This site is intended for health professionals only

At the heart of general practice since 1960

pul jul aug2020 cover 80x101px
Read the latest issue online

Independents' Day

Practice risks contract breach for refusing to pilot record transfer scheme

Exclusive A GP practice boycotting a new work-intensive pilot to cut costs of patient note transfers could face a breach of contract notice, Pulse has learned.

The pilot scheme requires practices to individually bag hard copies of patient records and match them to a printed barcode when the patient transfers to a new practice, but university practices have said that they are disadvantaged due to their high patient turnover.

The University Health Centre in Huddersfield is refusing to take part in the scheme due to the pressure on workload, but its practice manager said it has now been told it could be in breach of contract as a result.

The pilot, which applies to GP practices across West Yorkshire, aims to test the viability of matching every patient record with a barcode so that they can be tracked electronically.

Janet Hallam, practice manager, said they have continued to pull out notes of patients who have moved practice, but ‘to date have not packed any up in the new envelopes’.

The practice wants assurance from new national supplier Primary Care Support England (PCSE) that it will adjust its processes to take account of the extra burden for practices, in particular those with high volumes of turnover like student practices.

But instead they were warned that they will have to meet the costs of transferring any records they have held back from the pilot, and could be in breach of contract, Ms Hallam said.

She told Pulse: ’Previously we would just have handed the sealed box of records to the courier, but now we are expected to match each set of notes up with the label and put it into a special delivery envelope and then add the label the envelope – sealing the envelope.

‘We now have a pile of notes which we have pulled as deductions from the printouts which come down the link daily but to date have not packed any up in the new envelopes.’

The practice had enquired about how the new system would account for the burden on high volume users but a solution had not been offered.

Ms Hallam said: ’We suggested that we might have to boycott the system until they put such plans into place – the response we received was “it will then be up to you to fund the transmission of those records to their new practice”. We have subsequently heard that NHSE are suggesting that we may be in breach of contract if we boycott the system.

‘Clearly costs are being cut by PCSE and the workload is expected to be carried out by unpaid practice staff. When general practice is already stretched this is totally unreasonable.’

An NHS England spokesperson told Pulse PCSE they had not yet issued any breach notices, but that the contract stated that ’all practices have a contractual obligation to return complete medical records to the commissioner’.  

A spokesperson said: ’NHS England has commissioned Primary Care Support England to deliver primary care support services in England, which includes the safe and secure transfer of patient medical records.

’NHS England is aware, through PCS England, that concerns have been raised by some pilot practices with a high turnover of patients and they continue to work closely with these practices to identify and minimise any impact on workloads’

Elsewhere in the country, practices still have to bag each patient record, but will not need to match them to a barcode. But, as revealed by Pulse in February, practices threatened to boycott plans to send blank records as part of a test run.

New patient record transfer system

NHS England awarded the contract for delivering primary care support to Capita in a bid to cut £40m a year from its £100m annual budget.

The loss of local primary support offices, which have been centralised to Capita’s Preston centre, has seen practices left with piles of uncollected records and frustrated at a lack of information from the overwhelmed helpline.

Pulse reported earlier this month that GP leaders were concerned for patients’ safety after practices waited five weeks for records to be picked up from practices.

Readers' comments (17)

  • If only we'd all got as much gumption. This scheme is an absolute disgrace.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Really raises the question whether we are or not Independent Providers.
    The GMS Contract does not give a carte blanche to NHSE to impose pilots and activities not agreed esp as in this case it is a pilot that would be paid for separately implying a service beyond contract.
    Go for it and breach it.
    Say NO to bullies and rest it on patient safety concerns which you may have getting involved in this due to your Surgery circumstances. I guess that would be the most likely reason why the Practice would be loathe to join the pilot as most do when they have staffing issues or work overload.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • where is the GPC on this?

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Fairly simple.
    Cut down 3 appointments per session.
    no extras.

    Anyone not seen gets given a little note saying that the extra (unfunded) work of the notes trial means that you no longer have capacity to see as many patients and have directed people to A+E.

    I would imagine the trial would finish pretty soon.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Eric Rose question

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Fairly simple 2....

    Agree to do the trial
    Do it terribly - obviously no on purpose but because you do not have the time and prioritise saving lives.

    Wrong barcode with the wrong notes 3 notes together on the same barcode etc.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Anonymous | GP Partner29 Apr 2016 1:35pm

    That will just result in you being hit by the ICO as it will be your fault that it went wrong, and guess what, another contract breach. If its your second breach, you'll also then have the contract removed. We're being shafted.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • This comment has been removed by the moderator.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • In our patch local practice are reporting about 2-3 whole deliveries going to the wrong practice.

    Simply keep reporting to ICO and let them close it down.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • The whole thing is an absolute shambles! We have had 3 drivers turn up in one day none of whom knew what they were doing. We haven't received any notes back for about a month now? Drivers are refusing to collect or deliver to branch surgeries as NHS England have only done the contract to cover the main surgery. The ordering system is awful it's like looking for a needle in a haystack trying to find what you want.....I've worked in general practice for 25 years the old system worked.....the futures bleak!!!!

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

View results 10 results per page20 results per page

Have your say