Cookie policy notice

By continuing to use this site you agree to our cookies policy below:
Since 26 May 2011, the law now states that cookies on websites can ony be used with your specific consent. Cookies allow us to ensure that you enjoy the best browsing experience.

This site is intended for health professionals only

At the heart of general practice since 1960

GPs' clinical judgement 'excludes most pneumonia'

GPs can be confident in using their clinical judgement to exclude pneumonia, but about two out of three cases of pneumonia will be missed by relying on signs and history alone, a new study shows.

In the first large scale study to assess GPs’ ability to diagnose pneumonia in patients presenting with acute cough, European researchers found that a GP’s diagnosis was correct in 96% of cases where they had judged pneumonia to be absent based on history and a physical examination.

However, of the 140 patients in the study who were found to have pneumonia on chest radiograph, GPs only detected 29% of cases, often because the patient’s signs and symptoms were less severe.

The findings, published this week in the European Respiratory Journal, are based on a Europe-wide study of more than 2,800 primary care patients presenting with acute cough, including 453 assessed by GPs in England and Wales.

In the UK, GPs diagnosed pneumonia in 2% of patients, whereas pneumonia was diagnosed on chest radiograph in almost 7% of patients.

The patients whose pneumonia was only picked up on x-ray tended to have less severe symptoms such as fever, crackles and signs of systemic inflammatory response syndrome.

The Dutch study researchers say the high negative predictive value seen with a GPs’ diagnosis based on signs and history shows there is little justification for using broad spectrum antibiotics on the grounds of not wanting to miss a case of pneumonia.

They concluded: ‘This can support GPs to rely on their ability to exclude pneumonia and withhold antibiotic treatment in a large proportion of their patients.’

They added that it would be difficult to improve on the already high negative predictive rate for pneumonia, and thus there may be no value in using tests such as CRP to exclude the disease.

 And while it might seem ‘worrisome’ that a large number of pneumonia cases detected on x-ray were not diagnosed on clinical grounds, the researchers say many of these patents had less severe disease that usually has a more benign course.

They concluded: ‘Moreover, we assume that the serious negative health effects of a “missed” pneumonia … can be limited by instructing patients to revisit if symptoms persist or worsen.’

Readers' comments (2)

  • Vinci Ho

    Difficult
    Diagnosis based on CXR is not practical all the time.
    Significant proportion of pneumonia is viral
    Certain physical signs are more essential: e.g. respiratory rate , fever, tachycardia and hypotension(relative to patient's usual readings)
    Specificity of GP assessment but sensitivity is poor . This is no news as we are limited with what we can use to definitively diagnose . Remember the common problem with meningitis?You can often tell a child already in meningococcal septicaemia but not in earlier stage of meningitis,.......

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Vinci Ho

    Correction
    Specificity of GP assessment is good but sensitivity is poor.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Have your say