Cookie policy notice

By continuing to use this site you agree to our cookies policy below:
Since 26 May 2011, the law now states that cookies on websites can ony be used with your specific consent. Cookies allow us to ensure that you enjoy the best browsing experience.

This site is intended for health professionals only

At the heart of general practice since 1960

Scottish GP leaders vote in favour on key aspects of new contract

The majority of GP representatives attending a special LMCs conference think that the new Scottish GP contract addresses the key issues of sustainable funding, reduced risk, attractiveness of the profession and reduced workload.

Votes on each aspect of the proposed contract – which the profession will be polled on this month - found around 80% agreed or strongly agreed it would have a positive impact.

However strong concerns were raised about the risks of GPs not directly employing new multi-disciplinary teams and fears that GPs were losing their autonomy.

Some said they were ‘hugely skeptical’ that primary care would actually get the money promised in the contract although others said they were excited about the contract and called for more optimism and trust.

BMA GP Committee chair for Scotland Dr Alan McDevitt said the debate had been pretty positive.

‘There is no doubt that general practice must adapt. We have to find new ways of working,’ he said.

Both Dr McDevitt and the health secretary Shona Robison reassured delegates that the first phase of the contract could continue indefinitely if GPs did not agree to phase two which will include further details on funding.

Dr Simon Willetts from Dumfries and Galloway LMC said: ‘This contract offer is very positive.

‘This is the beginning of something really novel,’ he said pointing out that no contract would make everyone happy all the time.

Dr Iain Morrison, from Midlothian LMC wanted more detail on income guarantees but said: ‘There’s a lot to welcome in this contact and I’m very encouraged by lots of the direction of it.’

But Dr Iain Kennedy, medical secretary of Highland LMC told the conference: ‘What we have worked out is this is a salaried contract by stealth.’

He also said there was concern that ‘assets’ of practices most importantly staff employed by practices would be ‘stripped’ by the new contract.

Dr Erik Jespersen, also from Highland LMC, said they had done a poll in Argyll and Bute and 100% of GPs said they had no confidence in the health board to provide the extra staff.

Dr Lynn Duff from Lanarkshire LMC said the contract would stifle innovation and crush new talent by taking away control from GPs.

‘This is a fundamentally flawed model,’ she said, adding that if it went ahead her practice would end up handing back its contract.

The most positive aspects of the contract appeared to be on sustainability and reducing workload, where 84% said they agreed or strongly agreed that the measures outlined in the contract addressed the current problems.

A Pulse poll of over 200 Scottish GPs revealed that the result of the upcoming vote on whether or not to adopt the contract is on a knife edge, with the profession split 50:50.

Also at the conference, the health secretary announced a £100m investment in the new contract, alongside £7.5m for golden hellos to all rural practices.

LMC voting results in full

Does the contract address sustainability of funding

Strongly disagree - 2%

Disagree - 5%

Neither agree or disagree - 10%

Agree - 45%

Strongly Agree - 39%

Does the contract address risk?

Strongly disagree - 2%

Disagree - 9%

Neither agree or disagree - 9%

Agree - 54%

Strongly agree - 25%

Does the contract improve attractiveness of practice?

Strongly disagree - 1%

Disagree - 10%

Neither agree or disagree - 10%

Agree - 56%

Strongly agree - 23%

Does the contract reduce GP workload?

Strongly disagree - 2%

Disagree - 2%

Neither agree or disagree - 10%

Agree - 43%

Strongly agree - 42%

Readers' comments (8)

  • Those voting in favour of this have clearly got Stockholm syndrome from their all their meetings.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • "sustainable funding, reduced risk, attractiveness of the profession and reduced workload"
    Sorry I completely missed the guarentee on maximum workload,how many consults per year,how many problems per consultation??
    Did you publish it on another page?

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Remember this years pay promise is next year pay freeze in the name of sustainability.And a decade later where are we.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Cobblers

    There will be a film released in a year or two called “Bravefart” where a kilted, balding, overweight Scottish GP with wode on his face and swinging a feck off sized stethoscope around his head will be singing “Freedom” at the top of his voice.

    As the forces for NH SS firmly force him into salaried serfdom.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Bizarrely or not, when I came across this, my instant thought was also 'Stockholm Syndrome'.
    Thanks Wee, sleakit, cow'rin, tim'rous beasties etc. Can't see these dudes crying 'Freedom'.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • We might do better under Phase1 which means we've been underpaid for years. But McDevitt promises to start steamrolling Phase2 immediately on that vote's success, which will be a complete disaster for my younger colleagues and my future successor. Regrettably, I see the only way of stopping this hellbound negotiating team is to turn down the extra cash from phase1. The BMA should have the sense to advise the Scottish Government that the only realistic source of significant numbers of GPs is England. It needs a better pay award than down South (England and Australia), meaning more than is lost by Scottish Income Taxation. Droves will, albeit reluctantly, move South under phase2, seems obvious, even if just to transfer their post pension income to the English scheme, in order to avoid lifelong higher Scottish Tax rates.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • ..of course the questions were 'does this contract address..'. Which it does. However, the questions do not ask 'does the contract successfully do anything...'

    The survey does not even ask if these people would support the contract, or if it is on the right lines...

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Before we all vote I would like to see some solidarity within the profession. It is clear from responses so far that this contract has the real potential to wipe out rural General Practice in Scotland. Our negotiators should be representing all of Scotland.
    They should also be representing GPs, and not striking such a good deal for pharmacists, physios etc

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Have your say