This site is intended for health professionals only

At the heart of general practice since 1960

pul jul aug2020 cover 80x101px
Read the latest issue online

Independents' Day

GP contract could be set for 'radical' overhaul as LMCs back payment by activity

The GP contract could be set for a radical overhaul, with payment to be potentially based on activity rather than on capitation basis, after LMC leaders voted in favour of such a move.

Despite GPC setting out its concerns for such a move, LMCs voted 53% in favour of a motion that said the ‘current formula based core contract is unfit for purpose’, and should be ‘replaced by a payment by activity contract which directly links workload to resource’.

This proved a departure from last year, when a similar vote was lost.

Dr Jim Kelly from Kent LMC, who lost the vote last year, said: ‘The Government wants us to do more. They want to move more work our way and the way to incentivise activity is by paying for activity.

‘The problem with the NHS is that we are the most efficient part of it and we’re all on block contracts, effectively. Capitation [payment] is a block contract which means that no matter how hard you work you don’t get any more money.’

He said this was a ‘radical’ motion, adding: ‘It is something that is designed to shake things up. But radical problems need radical solutions.’

Speaking against, Dr Rob Bailey from Cambridgeshire LMC warned that it would lead to increased bureaucracy for GPs who would need to report their activity in order to get paid, similar to reporting QOF.

He said: ‘It would be lovely if we were paid for every item of service we provide, but wouldn’t we risk breaking the link between our patient list and the freedom to do the right thing by introducing target-driven, bean-counting incentives, And who is going to do the counting?’

Speaking ahead of the vote, GPC chair Dr Chaand Nagpaul said: ‘I think there are some real issues here, which conference needs to decide on. I just want say though, that we have seen many problems with payment by result in hospitals.

‘We have seen many perverse effects and NHS England is minded to replace payment by result in hospitals with a capitated approach, simply because they believe that that system is driving activity at the expense of quality.

‘So we have a climate where I don’t believe we are going to see a promotion of payment by activity in hospital. I just want you to consider that.’

Earlier in the same session on funding, LMC representatives also voted for a halt to the demise of seniority payments, which the Government started phasing out last year.

The motion in full:

KENT: That conference believes that the current formula based core contract is unfit for purpose:

(i) in that it fails to recognise the ever increasing demand for access and complex care associated with model 21st century general practice

(ii) in that it fails to incentivise the expansion of primary care needed to cope with the vision set out in the NHS Five Year Forward View

(iii) and should be replaced by a payment by activity contract which directly links workload to resource.

<<< Back to LMCs Conference 2015 coverage

Readers' comments (41)

  • Lot of hot air. Until you are prepared to strike, the Govt will ignore you.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • I understand the GPC's concerns regarding this as once it is based on transaction , it will go the lowest bidder and go the way of OOH. However unless this happens or some kind of co-payment or private consultations are introduced general practice will collapse.
    A good chance it may have already imploded and many who thought they will hold on till after the election will be leaving soon!

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Won't happen!
    If the government were to actually pay GPs for the work they did (ie fee for service model) the NHS wouldn't survive for more than a few weeks. Everyone knows the current model works well for the govt and taxpayer and allows endless work for a fixed cost!! Governments like fixed costs as it allows them to know how much expenditure will be whereas paying the slaves for the work they actually do will lead to higher and higher costs.

    It's nice to see the LMC voting for something positive but as the above points out its nothing more than hot air. Get used to the fact that the system you work under is despotic and whatever is decided by the guys in govt is what will occur. Unless you have the cahoonas to walk away all this above is meaningless

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • GPC and LMC can bang their heads on the wall but it's time they realize that they are impotent and the present state of affairs is due to their incompetency and collusion with the powers to be. Being cosy is fine but you tend to end up on the wrong end of the stick.
    Shout till you are hoarse, nothing will come out of it - as always!

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Blimey, what a feisty lot at this year's conference!

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • About time, 43 year old ready and willing to strike! Anyone else?

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Yep, me too. 48 years old, and would strike in a heartbeat.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • step in right direction - why not go all the way and have private lists with itemized billing ?

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Hazaar!

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Instead of these token green yes vote cards why don't you send a vote paper to all GPs?
    Then do something about it Mr committee/board member/chair/advisor person?

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

View results 10 results per page20 results per page50 results per page

Have your say