Cookie policy notice

By continuing to use this site you agree to our cookies policy below:
Since 26 May 2011, the law now states that cookies on websites can ony be used with your specific consent. Cookies allow us to ensure that you enjoy the best browsing experience.

This site is intended for health professionals only

At the heart of general practice since 1960

First GP practices to ditch national contract will sign local deal next year

Exclusive GPs in Manchester are the first to be offered the chance to ditch the national contract and become part of large organisations that could eventually run services for the whole local population.

A new contract is being developed by local authorities, CCGs, other NHS organisations and LMCs in Greater Manchester, which will see groups of practices beginning to form single legal entities from April, with a view to signing new contracts in the future.

The document announcing the changes said that ’a key part of this will be our aspiration to become an early adopter’ of the new national contract announced by Prime Minister David Cameron in October.

One proposal being discussed in Manchester involves an offer for GP partners to be bought out of their premises.

Under the plans, GPs will eventually jointly run ‘local care organisations’ alongside hospitals, which will cover populations of more than 200,000 people and will see savings made from primary and secondary care shared.

Crucially, the new organisations will not be required to run seven-day routine GP access under the new contract, with a separate contract set to cover this.

Mr Cameron’s announced that the national voluntary contract will begin in April 2017, and will see practices ditching QOF and running seven-day services.

However, the new proposals in Manchester represent the first indications about what the new voluntary contracts could entail.

Proposals currently under discussion include:

  • GPs taking on responsibility for managing a new type of capitated contract for population health and care that encompasses the wider range of services it directly provides for patients;
  • GPs potentially providing services in other care settings, including running sections of district hospitals, care homes and allowing GPs to admit patients directly to hospital;
  • Practices employing or partnering with acute specialists, such as consultant geriatricians, physiatrists, and paediatricians to provide specialist care in the community, and ‘hospital generalists’ to coordinate care for patients with long-term conditions;
  • Redesigned and improving access to community urgent care services;
  • Joined-up electronic health records for their populations.

Practices will look at forming larger legal entities in shadow form from April next year and will begin signing new contracts from November and December next year. 

The new organisations will initially form multispecialty care providers, as envisaged by NHS England chief executive Simon Stevens in the Five Year Forward View.

The plan will be for MCPs to be contracted from ‘local care organisations’ [LCOs], which will cover populations of more than 200,000.

These LCOs could even eventually encompass hospital trusts, and will become responsible for those secondary care services best placed in a community setting.

Dr Tracey Vell, chief executive of Manchester LMC, has been involved in the proposals.

She said: ’The ambition to transform primary care in Greater Manchester has brought some voluntary options for general practice to facilitate this. This has been discussed by GP leaders, federations and CCGs and views from community providers have been sought.

’This is an ambitious programme that will be closely linked to national developments. Practices will be offered help to transform their working lives and the health of their population.’

She told Pulse: ’The chief officer of the devolution system, Ian Williamson, said we are planning an estates buy-out, a central buy out. And that would include buying out GP practices at the going rate.’

Dr Vell added: ’What we want to do is make sure that the LCO is an interface between secondary care and primary care, so that what we save in primary care, from reducing attendance at secondary care, comes in to the same organisation.

’That’s really the problem at the moment - we’re not connecting secondary care with primary care, so savings aren’t reinvested. That vehicle, the joint venture, the LCO will be a way of bringing that saved funding into investments in primary care.’

Readers' comments (44)

  • Collectivization/Americanization continues thanks commissar.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Presumably the extra financing will be thirty pieces of silver .

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • If they partners out, i'm in. And once they buy me out, I'm gone!

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Which rather nicely explains why we will never all stand together - there will always be some of us chasing the money...

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Interesting and exciting.

    Obviously will go down very badly on this bulletin board though. However, I think Manchester Airport has some links to those countries posters will be saying they are emmigrating to

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • They can't buy everyone out - only those selling their souls early . When this precedent is established we'll all be expected to do it for reduced funding (efficiency savings ) . A cunning plan to drop everyone else in the shit . We should negotiate as a profession and not allow this piecemeal erosion of standards .

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • The Government wishes to divide and rule. Sadly, GPs are always too keen to go along with it and don't see the bigger picture.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • The hull of the Titanic was also:
    Innovative, transformative, revolutionary, well joined-up and unsinkable.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • If patients were spending their own money you would see a very different system emerge.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Share the profits with secondary care - what proportion of secondary care trusts are in profit?

    More like share the losses, hide the secondary care deficits in the combined budget and bleed primary care white.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

View results 10 results per page20 results per page50 results per page

Have your say

IMPORTANT: On Wednesday 7 December 2016, we implemented a new log in system, and if you have not updated your details you may experience difficulties logging in. Update your details here. Only GMC-registered doctors are able to comment on this site.