A London CCG is considering introducing ‘local budgets’ for GPs to cut back on referrals, which it says will ‘reward more effective management’.
NHS Bexley CCG said it is considering a raft of measures to cut referrals, including incentivising practices to peer-review each referral, increasing ‘primary care investigation’ before referrals and encouraging acute providers to reject inappropriate referrals.
It said it is taking the measures after a 16% spike in referrals last year.
But the LMC has said that the CCG is placing the blame on GPs when the real reasons for the increase in referrals is extra patient demand and a lack of clinical pathways for some conditions, which can result in providers having to go back to a GP for further referrals for supporting tests.
The 16% increase in referral numbers emerged when Bexley CCG compared GP referral activity in 2013/14 with that in April to September for 2014/15.
The CCG said in board papers that, ‘given the rise reported in recent months and the significant risk to commissioned budgets’, it would have to develop a ‘further range of strategies to manage demand’.
It said it was considering the ‘introduction of locality budgets for elective activity, which will reward more effective management by practices’.
Other initiatives included ‘incentivising practices to peer-review each referral’ and the ‘use of mandatory care pathways, requiring specific ‘work-up’ and primary care investigation, before referral
A CCG spokesperson added: ‘We are currently reviewing data and working with practices to identify the most appropriate actions and will be giving further updates to the governing body as work progresses. Ultimately the CCG will work with practices to ensure that referrals provide the best possible outcomes for patients.’
However, a statement from Londonwide LMCs and Bexley LMC said: ‘The value judgement that an increase in GP referrals is a cause for concern is questionable, hence the LMC is actively in dialogue with the CCG regarding their perception that the data may in any way be reflective of poor or inappropriate referrals by the GPs in Bexley and to explore how they can support GPs in managing these rising demands.’
It adds: “We have always had a progressive and open approach to referral management and are wholly supportive of sustaining good referral practice reflecting good clinical care. This has been achieved through the engagement of peer review and a referral management and booking service.’