Cookie policy notice

By continuing to use this site you agree to our cookies policy below:
Since 26 May 2011, the law now states that cookies on websites can ony be used with your specific consent. Cookies allow us to ensure that you enjoy the best browsing experience.

This site is intended for health professionals only

At the heart of general practice since 1960

GPs at forefront of major national MMR catch-up campaign to prevent measles outbreaks

GPs across England will be tasked with identifying and vaccinating up to a million children who are not fully immunised against measles over the next five months, under a large-scale catch-up campaign announced by Public Health England today.

The campaign is designed to boost MMR immunisation rates to above 95% in all 10 to 16 year olds before the new school year in September and could see some GP practices inviting hundreds of extra patients to have MMR jabs.

Local area teams will determine how patients will be targeted, but Public Health England said that it expected GPs to do the majority of the work, going through their practice lists to identify patients at-risk and then inviting them for vaccinations.

Pulse understands that details of how practices will be paid for the additional work expected under the scheme are still being negotiated with the GPC, but the administration of the vaccine in those aged five to nine years would be covered under the GMS contract.

Pulse revealed last week that the RCGP and the BMA were both calling for the NHS to launch a national public health campaign led by GPs to prevent further outbreaks of measles.

Public Health England has now heeded this call and said the ‘best estimate’ of how many young people need vaccinating in total was just under one million, with two-thirds of of that total comprising 10 to 16 year olds needing at least one dose to be fully protected against measles.

The campaign targets this age group as they were most affected by the autism scare over the MMR vaccine, and aims to immunise them all with at least one dose of MMR by September, in time for the next wave of school entrants.

The catch-up campaign will be tailored by NHS England area teams working with directors of public health in local government and LMCs depending on local MMR uptake. The campaign will also include relevant schools-based immunisation programmes, if needed.

Kate Davies, Head of Public Health at NHS England, said: ‘Around 1,600 vaccinations are expected each month. This is a campaign across the whole of England and NHS England can reassure everyone that there are sufficient supplies of vaccine to do this. 

‘GPs will also be checking their lists to proactively identify children and young people who have not been vaccinated or have only had one dose and calling them in. 

‘Parents and young people don’t need to wait to be contacted. If they are worried they should contact their GP surgery.’

Dr Laurence Buckman, GPC chair, said he was ‘very pleased’ the programme was being launched. He said: ‘We have already written to Public Health England and have had discussions with them about our call for an urgent MMR catch-up programme to target as many 10 to 16 year olds as possible who were not vaccinated as children or only received one injection. This must be done before the next school year starts. 

‘For it to be successful Public Health England, local authorities, NHS England and GPs need to work together. This is the first big test for integrated working between these organisations since the NHS was restructured and it is important that we make it a success. 

‘We need to ensure that this is carefully planned so that as many individuals as possible are vaccinated and further measles outbreaks are prevented.’

Dr Richard Vautrey, deputy chair of the GPC, said practices could be expected to immunise large numbers of children in some areas, but that the precise funding that GPs would recieve was yet to be determined.

He told Pulse: ‘The additional service element covers opportunistic immunisations – the key question though is whether the additional workload that practices would have if they were engaged in an active campaign – if they are actively engaged in inviting people in then that’s an additional work that would need to be recognised. That’s what the GPC is talking to the various bodies about.’

Dr John Hughes, honorary secretary of Manchester LMC and a GP in Crumpsall, Manchester, said: ‘If there’s extra work on top of what we normally do, we will need extra resources to be able to do it. It does appear to be a significant and substantial workload, probably higher in the better-off areas.

‘In Wales, they had huge numbers just within that one health authority – they were talking about 30,000 in one relatively small area. There could be similar numbers of 25-30,000 in many areas of England.’

Dr Hughes was sceptical about how many immunisations schools programmes would be able to pick up. He said: ‘GPs will undoubtedly be drafted in to do this – we’ll always step up to the mark and do it because nobody else can. Regardless of what else we’re doing we always manage to create the capacity and get things done.’

Readers' comments (6)

  • JCVI (Joint Committee on Vaccination and Immunization) was fully aware of MMR vaccine dangers as early as 1989, but covered them up!

    Freedom of Information Act has revealed what probably most people do not know and that is the fact that we have been LIED to for a long time and that this lie is being repeated daily through the media to hide the truth and cover up data to encourage vaccine compliance.

    The JCVI made continuous efforts to withhold critical data on severe adverse reactions and contraindications to vaccinations to both parents and health practitioners in order to reach overall vaccination rates which they deemed were necessary for 'herd immunity,' a concept which ... does not rest on solid scientific evidence," explains Dr. Tomljenovic in the introduction to her paper.

    Learn more:
    http://www.naturalnews.com/038598_vaccines_medical_hoax_government_documents.html#ixzz2QorMSgG4


    Dr. Lucija Tomljenovic, Ph.D. has uncovers more than 30 years of hidden government documents exposing these vaccine schedules as a complete hoax, not to mention the fraud of the vaccines themselves to provide any real protection against disease.

    Though her paper focuses primarily on the British health system's elaborate cover-up of the dirty truth about its own national vaccination program, the tenets of the study's findings still apply to vaccination schedules in general, which are typically designed for the purpose of serving corporate interests rather than public health. Government authorities, it turns out, in an ongoing bid to satisfy the private goals of the vaccine industry, have deliberately covered up pertinent information about the dangers and ineffectiveness of vaccines from parents in order to maintain a high rate of vaccination compliance. And in the process, they have put countless millions of children at risk of serious side effects and death.

    You can access Dr. Tomljenovic's full paper here:
    http://www.ecomed.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2011/09/3-tomljenovic.pdf

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Mark Struthers

    "Dr Laurence Buckman, GPC chair, said he was ‘very pleased’ the programme was being launched" ...

    "Men and nations behave wisely once they have exhausted all the other alternatives" ~ Abba Eban.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Mark Struthers

    "Despite the claim of David Salisbury, head of the UK’s Immunization Division, that MMR has, “an exemplary safety record,” two of the three brands introduced in 1988 had to be withdrawn for safety reasons – they caused meningitis."

    http://www.cryshame.co.uk//index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=157&Itemid=135

    Professor David Salisbury CB FRCP FRCPCH FFPH, Director of Immunisation at the Department of Health, claimed that MMR had “an exemplary safety record” in a statement to the GMC in 2007 ... when The Royal Free Three, including Andrew Wakefield were being prosecuted for allegedly being 'dishonest and irresponsible' in their conduct.

    http://youtu.be/uhTYMoBTL6o

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Mark Struthers

    A Liverpool GP on the 'Today' Program this morning (2:01:56) said that parents had lost their trust in GPs, claiming that the doctors were motivated by financial gain .. on the small 'item of service' payment attached to each MMR jab.

    http://www.bbc.co.uk/radio/player/b01s0qmg

    The scouse GP went on - disingenuously - to say that it was perturbing as a GP to hear patients say that your judgement about their child's future was coloured by the paltry amount of money on offer.

    Of course, this GP fails to mention that failure to reach top targets for immunisation resulted in considerable financial losses to a practice - and the fact that the target system of payments was very effective in motivating GPs.

    This campaign is going to fail: honesty is always the best policy when dealing with patients and the public.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Conventional medicine will ultimately be the loser if it continues to make claims about its drugs and vaccines are untrue - people will find out they are not being given full and honest information. Soroush is correct to point out that the JCVI has known about the dangers of vaccines for over 20 years. As far as the MMR vaccine is concerned, it is not safe, and the manufacturers have admitted as much
    (see http://safe-medicine.blogspot.co.uk/2013/04/the-mmr-vaccine-our-gps-nhs-and-big.html)

    The reputation of GPs depends on them having an open and honest relationship with patients. If these dangers are known, patients must be told about them, and the nonsense about these vaccines being 'entirely safe' should be jettisoned.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • While I do not mind one way or the other about GPs being paid to reach vaccine targets (what I actually care about is that children and others are protected against potentially life threatenig diseases) - it is perhaps worth pointing out here that GPs themselves will do none of this work in reailty. It will be undertaken by administrative staff and Practice Nurses who are already wroking at breaking point implementing changed QoF requirements, CVD checks, NHS checks etc. etc. It is only a passing thought..........

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Have your say