This site is intended for health professionals only

At the heart of general practice since 1960

pulse june2020 80x101px
Read the latest issue online

GPs go forth

BMA publishes guide on all funding available to GPs

The BMA has published a guide showing what funding and support is available for GP practices and how to apply.

Schemes in the guidance include the General Practice Resilience Programme, which provides support to practices lacking ‘resilience’, the enhanced retained doctor scheme and the general practice development programme, which contains various funding streams such as time for care, practice manager development and online consultation systems.

The guidance also details support for new models of care, the vulnerable practices fund, the clinical pharmacists in general practice pilot, NHS GP health service, the GP Access Fund and the Estates and Transformation Fund.

The guidance also references future schemes that have been announced, but with no concrete details, for example a pharmacy integration fund and practice nurse development.

Dr Krishna Kasaraneni, GPC lead for education, training and workforce, said: ‘We, of course, welcome any funding or support for general practice, but as GPs it can be incredibly difficult to keep track of what is available and how all the different pots of money relate to one another.

’Often the time between the announcement of funds and the closing date for applications is very tight, leaving practices very little time to plan and submit their bid. This guide has been created to help GPs so they know exactly what funding they are entitled to, what criteria has to be met, and where they can find more information.’

Read the full guidance here

Readers' comments (1)

  • Well wor reading the new planning guidance for CCGs and Ben Gowland's latest blog (Ockham Health) to see that hardly any new money is actually coming to general practice and then only significantly to Access pilot sites.

    The monies to CCGs for GP resilience wouldn't buy half a locum day per practice per year let alone anything meaningful.

    The Estates funding set aside to our region might be enough to build one branch of MacDonalds.

    As someone involved in CCGs it's plainly obvious that the rhetoric is not matched at all by actions. Is this extreme incompetence or design?

    So sad that Hunt and Stevens think they're doing a great job but even sadder to witness the demise of general practice. Perhaps they should stop listening to their cronies and start looking at bare facts.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Have your say