This site is intended for health professionals only

At the heart of general practice since 1960

Read the latest issue online

GPs buried under trusts' workload dump

New GP contract to include seven-day access requirement, PM announces

Seven-day access will form part of a new voluntary GP contract to be published by the Government, the Prime Minister has announced.

Speaking on the BBC’s Andrew Marr show today, David Cameron announced that the Government ‘will be publishing a new GP contract to get rid of the box-ticking and the form filling’.

Instead, he said, it will focus on ‘making sure that people in our country can get access to a GP on seven day a week basis, 8am to 8pm’.

The contract will be voluntary and offered to practices or federations covering at least 30,000 patients. 

The BMA has said that this has not been discussed with them, 

NHS England chief executive Simon Stevens also issued a statement saying that they are developing a new voluntary contract for practices to expand and provide primary and secondary care by April 2017.

Mr Cameron told Andrew Marr: ‘I can announce today that we will be publishing a new GP contract to get rid of the box-ticking and the form filling.

‘I don’t think anyone is happy with the GP contract, so this new contract will focus on making sure that people in our country can get access to a GP on seven day a week basis, 8am to 8pm, that’s what we want to see.’

He added: ‘Already because of the steps we have taken, a third of people are accessing the NHS on that basis by next year, but we want it for everybody and that new GP contract will help deliver that.’

A DH press statement said: ’The new contract will be voluntary, with federations or practices that cover populations of at least 30,000 patients.

It added: ’The new contract will be offered to GPs on a phased basis, starting with those groups of GPs that are most ready to work in this new way and building on the success of the pioneering Prime Minister’s Challenge Fund for GP access and the NHS vanguards.’

GPC chair Dr Chaand Nagpaul said that the announcement was ’not discussed with the BMA’, and does ’nothing to address the root causes of the pressures on general practice’. 

He referenced Pulse’s investigation last week showing that due to poor uptake of seven-day services, eight of the original 18 ‘Challenge Fund’ pilots have reducing their opening hours.

He said: ’The Government must learn from its own pilot schemes where there have been a number of examples of weekend appointments having little or no pick up by patients. These proposals could waste precious NHS resources and divert staff and funds from overstretched core GP services.

’While getting rid of the box ticking of QOF is something the BMA has long been calling for, this should apply to all practices. It would be wholly wrong if this is being used as a carrot to only benefit patients for those practices considering the new GP contract.

’Crucially, we do not need the diversion of a new contract, we need proper levels of investment in GP services, and thousands more GPs and staff to keep up with the sheer number of patients coming through the door in order to provide safe, quality care.’

The announcement comes a Pulse investigation last week showing that due to poor uptake of seven-day services, eight of the original 18 ‘Challenge Fund’ pilots have reducing their opening hours.

At the same time, Mr Stevens announced that a new ‘voluntary’ GP contract will be developed to enable practices to work in bigger groupings and follow the lead of some of the ‘vanguard’ projects around the country that are piloting providing a wider range of secondary care and community services.

He said: ‘Many family doctors are now… wanting to pool their sovereignty and work in federations, super practices and our new vanguard care models.

’To support that, they are asking NHS England for a new contract option, which will combine core general practice with wider primary community and health services, serving larger populations.

‘So NHS England will now work with GPs – through the vanguard programme and beyond – to develop a new voluntary contract by April 2017.’

NHS England said in July that GPs would be offered ‘simple and attractive’ conditions to encourage them away from the national contract and join the ‘new models of care’ that are being tested across the country.

 

 

 

Readers' comments (45)

  • I realise you can only have negative comments on Pulse but I think it is worth waiting for the detail. If the 7 day access can be delivered across a large population and if there is new money(which I have heard there will be) it may well be attractive.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • classic.

    wait until practices are up and running with this service, then impose it as a mandatory part of the contract, removing any extra funding that goes to run the things.

    Like we haven;'t seen this before!!

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • I've had a revelation - it's not about the money or the contract.

    This job is a vocation.

    Forget the contract.

    Make sure all patients have your home telephone number and let's all go back on call 24 hours 7 days a week. You could even get the wife to answer the calls.

    Patients will realise our self-sacrifice - thus no inappropriate visit requests would be made.

    Watch episodes of Doc Martin / Doctors for CPD.

    Everyone happy.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Peter Swinyard

    The devil, as ever, is in the detail. Since we are now getting used to Government By Announcement I regret that it sounds as though the GPC has not been consulted yet. It wasn't about the PM Challenge Fund which was also a TOry conference announcement.
    Worse is to hear Jeremy Hunt say that he BELIEVES that 7 day working is good and that we will come to agree with him sometime. Ignoring the evidence of his own pilots. Ignoring the totally demoralised workforce (he has had a 30% pay rise, I have had a 25% pay cut. Gee, thanks).
    I am visiting a friend who was a single handed GP in Southport in 2 weeks. In Brisbane. He is so much happier there and able to practice the expert general practice at which he is so good.
    Tragic.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • I am totally convinced that this government wants to destroy the existing nature of general practice - death by a thousand cuts. But I simply do not believe that the target is to sell off primary care to the private sector, but to rework the system so that it is easier for them to control, without the cost and bother of buying out all practices beforehand.
    The Achilles heel of this plan is that it is likely to be like the OOH debacle of 2004, which must have seemed a very good idea to managers at the time: 'get those inefficient, lazy GPs out of OOH, reorganise it well for them, and we will have a more modern and efficient service'. Then they discovered that it wasn't possible to organise it for the money on offer, the GP on-call was amazingly efficient and cheap, and that the standards often dropped under the new system.
    Exactly the same is likely to happen with the destruction of the current GP system. The government simply has no idea about how efficient most GP practices are. It will only find out when it has destroyed us - but by then, like OOH, it will be far too late and there will be no going back.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • This is what conservative’s want. Sad and unhappy GP practices. They are trying to push the GP’s to such a critical limit. When the hardworking, altruistic GP’s give up private care providers and corporate sharks will take their place. Well done Conservative’s.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • A new contract which is voluntary ... a contradiction in terms.

    A contract is an agreement by which you have to abide.

    Voluntary means you only do it if you want to.

    Any offer from this government means if we say you will do, you will!

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Anonymous | Work for health provider05 Oct 2015 9:40am

    Not sure if you've heard but there are no new money in NHS. The government wishes to save 22 Billion (30-8 billion of so called promised investment) over the next 5 years. Given the proportion of money spent on primary care in NHS has actually decreased in the last (mainly conservative) government, I doubt we will see any "new money". At best it's recycle from efficiency saving but given the cuts required, more likely a cut (rather then saving) which funds this.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • This translates to:
    Voluntary contract = will maintain current (falling) level of income
    Refusing to do above = much worse non viable contract imposed

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Voluntary contract means DES, if practices don't sign up,CCG has to, meaning GPs by default.
    Less paperwork in new contract means UPA DES and some QOF stopped, the monies put into new DES.
    IF you want to earn the money must sign up to the DES, uhm!
    New living wage, less income = redundancies and surgeries close

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

View results 10 results per page20 results per page50 results per page

Have your say