This site is intended for health professionals only

At the heart of general practice since 1960

pulse june2020 80x101px
Read the latest issue online

GPs go forth

BMA asks GPs if they are prepared to close patient lists en masse

GPs in England are being balloted on whether they would be willing to take industrial action by collectively closing their patient lists.

In a letter to GPs, acting GPC chair Dr Richard Vautrey urged GPs to take part in the ballot which will close Thursday 10 August.

But Dr Vautrey's letter did warn that the move would have 'significant implications on GPs as independent contractors'.

The letter said that 'there are two ways in which practices may cease the registration of new patients'. It said these are:

i) Temporarily suspend new patient registrations (strictly speaking, a practice’s list is not considered ‘closed’ in these circumstances); or

ii) Apply to the commissioner for formal list closure.

It added: 'We are therefore balloting practices whether or not they are prepared to undertake either or both of the above courses of action as a form of industrial action.'

The ballot follows the carried LMCs Conference motion which said that 'conference believes that the GP Forward View is failing to deliver the resources necessary to sustain general practice and demands that GPC ballot GPs as to whether they would be prepared to collectively close their lists in response to this crisis'.

Dr Vautrey's letter said: 'As a result, GPC England has been asked to ballot practices as to whether GPs in England are prepared to collectively close their practice lists. Such action would constitute industrial action, and with significant implications on GPs as independent contractors.

'It is therefore important for you and your practice colleagues to read the accompanying explanatory document carefully before responding to our ballot.'

In a FAQ distributed with the letter, the GPC said it was 'important to note that this ballot is about assessing whether or not practices are prepared to undertake this form of action' and that 'the BMA is not at this stage asking practices to undertake any action'.

It also said that GPs should 'note that as self-employed doctors, GP partners do not have the same (limited) immunities from the consequences of taking industrial action as employees do'.

It added: 'If a practice refuses to do something which is a contractual obligation they could be served with a breach notice (the most severe outcome of which is a termination of the contract) – irrespective as to whether it is done as part of a campaign of industrial action... or not.'

The move comes after the GPC announced last August that it had dropped plans to ballot members on potentially submitting undated resignations, or industrial action, after claiming that it had won concessions on workload from NHS England.

It said at the time that NHS England has agreed to take on board a number of suggestions from the GPC’s 'Urgent Prescription for General Practice', including ensuring GPs work within safe limits and longer appointments.

Meanwhile, GP leaders in Northern Ireland are in advanced stages of collecting undated resignations from practices in protest at a the lack of a rescue deal for general practice in the country.

Family Doctor Association chair Dr Peter Swinyard said: 'I don’t think the leadership of GPC were at all pleased with that vote at LMCs conference, it ties their hands quite wickedly and they’re going to have great difficulty with it. I certainly wouldn’t like to be in their shoes at the moment, it really is the devil and the deep blue.

'Even though it stops short of undated resignations, I think this still might be hard to get past as well. We’re a soft-old lot at heart, we all have at-least a bit of cardigan in us.'

Dr Swinyard further said that he will be 'fascinated to see the result', adding: 'It would certainly strengthen GPCs hand in negotiation if there were a strong ballot in favour of doing something along those lines. They’re taking the temperature aren’t they.

'But if everyone says “heavens no old chaps” then they know they haven’t got as strong a negotiating position with NHS England. They can’t say “everyone will quit or close shop if you don’t behave yourself”.'

Readers' comments (24)

  • I await the ballot about whether to have a ballot or not........Not that i am in any way cynical about all this or the BMA and their effectiveness! No unity in the profession and no chance of this even happening i would say

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • How is this supposed to help?

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • I'm not at all impressed at having to choose between voting for a course of action I don't think will help GPs or patients in any way, or voting against it and allowing Mr Hunt to stand up and declare that GPs themselves have said that there is no shortage of GPs and they are not overworked. Sometimes I wonder if our own representatives are even more out of touch than the current government.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • I cannot see how closing patient lists en-masses could possibly be a good idea.

    The action would unfairly discriminate against certain vulnerable individuals, such as the newborn, immigrants and those whose surgeries have closed. It would potentially be illegal under discrimination law and would certainly upset the public of a country that highly prizes fairness and equality.

    It would also have minimal effect on the workload of most surgeries.

    Unless I'm missing something, it is a very dumb idea.

    Resigning the contract en-masse, now there is something different...

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

View results 10 results per page20 results per page50 results per page

Have your say