This site is intended for health professionals only

At the heart of general practice since 1960

pulse june2020 80x101px
Read the latest issue online

The waiting game

Rural and deprived area GPs quit the BMA over new Scottish contract

A group of GPs from rural and deprived practices in Scotland have written an open letter to the BMA saying they plan to resign over its failure to represent their interests in the new contract.

The 10 signatories who include Dr David Hogg, chair of the Rural GP Association, say they have already quit BMA, plan to do so in the near future or are seriously considering it because they feel there has been a ‘serious breach of trust’.

It comes a month after the contract was given the green light after a ballot in which 72% voted in favour of accepting the deal.

But the letter, also signed by GPs working in some Deep End practices points out that with only 28% of practising GPs voting ‘the contract was not endorsed by the majority’.

It also raises concerns that ‘key information about the formula was deliberately withheld from Scottish GPs’, stating that information about the relative impact of the workload allocation formula on rural and deprived practices was not made available.

‘Practices in the greatest need receive no additional resources while those that are already relatively well resourced (including those of the negotiators) will receive all the financial benefits,’ the letter says.

The ambitious contract, which would set Scottish GPs on a different path to the rest of the UK, will see direct reimbursement of practice and staff expenses, a move away from GPs owning premises and a focus on the GP as an expert medical generalist at the head of a multidisciplinary team.

A second round of negotiations, focusing on direct reimbursement and GP pay will begin in 2020 and will be subject to a second poll.

In the strongly worded letter, the group of GPs say the new funding formula does not address unmet need in practices with high levels of deprivation it will also have ‘devastating effects’ on remote rural practices.

It concludes that the BMA has been a ‘weak advocate’ for general practice.

Dr Alan McDevitt, chair of Scotland’s GP Committee said the new GP contract was given ‘clear backing by the profession’.

‘The new contract will reduce the business risks faced by GPs, address spiralling workload demands, and help to encourage more doctors to choose careers in general practice.

‘It addresses the relative underfunding of practice workloads associated with elderly and deprived populations, while ensuring that the finances of every practice are protected.’

He added it was always regrettable when any doctor chooses to end their BMA membership and hoped in time they would reconsider.

Readers' comments (3)

  • The new Scottish GP Contract is not going to address spiralling workload demands because there are no pharmacists, physios,ANP etc etc etc waiting in the wings to help out. Everywhere has rota gaps and this BMA lauded contact isn't worth the paper it is written on. The BMA is self serving and out of touch.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Cobblers

    Dr Alan McDevitt, chair of Scotland’s GP Committee said the new GP contract was given ‘clear backing by the profession’.

    Now there's a politician, not a doctor. Let's remind ourselves that the ballot saw the new Scottish GP contract backed by 71.5% of participating GPs, while 28.5% were opposed.

    However, only 39% of eligible GPs voted.

    Not a mandate then was it?

    Now we will see more and more rural GPs handing their contract back. Enjoy the implosion urban Scottish GPs.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Finally this organization which is a club of mutual adoration and arrogant self centered goons is facing a backlash from people who have had their trust betrayed. BMA is an arm of the government and is a stooge. The sooner members realize and desert, the more comfortable they will be. At the local level there is cheap politics with power hungry and vain activists. At the top level, you have incompetent and rather impotent pseudo Advisers who have no inkling that they often give wrong advice or refuse help to members saying they are not entitled to support. BMA will only prosper in England, this is where the most ass licking goes on and is considered acceptable.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Have your say