This site is intended for health professionals only


Should GPs charge for non-NHS services?



I am writing this on a train up to Edinburgh for the LMCs Conference. I am reading the agenda for this annual meeting of medical leaders as the sheep and the fields rush by.

The agenda will set the policy direction for the next year for the BMA and contains the usual mix of the earnest and the absurd – lots of mentions of ‘disappointment’, ‘concern’ and ‘demands’ for change. There is a whole angry debate on the inadequacies of the GP Forward View – alongside a call for an apology from the GPC for the rescue package. 

It is not likely to top the drama of last year’s vote for mass resignation, although that did not turn out exactly as planned in the end. But there is yet another ‘no confidence’ vote on the CQC and a call for GPs to stop prescribing OTC medications.

But one debate is causing controversy. There are a series of calls for GPs to be able to charge their patients for non-NHS treatment, and this has already caused some national attention.

I have no idea how this vote will go. There seems to have been a big increase in companies offering fully private GP services and LMCs individually have recently been looking closely at how practices could get a piece of this action by charging their own patients for non-core work.

But the regulations are a minefield in this area (see here for a quick run-down) and proposals for wider GP charging have been rejected by previous LMCs Conferences, despite there being some support for it within the profession.

And no doubt there will be strong views on either side. Those voting for will argue that practice closures are at record levels and something has to be done to make general practice more sustainable. All businesses seek to diversify their income streams to ensure that they can survive.

On the other side, it will be portrayed as resulting in a two-tier service adversely affecting the most vulnerable, a retreat from the principle that the NHS should be ‘free at the point of use’ and perhaps even worse, will be a powerful new weapon for the Daily Mail to beat the profession over the head with.

Extending patient charging is a politically charged issue at the best of times, but having such a vote during an general election could be potentially explosive for the profession.  

I predict a lively debate at the conference tomorrow, I urge members to vote very carefully.

Nigel Praities is editor of Pulse

This motion was passed at the conference on Thursday – see the full story here