This site is intended for health professionals only

At the heart of general practice since 1960

DH opens up for doctors' pay review body to apply 'flexibility' on awards

The Department of Health and Social Care has said there could be ‘greater flexibility’ around the 1% pay rise for public sector employees budgeted in the last spending review.

In its evidence to the Review Body on Doctors’ and Dentists’ Remuneration (DDRB), the DHSC said that in parts of the public sector struggling with ‘skills shortage, greater flexibility may be required to deliver world class public services, including in return for improvements to public sector productivity’.

The evidence to the DDRB, for consideration ahead of the 2018/19 pay round, said that while the extra money given to the NHS in the 2017 Budget is a ‘generous settlement’, demands have increased. 

The 2017 budget committed a further £2.8bn to the NHS by 2019/20, and an additional £3.5bn of capital investment by 2022/23 ‘to transform the NHS estate and drive further efficiency savings’.

The document said: ‘Whilst this is a generous settlement, demands on the health and social care system continue to increase and meeting this demand whilst simultaneously improving quality of service in an affordable way is increasingly challenging.’ 

It added: '[T]he last Spending Review budgeted for a 1% average increase in basic pay and progression pay awards and there will still be a need for pay discipline over the coming years; however, there is recognition that in some parts of the public sector, particularly in areas of skills shortage, greater flexibility may be required to deliver world class public services, including in return for improvements to public sector productivity.'

The evidence comes as official statistics show that the average earnings across all types of GPs in England fell by 1.2%, from £91,200 to £90,100.

This comes despite GP practices being awarded a 3.3% funding uplift for 2017/18 that was supposed to translate to a 1% pay increase after taking into account expenses.

GP leaders said at the time that it is ‘unacceptable’ to see GP pay falling, adding it was ‘no wonder’ young GPs were not choosing the profession while older doctors ‘are retiring as soon as they can’.

Meanwhile, a Pulse survey last month of 547 GPs revealed that GP partner pay decreased by 4.3% since April 2017, despite all UK governments awarding GP contractual uplifts for the year that were intended to lead to 1% rises to take-home pay. 

The Scottish Government announced in September that it will scrap the public sector pay cap, opening the way for a real-terms pay rise for GPs.

Readers' comments (6)

  • I am aware that the strong and stable money tree does not exist , but you can’t deny that J Hunt is ideally placed to sort things out , and with extra training he might make the right decisions. Not holding my breath though.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • GP partnerships are being killed off so dont hold out much hope.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • The "extra" £2.8bn is NOT a generous settlement. It is an extra 0.7% per patient when we already are one of the lowest spenders on health care in the developed world!

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • 3.3% uplift with a 7% fall in weighted list size year on year or a 25% weighted list size fall over 4 years - Hunt needs to check NHSE Managers dealings and assets in conjunction with HMR&C. I bet they would be grossly disproportionate even to their 200k incomes at the cost to primary Care in their respective regions.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • It is too late,the DoH has finally admitted they got it wrong but even a 25% uplift wouldn't work now as they have destroyed the infrastructure that made being a partner attractive
    The 2005 contract the pension the primary care estate have been destroyed by Hunt Osborne and PFI leading to a loss of trust,the way Hunt dealt with the juniors was disgraceful as is the way May and Hammond pretend nothing is wrong
    People are dying waiting to be seen in our understaffed hospitals that do not have adequate capacity, it is awful

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • The last thing they intend to do is give partners a rise. They still believe that partners are vastly overpaid and are looking for a much lower average salary

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Have your say