Cookie policy notice

By continuing to use this site you agree to our cookies policy below:
Since 26 May 2011, the law now states that cookies on websites can ony be used with your specific consent. Cookies allow us to ensure that you enjoy the best browsing experience.

This site is intended for health professionals only

At the heart of general practice since 1960

New draft NICE guidance reins in antibiotic prescribing for sinusitis

New draft guidance from NICE suggests antibiotics should not be prescribed for sinusitis lasting less than 10 days.

Acute sinusitis is caused by a virus in 98% of cases and current NICE guidelines suggest antibiotics should only be prescribed for patients who have another illness that puts them at risk of complications or when bacterial sinusitis is suspected – for example if the patient has a fever, severe and unilateral pain or discoloured nasal discharge.

The latest draft guidelines on antimicrobial prescribing for acute sinusitis further clarify when GPs should prescribe antibiotics. The guidelines generally recommend against prescribing antibiotics, stating that they make little difference to symptoms for most people and can cause side-effects including diarrhoea and nausea.

When prescribing an antibiotic, the guidelines recommend penicillin as first choice for both adults and children. They also state that the shortest course likely to be effective should be prescribed, which is a five-day course for both adults and children.

This differs from the existing guidance, which describes amoxicillin as the first-line antibiotic and recommends a seven-day course. The new guidance is also more detailed than the existing, which states only that antibiotics should be prescribed for acute sinusitis in patients ‘who have serious co-morbidities, or other combinations of risk factors’.

Acute sinusitis affects around 15% of people, and UK general practices see around 250 cases of acute sinusitis for every 10,000 person every year.

GPs can send comments on the guidelines to infections@nice.org.uk until 23 June 2017 at 5pm.

Draft guidance in full

For patients with symptoms of 10 days or less:

  • Do not offer an antibiotic.
  • Advise that acute sinusitis usually only lasts 2-3 weeks and an antibiotic is not necessary.
  • Provide guidance on self-care (e.g. use of paracetamol or ibuprofen for pain or fever).

For patients with symptoms of 10 days or more with no improvement:

  • Consider not prescribing an antibiotic or delaying prescription. A prescription can be used if symptoms rapidly deteriorate, significantly worsen or do not improve within a week.
  • Consider offering a high-dose nasal corticosteroid for 2 weeks (for adults and children over 12).

For patients who are very unwell, have symptoms of a more serious illness or are at high-risk of complications:

  • Offer an immediate antibiotic prescription, or further investigation and management based on the NICE guidelines for respiratory tract infections.
  • Refer the patient to hospital if they have symptoms associated with a systemic infection, complications with vision, neurological symptoms such as a severe headache or signs of meningitis.

Source: NICE

Readers' comments (5)

  • Dr De'ath

    We don't need this. How much did producing this trivial guideline cost?

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • I disagree with the comment above.
    Antibiotic prescribing for URTIs remains far too high, and there is a widespread believe that sinusitis = antibiotics, amongst patients and even clinicians. This often results in not only unnecessary consultation but often 2 or 3 for the same episode as patients seek out repeat prescriptions for "stronger antibiotics" in the mistaken belief that somehow this is the answer.
    These waste consultations often at the most pressured time of year.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • well said,John.The "trivial guideline" if universally implemented ,and accompanied by publicity in the Mirror and Mail could save us appointments, forestall resistances, and, to a small extent ,save money which could be better spent elsewhere.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Dr De'ath

    I make the above point not because I disagree with the guidance. I agree with what they are saying complete. I think we all already know there is an issue with the over use of antibiotics. What is the point of NICE exactly...to spend our precious health budget restating the blindingly obvious? Surely there are better ways to be spending our money than churning out endless guidelines on issues that are already well known. Perhaps someone should launch another 'appropriate antibiotic prescribing' campaign instead. Or a patient education campaign to stop folk booking appointments asking for antibiotics for this issue. If the NICE budget is so vast it can produce guidelines such as this you have to ask yourself ..why? My day to day working life has been completely hobbled by lack of funding - and here they are working away producing this kind of clap trap. We don't need another set of mindless 'rules' from this bloated guideline factory. There are more useful things they could be attending to than this. That too I'd suggest, along with this guideline, is fairly obvious.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Dr De'ath

    ..or perhaps the folk posting congratulations to NICE for giving them guidance on issues they obviously are already expert in genuinely believe that they are the only Drs who knew. Might I suggest we would be better educating the public rather than patronising the medical profession.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Have your say