If I were a patient I would not want to have a communication entered into my records that I was not aware
For 20 years I have written on my letters to hospitals that it is my practice to share correspondence with patients. My practice has 600 patients that have access to their electronic contemporary medical records, and if I were a patient I would not want to have a communication entered into my records that I was not aware. I would also wish be informed of a communication from a third party that referred to myself being entered into my records. It is uncommon to receive communications about patients that are unsolicited of which the patients are unaware, but I generally deal with such a communication by asking the patient to attend to discuss the issues within the communication.
I try to do this in a diplomatic way, referring to past issues related to those within the communication. If there are no past references I try to find another reason to interview the patient that does not compromise the third party. If I do not believe the communication or feel that it should be ignored, I do not enter it into the patient’s notes.
If someone else had entered the communication into the notes, I would firstly ask the author if I could share the communication with the patient. If they said I could share the comunication, I would. If they said that I could not, I would feel disappointed that the issue had not been sorted out at the receipt of the communication. I would feel obliged to share the contents with the patient, but not the details of the author.
Dr Richard Fitton is a GP in Glossop, Derbyshire, and a Caldicott Guardian.
Try to view this as something positive, not adversarial
The first thing a request like this generates in GPs is anxiety.
Why does the patient want to look at their notes? Have we done something wrong? Is it a fault in us that made the patient ‘upset’? Why is it such a worry that some information from her college counsellor might be bad for her to see? Is she psychologically or mentally ill? Or just curious, unfamiliar with a GP who asks about her general wellbeing, and anxious about her medical record?
Try to view this as something positive, not adversarial. Access to the notes should be with a doctor, preferably one in the practice who knows the patient, perhaps the one who recently saw her. Let the patient lead the discussion about her record as she looks at it. Try to understand what this particular patient wants.
The points I would see as important for her to confirm are that: the record is confidential; the counsellor would only have communicated in the patient’s best interests; if she does have any problems with college work, information would only be of benefit; and that employers in the future do not have access to confidential medical records (making sure that the information has not been put in a summary entry).
If she is not content one might offer to ‘hide’ the note with increased security, but explain why you would be unhappy to remove it (unless with consultation with the relevant medical defence body). I hope that the meeting would be productive in mutual understanding, though if our biggest fear is realised – that she is suffering from early severe mental illness – this might not be possible. The GP would have to hold their anxiety and the patient’s unhappiness, knowing that they had not done something wrong.
Dr David Watt is a GP in Hackney, east London, and the vice president of the UK Balint Society.
It is not enough to refuse someone the right to see their records on the grounds that they may become upset or angry
The Data Protection Act 1998 gives people the right to see their own health records, a request that should be made in writing. Access to health records can be refused if disclosure would be ‘likely to cause serious harm to the physical or mental health or condition of the data subject or another person’.
Mind is concerned that this particular provision may be over-used in response to requests from people with mental health problems. The key thing to bear in mind here is that the test is ‘likelihood of serious harm’. It is not enough to refuse someone the right to see their records on the grounds that they may become upset or angry. If you consider there is a real likelihood of harm, you must consult with the person most recently responsible for the patient’s clinical care in connection with the data requested.
There are rules around disclosing information supplied by a third party, which in this case is the college counsellor. If the counsellor is a health professional with care of the patient, then disclosure can take place without obtaining his or her consent. A college counsellor would generally make clear at the outset that they were writing to the GP.
If you do give her access to her records, make sure she is aware that she has a right under the Act to have the notes amended if they are factually inaccurate. If the patient disagrees with a matter of opinion, it is good practice to record this. If you are concerned that the records might upset her, offer to talk her through what is written and answer any questions she may have.
Bridget O’Connell is the head of information at the mental health charity MIND.
What would you have done in these circumstances? Do you agree with the panel’s advice?
Pulse Live: 30 April – 1 May, Birmingham
Dr Kartik Modha, a GP in London and founder of Tiko’s GP Group, will look at how technology and social media is changing GPs’ practice at Pulse Live, Pulse’s new two-day annual conference for GPs, practice managers and primary care managers, will cover the latest developments in telehealth.
Pulse Live offers practical advice on key clinical and practice business topics, as well as an opportunity to debate the future of the profession, and a top range of speakers includes NICE chair designate Professor David Haslam, GPC deputy chair Dr Richard Vautrey and the Rt Hon Stephen Dorrell MP, chair of the House of Commons health committee.
To find out more and book your place, please click here.