This site is intended for health professionals only

At the heart of general practice since 1960

pul jul aug2020 cover 80x101px
Read the latest issue online

Independents' Day

Minister offers practice 'short-term' emergency payments to keep it afloat

Exclusive A practice facing closure due to the changes to MPIG and QOF says it has been offered the chance to apply for emergency payments to ensure its survival from NHS England during a private meeting with a health minister.

The Jubilee Street Practice told Pulse it had been told there may be additional funding available from NHS England to help their financial situation, but that they had to submit a business case.

According to the practice in Tower Hamlets, east London, health minister Earl Howe suggested at a meeting at their premises on Tuesday that they apply for a ‘short-term, fixed’ payment to supplement the services that they provide above the core contract.

The practice - which has made national headlines after it mounted a campaign to ensure its survival following the loss of hundreds of thousands of pounds from the changes to QOF and MPIG this year- says they have until next Monday to apply for the funding, which will be confirmed in July.

GP leaders have said that ministers and NHS England must extend this offer to all practices at risk of closure as a result of recent changes to the GP contract.

The move marks a significant change of tone, as NHS England head of primary care commissioning Dr David Geddes told Pulse last week that NHS England would not be bringing out ‘the cheque book’ to provide ‘another small MPIG’ to practices destabilised by funding changes.

Dr Geddes also attended the meeting and - according to the practice - said that the first year of additional funding from NHS England would support the additional services they provided above and beyond the core contract, such as caring for a deprived population and translation.

Subsequent year’s funding would have to come from the CCG, Dr Geddes added.

Practice manager Virginia Patania told Pulse that Earl Howe proposed a ‘two-tiered’ approach to keep the practice afloat after it suffered losses of £75,000 last year and expected losses this year of £95,000 this year – a budgetary gap of £7.64 per patient.

She said: ‘There was a very strong commitment to not let good practices that had been severely affected by MPIG-related changes in funding to go under, and Earl Howe was quite clear on this, from a ministerial perspective.

‘He suggested a two-tiered approach, one being a short-term, fixed [payment] to supplement practices that for whatever reason, deprivation or what have you, are not able to cover core services with core funding […] with a longer term commitment to actually review the capitation funding so that practices in more deprived areas, such as Tower Hamlets, wouldn’t be as penalised by the change in the funding formula as they had been in April.’

She added: ‘What they are thinking is for this year the money would need to derive centrally, from budgets that I am not familiar with, but that next year it would likely come from a co-pooling with some of the budget to be derived centrally, but the rest would be a mixture of CCG, public health, council, so the co-commissioning model. So I think they’re basically delaying it to the co-commissioning next year and trying to save our bacon this year.’

‘There is definitely movement, finally we are hearing [there will be] financial support, but who will get it, what you need to do to apply for it, what you need to demonstrate and how much that will be, is all up in the air basically, until the 20 July.’

The Jubilee Street Practice led Tower Hamlets GPs and patients in a protest march against funding cuts yesterday and was featured in national newspaper coverage of the cuts to MPIG.

The GPC said that all MPIG-reliant practices should be allowed to apply for additional funds, as promised by NHS England before the phase-out began this April.

GPC chair Dr Chaand Nagpaul said: ‘This approach should not just be taken with the Jubilee Practice but it should be taken across all the significant losers, so that they are not being penalised because of the vagaries of a formula. NHS England needs to make sure it happens for all of those practices, not just for a few.

‘That is what NHS England committed to doing so I think this is what should have been happening at the outset. There should have been a proactive approach, rather than now, [responding to] a campaign.’

A Department of Health spokesperson said: ‘It was agreed that Dr David Geddes, Head of Primary Care Contracting from NHS England, would meet with the practices individually to discuss a range of possible options to address the  challenges they are facing. We understand that NHS England will look to make decisions on the way forward in the next few weeks in light of these further conversations.’

NHS England was not able to respond in time for publication.

Readers' comments (12)

  • Putting the problem off for a year why would they be doing that!

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Where can we apply?

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • How shameful that practices must take this begging bowl approach. If the government does not want to fund surgeries appropriately they should be allowed to close. Perhaps when the public starts to see the true cost of the government's deliberate attempt to destabilise general practice it will demand an end to the cavalier destruction of general practice as we know it, with no viable alternative in place.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • This is fine for this practice if the money materialises.
    What about dealing with the problem of all the practices whose financial viability is threatened?
    The whole issue needs rethinking and a realistic solution is necessary.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Dr Mustapha Tahir

    NHS England, and the Minister, should consider extending this offer to all practices who could put up a bussiness case that they are in similar circumstances, or likely to be in the very near future. Prevention is always better than cure.
    Mustapha Tahir

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • emergency fund will not last long. what next after emergency fund? but property and rent it to fund practice in ???

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Short-term emergency payments are not the answer. The Government is the cause of the problem as it is not prepared to fund `general Practice adequately.

    Without this changing, there can be no retirement succession and no continuation of existing practices. We are all threatened with destruction. The least the Government can do is pay for our winding up costs as this is basically constructive dismissal.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • There is an inherent problem wherein any GP who is seeing 40+ patients in a 12 hour day is faced with closure because of abstruse and unfair funding. We have become a begging bowl profession thanks to this GPC, which has not the courage to ballot GPs as to their wishes to stay or leave the NHS. These doctors working in Eire, just south of the NI border would be making £2000 a day for the same work.
    It is a shameful indictment of our supine GPC. I have absolutely no idea whom they represent or stand for. They speak weasel words at conferences, but stand blithely by as practices go under because the Govt reneges on its MPIG promise.
    Yet, the GPC wishes to recruit more GPs to put through this nightmare.
    Nobody sane would become a GP when the treatment meted out is begging bowl stuff.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • I think it would be better simply to call the governments bluff and close the affected practices, the patients and GPs will no doubt be welcomed elsewhere and the blame will apportioned at the doorstep of number 10 where it belongs . The proposed solution does nothing to address the sustainability of GP services in these locations or fund patients equitably and the private sector do not have the capacity to take over on mass and no doubt would face greater losses than GPs. Our cries have fallen on deaf ears for too long, it is time to let the voters express their anger.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • whoo hoo, politicians running scared. bet they deny everything.
    Does not matter the colour of the party, they are all yellow to the core. [sorry lib deems, you chose the colour]

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

View results 10 results per page20 results per page

Have your say