The cynic in me thinks that the furore over GPs conducting care homes visits was a kite flying exercise by NHS England, designed to make GPs grateful for whatever they get.
If so, it has worked. The reaction to the new contract has been fairly positive. Our verdict is that it is as good as could have been. Let us emphasise that ‘as it could have been’ is doing a lot of work in that sentence.
Because political realities mean that it would’ve been impossible for NHS England and the BMA to come up with much better. Everyone (even, I suspect, NHS England) would love to see GPs being given money to just get on with their job, without strings attached. We’d all love the CQC inspection process to be overhauled, so it actually helps practices, rather than become a burden. We’d all love new services to immediately triage patients who have no need for a GP practice away from the GP practice.
But, let’s face it, this was never going to happen. Even with this rather modest boost to general practice, I’ve seen some experts on social media talk about ‘mouths being stuffed with gold’.
So the GPC and NHS England should be congratulated. The £20k incentive for GPs to become partners is a decent outcome (even if it doesn’t sound much when spread over the five years that GPs will need to stay partners, and taking into account tax and superannuation).
Political realities mean that it would’ve been impossible to come up with much better
The funding for new staff will reach £1.13m for an average PCN by 2022/23, and the introduction of mental health workers and potentially advanced nurse practitioners should help alleviate workload. Whether there are enough out there is another matter altogether.
The service specifications are certainly an improvement on the draft ones and, indeed, if anyone saw the mention of enhanced care home support in last year’s contract, then the outcome is probably half-way between their biggest hopes and worst fears.
Again, the global sum increase of 4% is not too bad – unless you are an MPIG practice, or one that relies on seniority payments.
One thing that is looming is the ‘patient experience’ measures. There isn’t much detail, but the contract does say these will be linked to incentives. But there’s a thin line between the carrot and the stick – I fear that practices who score low on these measures may find themselves facing punishment.
This is not the time for GPs to celebrate in the streets. But it might be the best they could’ve hoped for.
Jaimie Kaffash is editor of Pulse. Follow him on Twitter @jkaffash or email him at firstname.lastname@example.org