GPCE to ‘help GPs promote their work to the public’ by ‘coordinating organised marches and peaceful protests’, and ‘intensively engaging’ with the media, social media influencers and patient advocacy groups.
As part of the same motion, LMC leaders voted against a proposal for a ‘coordinated national day of protest by all GPs and their staff, including practice closures and mass demonstrations’.
On the day of the special conference, health secretary Wes Streeting provided the GPCE with a written commitment to negotiate an entirely new GP contract by the end of this Parliament – which was a precondition for the BMA’s acceptance of 2025/26 contract changes.
The BMA had also confirmed in February, immediately after the 2025/26 contract details were announced, that it was ‘no longer in dispute’ with the Government, meaning national collective action has been paused.
GP leaders also voted for a motion which advises all practices to now issue an ‘indefinite’ fit note on a patient’s first presentation, meaning all further fitness-for-work assessment is passed on to the Department for Work and Pensions.
This is because of the ‘huge number’ of appointments used ‘purely’ for fit notes, the motion said, and the fact that general practice ‘lacks the resources’ to do its job fully, ‘let alone that of DWP’.
However, this instruction to GPs goes against legal advice issued by the BMA along with the agenda in March, which said this motion would be ‘inducing doctors to breach their contracts’ and would ‘carry significant risk’ for the BMA and for doctors individually.
A recent Government-commissioned review argued that the ability of GPs to issue fit notes and deal with work and health issues is ‘questionable’.
The Government also recently announced a raft of welfare reforms in a bid to save over £5bn in the coming years – but it promised to ensure these changes would not increase demand for fit notes or pressure on GPs.
Another motion passed at the private LMC conference included a call on the GPCE to ‘demand of the government immediate clarification’ as to whether GMS practices are ‘NHS entities or private businesses’.
This confusion came to the fore in response to the National Insurance Contributions rises announced in October, which will apply to GP practices but not to other parts of the NHS such as hospitals.
LMC leaders have demanded that the GPCE ‘publish a schedule of minimum private tariffs for services, for immediate implementation’, if the Government confirms that GMS practices are indeed private businesses.
Local GP leaders also called on practices to ‘boycott’ the upcoming requirement from October 2025 to keep online consultation tools open during core hours.
The motion argued that this 2025/26 contractual requirement will ‘lead to waiting lists in general practice’, burnout among staff, and ‘the potential for patient safety concerns’.
As part of the update for LMCs, GPCE chair Dr Katie-Bramall Stainer suggested that although the BMA is no longer in dispute with the Government over the current contract, the outcomes of the conference could provide a blueprint for future disputes.
She said: ‘The sun was shining on Friends House on 19 March, and this Spring has seen unseasonably sunny weather – but storm clouds are on the horizon and will revisit us again.
‘We need to be prepared and understand what, where and how we can secure leverage – with the support of the profession. This was the importance of this Special Conference.’
Following the conference in March, the GPCE told the advised practices to continue local action by refusing unresourced work from local commissioners.
Motions in full
AGENDA COMMITTEE TO BE PROPOSED BY HERTFORDSHIRE: That conference accepts the challenge and importance of remaining united as a profession in order to be a powerful force to enable change. It calls on GPCE to help GPs promote their work to the public by:
(i) coordinating organised marches and peaceful protests to promote general practice, raise awareness of GPs’ commitment to patient care and highlight the escalating pressures faced by GPs (PASSED)
(ii) organising a coordinated national day of protest by all GPs and their staff, including practice closures and mass demonstrations, to highlight the crisis in general practice (DID NOT PASS)
(iii) intensively engaging with local and national media, social media influencers, patient advocacy and charity groups (PASSED)
GATESHEAD AND SOUTH TYNESIDE: That conference, noting the contractual duty of GPs to provide Med3s / fit notes, the huge number of appointments used purely for this purpose and the fact that general practice lacks the resources to do its own job fully, let alone that of the DWP, suggests that all practices now issue an ‘indefinite’ Med3 / fit note on the first presentation, passing all further fitness-for-work assessment to the DWP (PASSED)
BERKSHIRE: That conference believes that in light of the Health Secretary’s assertion that GPs are “not formally part of the NHS”, general practice in England has been operating under a restraint of trade, due to the GMS contract’s restrictions on provision of private services and instructs GPCE to demand of the government immediate clarification as to the status of general practices operating under GMS contracts, as either NHS entities or private businesses. Conference:
(i) demands that government commit to full reimbursement of any increase to employer’s costs (eg employer’s national insurance contributions), if it is established that GMS practices are considered to be NHS entities
(ii) demands that restraints on trade, such as the prohibition of most private services to NHS registered patients, be removed from the GMS contract if it is established that GMS practices are considered to be private businesses
(iii) demands that GPCE should publish a schedule of minimum private tariffs for services, for immediate implementation if it is established that GMS practices are private businesses and not considered to be NHS entities
(iv) demands that GPCE should publish an indicative schedule of minimum private tariffs for services, ahead of any agreement between GPCE and government about whether GMS practices in England may offer these private services to their NHS patients
(v) instructs GPCE (in the event that practices are considered to be private businesses) to seek senior legal opinion as to the viability of legal action against the government in a retrospective claim for losses due to historic restraint of trade on behalf of all GMS contract holders and the estates of deceased contractors (ALL PASSED)
AVON: That conference, in light of the 2025/26 GP contract requirement from October 2025, to keep on-line consultations open from 08.00 until 18.30:
(i) believes that unlimited patient on-line access will increase workload and lead to burnout for all practice staff
(ii) has concerns about the inequity created for those patients unable to submit on-line consultations, thereby increasing health inequalities predicts
(iii) that this will lead to waiting lists in general practice with the potential for patient safety concerns
(iv) foresees the unintended consequences of patients being directed to 111 and emergency departments in order for practices to maintain safe workloads (ALL PASSED)
Source: BMA update
Related Articles
READERS' COMMENTS [3]
Please note, only GPs are permitted to add comments to articles
Has anyone seen the minor surgery DES?! Payments for joint injections and procedures are the same as they were 15-20 years ago.( example : https://gps.northcentrallondon.icb.nhs.uk/cdn/serve/user-7/1453217988-bbab36c7d935aaaaa5300f5bb41d21e2.pdf , https://www.escro.co.uk/trusts/highland/documentation/slas/SOUTH%20AND%20MID/hi_min_surgery_sla.pdf). Who negociated this ?!, what about inflation. Why is it that we are expected to pay more to staff, pay more for equipment, membership fees, but our payments for contracts are fixed for 15 to 20 years.
How do Practices opt out of funding LMCs?
‘peaceful’ GP protests– is there option of doing VIOLENT protest 🙂