Cookie policy notice

By continuing to use this site you agree to our cookies policy below:
Since 26 May 2011, the law now states that cookies on websites can ony be used with your specific consent. Cookies allow us to ensure that you enjoy the best browsing experience.

This site is intended for health professionals only

At the heart of general practice since 1960

DH rescue package delayed as suggested £110m funding branded 'inadequate'

Exclusive The health secretary’s promised ‘package of measures’ to ease the pressures on general practice has been delayed after wrangling over the size of the promised funding.

Pulse has learnt from insiders that the Department of Health has proposed a £110m rescue package of measures for GPs, including a refreshed retainers scheme and more than 100 ‘golden hellos’ to tempt GP trainees to work in hard-to-recruit areas.

The GPC refused to confirm the amount that has been discussed with DH officials, but told Pulse that they were pushing for a much larger investment to ease the pressures on general practice in England.

The wrangling comes after a disastrous 'new deal' for general practice last year that was widely criticised by GPs as a massive over-sell.

Jeremy Hunt said in January that he would announce the new package of support for general practice in January saying he wanted to do more to ‘support the profession’.

He promised that it would be discussed with the RCGP and the GPC and released in February, but it has been delayed until later this month or April.

Pulse revealed last month that despite Mr Hunt saying the £220m allocated to uplift practice funding by 3.2% next month was 'just the start', there is just £90m left in the pot for the health secretary’s package.

Anonymous sources close to negotiations told Pulse the Government’s offer for the rescue package was currently around £110m. This may also include rebadged money from the next wave of the Prime Minister’s seven-day access pilots.

GPC deputy chair Dr Richard Vautrey refused to comment on the £110m figure, but said that he thinks the sticking point in negotiations is ‘money’. He said: 'The package keeps being delayed and we are not quite sure when it is going to be announced.

'I suspect it is going to be money [holding it up]. Have they got enough money to do what GPs and practices are now expecting of them?’

Asked how much funding is required, he said he ‘did not want to put a figure on it’ but the GPC has been continually pushing for general practice to receive 11% of NHS spend, as it was ten years ago. 

He added: 'A hundred million is not going to go anywhere… We have seen them find billions of pounds for hospital trusts that are in deficit – well, general practice is in deficit effectively to a similar degree, and needs that comparable resource.’

GP executive member Dr Brian Balmer said that anyone hoping the Government was negotiating the rescue deal with the GPC was ‘quite mistaken’.

He said: ’We have spoken to them briefly about what they’re trying to do, and we’re trying to raise another meeting. But we are not negotiating a new package for general practice. Which is a bit sad actually, but we’re not.’

A Department of Health spokesperson said they could not comment on speculation on what the package would contain.

What is happening with GP funding?

 

Money coins 2700x1800px 2

Money coins 2700x1800px 2

The Government is insisting it is pumping more money into primary care, with an announcement of a 4.5% year-on-year funding increase until 2020/21.

But despite this pledge, a Pulse analysis shows the actual proportion of funding to primary care has dropped this year from 7.31% to 7.23%, as the majority of the extra funding (£1.8bn) is being used to bail out hospital trusts in financial difficulty.

But the health secretary’s promise is likely to be fulfilled by 2020/21, as funding increases will lead to the proportion of funding received by general practice increasing to 7.72%, from 7.31% in 2015/16. 

Readers' comments (26)

  • so about £2 per patient

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Mr Hunt your package is distinctly underwhelming and delayed in its function cant say I'm surprised.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Death by a thousand cuts. By providing tiny crumbs to help GPs, Hunt is succeeding in his plan to crack GPs slowly but surely.
    I cannot even think this would keep up with inflation and certainly not with the extortionate rises in fees for indemnity cqc etc.....
    So another pay cut for gps!

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • I will continue to cut back our practice's 'over performance' on access.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Why are beaurocrats and politicians fighing over crumbs...you are all finished, just like the NHS!

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • I have never known morale to be so low.
    I thought they cared about the NHS.
    So many doctors are retiring as they have tried and tried but cannot cope anymore.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Why is anyone expecting there to be any 'rescue package' when JH has already said there is no money! The LMC are idiots!

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Apparently someone peed in the Atlantic in Cornwall and a tsunami is heading towards the Eastern seaboard, New York is doomed.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Medical student07 Mar 2016 10:40am

    Apply to be an observer at the LMC conference. You'll find 600 of us idiots fighting for your future.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • I agree with the medical student @ 10:40 "Why is anyone expecting there to be any 'rescue package' when JH has already said there is no money!"

    There isn't going to be a rescue package anywhere near what is needed. The payback expected by JH from us with regards to the meagre offering will be to open ourselves to even more work for poultry sums.

    I have been watching the LMC conferences on webcasts for years and despite what is desperately needed they have been impotent.

    The nuclear option is all that we have open to us and if this goes ahead the BMA needs to offer alternative suggestions of the future of general practice as JH will not be providing us with the funding that is needed.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

View results 10 results per page20 results per page50 results per page

Have your say

IMPORTANT: On Wednesday 7 December 2016, we implemented a new log in system, and if you have not updated your details you may experience difficulties logging in. Update your details here. Only GMC-registered doctors are able to comment on this site.