Cookie policy notice

By continuing to use this site you agree to our cookies policy below:
Since 26 May 2011, the law now states that cookies on websites can ony be used with your specific consent. Cookies allow us to ensure that you enjoy the best browsing experience.

This site is intended for health professionals only

At the heart of general practice since 1960

Simon Stevens: ‘We need to do what was previously forbidden’

The chief executive of the NHS speaks to Pulse editor Nigel Praities about how he will deliver on his big plan to reform general practice

Simon Stevens - online

It would almost be too easy to make Simon Steven’s headquarters a metaphor for the organisation he heads up – austere, characterless and lacking imagination.

But the man himself is brimming with energy. ‘Welcome to the paperless NHS,’ he jokes as we sit down in his office – a blank glass box containing a table covered with a dozen piles of paperwork.

Mr Stevens has been NHS chief executive for eight months and holds one of the toughest remits in the civil service. He must square the circle of taking forward a health service traumatised by reorganisation, but in need of urgent change to cope with a rising workload and continued budget restraint.

His answer to this problem has been to publish the Five Year Forward View for the NHS, with major changes to the role of GPs at its heart.

‘There are parts of the country where there is a very substantial mismatch between the care needed and the existing funding and model,’ he explains. ‘Places like Staffordshire, parts of Cumbria, and Medway.’

‘If you can’t answer the exam question as posed, then it’s time to change the exam question. We need to put into play a range of options that were previously considered verboten in the NHS.’

‘Next year, I want us to begin to make more progress on premises investment if we can’

Simon Stevens, NHS chief executive

These ‘forbidden’ options include smashing the barriers between GPs and hospitals, with practices employing consultants and hospitals being able to set up GP practices.

He plans for GP practices to become ‘multispecialty community providers’ that will provide much more care outside of hospital, and integrate more closely with pharmacy, mental health and community services.

A brave vision – but how does he plan to implement it? ‘There are places where these new models are more or less in place, but they need extra resourcing and the freedom to help them deliver,’ he says.

‘We will use the next four or five months to kick off a process, so places can say: “Here’s what we want to do, how we’re going to do it, and how it will help care in our area”.’

That sounds great in principle, I say, but most GPs would point out that they need help now. ‘Ah,’ he says, sitting forward in his seat. ‘That is why we have just put out another £300m for CCGs that can be used to support GPs over this winter.

‘I would hope that conversation is happening. If it’s not, then GPs should be on to their CCG governing body about how to do that. Also, co-commissioning kicks in from April, and that gives us a new set of tools.’

Mr Stevens cites the concessions over the withdrawal of MPIG and the slowing of the PMS contract reviews as evidence that he is listening to GPs’ concerns. He also promises to address the chronic lack of investment in practice premises.

‘Next year, I want us to begin to make more progress on premises investment if we can. I’ve talked to the GPC and the RCGP about this and I know that even if GPs were to be funded for more services, there are physical constraints because there is not an extra room in the surgery to do them.

‘Nobody can wave a magic wand, and it will take a number of years to invest in general practice infrastructure to get the kind of modern services that people want. But we’re on to it.

‘I don’t know exactly what the resources will be for next year – it’s dependent on the Government. But we do have some discretion and we’d like to use it in that direction.’

At this point, I feel I can no longer ignore the elephant in the room. Much of Mr Stevens’ plans rely on the goodwill of GPs, but this has largely been burned away by the high-handed treatment of practices by NHS England. Does he think this needs to change?

A sharp intake of breath. ‘If there are particular instances we will look at those, but NHS England has to be the steward of taxpayers’ resources.’

He cites a Pulse investigation into NHS England’s GP list validation scheme from earlier this year as an example of where managers have to make unpopular decisions to safeguard the public purse.

‘Yes, we do need goodwill, but we also have to answer to Parliament and the public for the way payments are made.’ No one can argue with that, I concede, but it is the heavy-handed application of policy that is causing so many problems. He says: ‘If there’s a way of getting a sober-headed sense of what the points of friction are, I would certainly be interested in hearing about them.’

Mr Stevens is not afraid to take on vested interests. One of his first initiatives in post was to call for ideas on how CCGs can share responsibility for commissioning local GP services.

Simon Stevens - online

These plans have progressed and CCG leaders can now opt for one of three levels of co-commissioning responsibility from January, the most extreme being taking on almost all the GP contract and the opportunity to develop local replacements for DESs and the QOF.

This has met vehement opposition from the GPC, which has warned it would be an ‘absolute disaster’ to move away from a national GP contract. But Mr Stevens insists there will still be a role for the national negotiations.

He says: ‘I’ve heard people make various predictions about this. One is that the GMS contract will remain a core option, but other things like enhanced services will increasingly be used. I can see why that makes sense.

‘Can I imagine a time in the near future where there won’t be some kind of core contract? No, I don’t think that’s likely. It’ll continue to be an option.  About 55% of GPs are on GMS contracts. Whether the right answer is to have 55, 65 or 45, that is a choice for GPs.’

Mr Stevens came into the NHS through its graduate training scheme in 1988, but spent 10 years in senior positions at US private healthcare giant UnitedHealth.

He says: ‘I’ve seen the good, the bad and ugly of healthcare systems all round the world and there are things NHS managers could learn about the way care is organised in other places.

‘But on the other hand, the part of the NHS that most people internationally think is really good is general practice: electronic health records, the proactive primary care population orientation, combined with personalisation.

‘There are fewer lessons from abroad that general practice can learn compared with other parts of (NHS) services.’

Read the NHS chief executive Simon Stevens’ CV in full

Quick-fire Q&A

What is the ‘new deal’ for GPs you are calling for?

We’ve got to recognise general practice has lost out in funding to acute care and that the changing needs of outpatients mean we need new style of primary care.

Are CCGs ready for full responsibility for commissioning GP services?

I think every CCG can be involved in dialogue with NHS England locally. I don’t see why most shouldn’t have some sort of formal joint commissioning arrangement. How many want to do full delegation [of GP commissioning] is a matter for them.

Will the dementia identification DES be renewed?

This is just through to March so it’s a one-time catch-up opportunity for practices.

Do you intend to review GPs’ independent contractor status?

There’s a set of choices for GPs and their choices will continue to evolve. For 15 years there has been a range of choice, and people vote with their feet.

Are you shocked by Pulse’s figures on potential practice closures?

The practice unit is an organisational building block; it’s the number of GPs we want to expand. If there are going to be five GPs together rather than two, it means the number of practice units will continue to evolve.

Rate this article  (2.29 average user rating)

Click to rate

  • 1 star out of 5
  • 2 stars out of 5
  • 3 stars out of 5
  • 4 stars out of 5
  • 5 stars out of 5

0 out of 5 stars

Readers' comments (25)

  • If Mr Stevens' plans rely on GP goodwill they are doomed to fail because there is no good will. It's been burned away by 10 yr pay cuts and nobbling of pensions .

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Sell your soul to private companies and then feed gibberish to the Community of which, to be honest, it doesn't seem you are convinced yourself.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Did anyone(including the interviewer) learn anyrthing they didn't know already? He was just going through the motions.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • As a tax payer and a patient who occasionally sits in a doctor's chair (in the role of a F/T NHS GP partner) I would like to ask where my voice and other tax-paying patient's voices and choices have been taken into account in considering what patients need/ want / expect and deserve in drawing up this 5 year plan. Is the photogenic Stevens beguiled by Semiramis' veils? The data expressly stating patients want to see 'their' doctor seems ignored by him and his plan whilst key to the RCGP's approach. Scientia cum Caritas is what caring doctors practice in consultation with human beings. Digital data watching and manipulation by a reductionist science zealots deserve short shrift by one and all.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • unfortunately , unlke simon -from-towers-ivory-stevens, we are not brimming with energy we are at the point of collapse

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Dear Simon
    Stop the government from making hairbrained changes to the NHS for the sake of votes. You have enough money, it just needs to be used to maintain good (not fancy) core practice. No need to spend on additional hours schemes, cash for diagnosis etc... I the words of Sir Bob - give us your ........ money and we'll give you a good service.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • I would consider any option to radically reorganize practice , providing that I can maintain adequate remuneration and it not affect work-life balance too much.
    As if that's ever likely to happen!

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • If we continue on an average list system, the workload will overwhelm us. Already, we are not coping- patients are waiting for weeks for appointments [ which they should not have to] and GPs are leaving as soon as they can.
    GMS Contracts based on list size will become impossible as Diabetes, Dementia and the elderly multi morbid will double in the next 10 years.
    We need a new Contract based on appointment systems payments so patient can get appointments and we can remain sane by providing only a safe number of appointments each.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Like most, very cynical about this but his summary of what's good is excellent ; " the part of the NHS that most people internationally think is really good is general practice: electronic health records, the proactive primary care population orientation, combined with personalisation."

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • The banks were too big to fail and so plenty of tax payer supplied bail-out money was found . Looks like we'll have to bail out the NHS with good will. Did it occur to HMG to ask the financiers for some good will? No because you only have to look at who the politicians went to school with . That means you George.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

View results 10 results per page20 results per page50 results per page

Have your say