This site is intended for health professionals only

At the heart of general practice since 1960

pul jul aug2020 cover 80x101px
Read the latest issue online

Independents' Day

BMA writes to Hunt warning GPs will close lists 'as final recourse'

The BMA has written to health secretary Jeremy Hunt warning that GPs would be willing to close their lists en masse unless the Government tackles the ’urgent challenges which have led us to this position’. 

GP Committee chair Dr Richard Vautrey told the health secretary that the BMA is ‘deeply concerned’ that practices are reaching the point ’where closing their lists seems the only viable way to ensure patient safety’.

He called for a meeting with the health secretary to discuss ‘the urgent challenges which have led us to this position.’

The letter is in response to the survey conducted by the GPC, which found that 54% of practices said they would consider temporarily suspending patient registration to concentrate of delivering safe care to those already on their list. Permanent list closure would be welcomed by 44% of GPs.

Pulse reported that, following the survey, the GPC will consider balloting GPs over closing their lists en masse because of workload pressures.

Dr Vautrey told Mr Hunt: ‘This [survey] clearly demonstrates the huge pressures facing general practice. GPs would only consider such action as a final recourse. We have, unfortunately, seen this borne out with recent announcements of practices having to close their lists.

’We are deeply concerned that this survey demonstrates practices are reaching the point where closing their lists seems the only viable way to ensure patient safety.’

He said the indemnity crisis needed a solution, along with creating ‘a sustainable expansion’ of the GP and community workforce, supporting practice development and sustainability and funding frontline services adequately.

Despite the ambitions set out in the GP Forward View, there are fewer GPs now than in 2015, Dr Vautrey said. ‘It is crucial that the Government tackles the issue of recruitment and retention within general practice as it is fundamental to enabling practices to meet the growing needs of their patients.’

He detailed how ‘prohibitive indemnity costs’ were adding to the ‘severe financial difficulties’ in primary care and exacerbating the workforce crisis.

The rising cost can contribute to GPs cutting their hours, limiting their ability to work in urgent care settings or act as a disincentive to work beyond retirement age.

He called for a new system that is comparable and equitable with secondary care to remove ‘this huge burden’ from GPs.

Dr Vautrey urged Mr Hunt: ’What general practice needs is an immediate, long-term solution for all GPs and their staff working in the NHS.’

He said funding was down to 7.9% from 9.6% in 2005/6.

‘With unprecedented patient demand, a recruitment and retention crisis, huge workforce shortfalls and major practice premises problems, it is no wonder that GPs are having to consider action such as suspending their patients lists, ’ he warned Mr Hunt.

A DH spokesperson said: ’GPs are a vital part of the NHS and we understand the pressures they face - that’s why we’ve committed an extra £2.4bn of funding by 2020/21 and are working closely with the sector to improve patient care and services.

’We would urge the BMA to consider the impact of list closures and the detrimental effect it could have on communities across the country.’

What happens next

The GPC is set to take the results of its survey into negotiations with the Government. It is also expected to update its Urgent Prescription document – its list of demands for general practice – which it will relay to NHS managers.

GPC England will meet in November and decide whether the Government’s response to its demands has been sufficient. GPC chair Dr Richard Vautrey said ‘all options are on the table’.

For any ballot result to be legal, a turnout of at least 50% will be needed, with the majority of those voting in favour of action. Recent changes to trade union law also specify the support of at least 40% of all members entitled to vote (ie, on an 80% turnout, a 51% vote would be acceptable).

There have been indications of how such action would be received, with an unusually measured Daily Mail front page saying GPs were considering taking the ‘drastic’ measures because of the pressure they were under.

But there is the possibility many practices will unilaterally close their lists anyway on the basis of GPC advice they have already received.

The idea of a mass closing of lists was first suggested by Pulse editor Nigel Praities.

Readers' comments (7)

  • Vinci Ho

    I had this dream where 50% or more of all GPs turned up in one of the famous football grounds of the country (you obviously know my preference😜) to cast a vote on this ballot. This will be on front page , garaunteed.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • AlanAlmond

    I’m sure Mr Hunt will read it and smile. He despises GPs.
    “Dear Mr Hunt we are so desperate that a little over half of us might think about possibly...not taking on any more patients...we really are that livid”
    He’ll think..”..ok go on then you bunch of feeble self-imports..make my day”
    Really this is the worse we can threaten? It’s just so depressing. I’m embarrassed to be a GP, I really am.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • I don't support list closure but I support doing a dentist. List closure is a nothing measure.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • its happening already anyway, my neighbours are all closing their lists, putting the pressure onto ever dwindling number of open practices. CCG seems to be supporting them in their actions. Extra money dangled as carrot for all the frail and dying that we are taking on, but usual labyrinthine claim forms and hidden exclusions mean that money only flows to those running CCG boards

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Cobblers

    Anyone remember Folkestone? All seven GP practices put in to close their lists on the grounds of safety.

    Recently read that all seven had been turned down.

    So now what people? Close anyway as safety is paramount? One might get picked off but all seven? Or even five or six out of seven would do.

    It's a domino board. You might be the trigger to start it collapsing and a new GP set-up rises phoenix like from the ashes?

    Or am I dreaming that this sh1t fest will go on and on, ad infinitum ad nauseam?

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • The folks in Folkestone should hand back their contracts......en masse in response to not being allowed to close their lists. This is a one sided fight at present... the gloves need to come off....

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Bit harsh on that poor dentist forgottocheckin 502pm, although the rhetoric is good 💪👍

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Have your say